Journal of Service Research and Studies (서비스연구)

The Society of service Science (서비스사이언스학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Service Model Research of Bicycle-sharing based on Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS)

MaaS(Mobility-as-a-Service)기반 공유자전거 서비스 모델연구

  • 왕양 ((주)백스테이지) ;
  • 이성필 (동서대학교 디자인대학 서비스디자인과정)
  • Received : 2019.09.15
  • Accepted : 2019.12.16
  • Published : 2019.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Mobility as a Service is a service conception to achieve the intelligent transportation system. Its aims to improve the travel experience. In one platform, it connects various transportation modes to offer service and users only need to pay in one time for the whole travel. But the single MaaS platform easily faces the problems such as low user traffic, low retention rate and the access to markets of the this service is still unfound. From the perspective of bicycle-sharing, this research makes the MaaS concept into bicycle-sharing to build a better service model. The bicycle-sharing combine with the MaaS concept is innovative in business model, travel model and service architecture. In addition, this research also tests users' expectations for service model. The research shows that MaaS-based bicycle-sharing could offer flexible and convenient travel experience in the aspects of combined transportation, travel, transfer and payment, and it also makes it possible to make travel services according to need, and sustainable transport.

Mobility as a Service: MaaS 는 지능형 교통시스템(Intelligent Transportation System)의 일종의 서비스구상으로, 이는 출행 체험을 개선하는 것을 목표로 하며, 하나의 플랫폼에 다양한 교통 출행 방식을 집약하고, 사용자가 한 번의 지불을 통해 도어 투 도어(Door-To-Door)를 사용할 수 있는 전 과정 출행 서비스이다. 그러나, 독립적인 MaaS 플랫폼은 사용자 유동량이 적고 유보율이 낮다는 문제를 직면하기 쉬우며, MaaS의 서비스 모델은 아직 교통시장에 진입할 결정적 논리를 찾지 못하고 있는 실정이다. 본 논문은 공유 자전거(bicycle-sharing)의 각도에서 출발하여, 공유 자전거에 MaaS 이념을 적용하여 새로운 출행 서비스를 구축함으로써, 공유 자전거의 서비스 모델을 최적화하고, MaaS의 부족한 점을 보완하는 것을 연구의 목표로 하였다. 공유 자전거와 MaaS 개념을 결합한 후, 비즈니스 모델, 출행 모델 및 서비스 아키텍처 방면의 혁신에 중점을 두고, 사용자의 MaaS-based bicycle-sharing서비스 모델에 대한 체험의 예상 결과에 대해 시험하였다. 연구 결과에 따르면, MaaS-based bicycle-sharing은 조합 교통 방식, 출행과 환승, 결제 지불 등의 방면에서 사용자에게 보다 융통성 있고 편리한 출행 경험을 제공하고, 수요에 따른 출행 서비스와 지속적인 교통을 가능하게 한다는 것을 알 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Arthur D. Little. (2018). The Future of Mobility 3.0. http://www.adlittle.com/futuremobilitylab/#1
  2. Atkins Mobility. (2015). Journeys of the Future-Introducing Mobility as a Service. https://www.atkinsglobal.com/en-GB/angles/all-angles/journeys-of-the-future
  3. Alvarez-Valdes, R., Belenguer, J. M., Benavent, E., Bermudez, J. D., Munoz, F., & Vercher, E., et al. (2016). Optimizing the level of service quality of a bike-sharing system. Omega, (62), 163-175.
  4. Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15(2), 73-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005
  5. Bartle, C., E. Avineri and K. Chatterjee (2011), Information-sharing and community building: a case-study amongst commuter cyclists. 43rd Universities' Transport Study Group Conference, Milton Keynes, UK, 5-7 January.
  6. Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2010). What's mine is yours. The rise of collaborative consumption.
  7. CAICT & Mobike. (2018). 中国共享单车行业发展报告 (2018). http://www.caict.ac.cn/xwdt/hyxw/201804/t20180426_158046.htm
  8. CIVITAS. (2016). Mobility-as-a-Service: A new transport model. Retrieved from http://civitas.eu/content/civitas-insight-18-mobility-service-new-transport-model
  9. EMBARQ. (2014).Sustainable Mobility Trends around the World. https://wrirosscities.org/media/sustainable-mobility-trends-around-world
  10. Fellander, A., Ingram, C., & Teigland, R. (2015). Sharing economy-embracing change with caution. In Naringspolitiskt Forum rapport (No. 11).
  11. Hensher, D. A. (2017). Future bus transport contracts under a mobility as a service (MaaS) regime in the digital age: are they likely to change?. Transportation Research Part A, 98, 86-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.02.006
  12. Hietanen, S. (2014). "Mobility as a Service"-The new transport model? Eurotransport, 12(2), 2-4.
  13. Holmberg, P. E., Collado, M., Sarasini, S., & Williander, M. (2016). Mobility as a Service-MaaS: Describing the framework. In Tuesday, February 16, 2016.
  14. Hwang, J., & Griffiths, M. A. (2017). Share more, drive less: Millennials value perception and behavioral intent in using collaborative consumption services. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 34(2), 132-146. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-10-2015-1560
  15. Jittrapirom, P., Caiati, V., Feneri, A. M., Ebrahimigharehbaghi, S., Gonzalez, M. J. A., & Narayan, J. (2017). Mobility as a service: a critical review of definitions, assessments of schemes, and key challenges. Urban Planning, 2(2).
  16. Kamargianni, M., & Matyas, M. (2017). The Business Ecosystem of Mobility-as-a-Service. Transportation Research Board.
  17. Klein, N. J., & Smart, M. J. (2017). Millennials and car ownership: Less money, fewer cars. Transport Policy, 53, 20-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.08.010
  18. Konig, D., Eckhardt, J., Aapaoja, A., Sochor, J. & Karlsson, M. (2016). Business and operator models for Mobility as a Service (MaaS) (Deliverable 3 to the MaaSiFiE project). Brussels: Belgium.
  19. Kramer, M. P. (2001). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard business review.
  20. MaaS Alliance. (2017). White Paper-guidelines & recommendations to create the foundations for a thriving MaaS ecosystem.
  21. Mark S., Helen C., Yong T.. (2018). Mobility as a Service: The Next Transport Disruption-A Perspective from China. https://www.lek.com/insights/mobility-service-next-transport-disruption-perspective-china
  22. Michael, D. (2018).Defining generations: Where Millennials end and post-Millennials begin. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/03/01/defining-generations-where-millennials-end-and-post-millennials-begin/
  23. Mont, O., Lehner, M., & Heiskanen, E. (2014). Nudging: A Tool for Sustainable Behaviour?. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency.
  24. Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. John Wiley & Sons.
  25. Piramuthu, O. B., & Zhou, W. (2016). Bicycle Sharing, Social Media, and Environmental Sustainability. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp.2078-2083). IEEE.
  26. Sochor, J., Stromberg, H., & Karlsson, I. M. (2015). Implementing mobility as a service: challenges in integrating user, commercial, and societal perspectives. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (2536), 1-9.
  27. Shaheen, S., Guzman, S., & Zhang, H. (2010). Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia: past, present, and future. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (2143), 159-167.
  28. Venable, J. R., Pries-Heje, J., Bunker, D., & Russo, N. L. (2010). Creation, transfer, and diffusion of innovation in organizations and society: information systems design science research for human benefit., 318(4), 1-10.
  29. Wang, K., Akar, G., & Chen, Y. J. (2018). Bike sharing differences among millennials, Gen Xers, and baby boomers: Lessons learnt from New York City’s bike share. Transportation research part A: policy and practice, 116, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.06.001
  30. Wong, Y. Z., Hensher, D., & Mulley, C. (2018). Emerging transport technologies and the modal efficiency framework: A case for mobility as a service. International Conference Series on Competition and Ownership in Land Passenger Transport, 13-17.
  31. ZHU, D, J. & SHE, Y, S. (2016). From Possession to Use-An Interview with Dajian Zhu on Sharing Economy and Sharing City. Landscape Architecture Frontiers, (3), 32-39.