References
- Joda T, Katsoulis J, Bragger U. Clinical fitting and adjustment time for implant-supported crowns comparing digital and conventional workflows. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2016;18:946-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12377
- Baig MR. Accuracy of impressions of multiple implants in the edentulous arch: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:869-80. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3233
- Mormann WH, Brandestini M, Lutz F, Barbakow F, Gotsch T. CAD-CAM ceramic inlays and onlays: a case report after 3 years in place. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;120:517-20. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1990.0086
- Zarauz C, Valverde A, Martinez-Rus F, Hassan B, Pradies G. Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions. Clin Oral Investig 2016;20:799-806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1590-5
- Rutkunas V, Geciauskaite A, Jegelevicius D, Vaitiekunas M. Accuracy of digital implant impressions with intraoral scanners. A systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol 2017;10:101-120.
- Biagioni A, Ferrari M, Pecciarini M. A systematic review about randomized clinical trials on digital impressions on sound teeth. J Osseointegration 2019;11:2-6.
- Flugge T, van der Meer WJ, Gonzalez BG, Vach K, Wismeijer D, Wang P. The accuracy of different dental impression techniques for implant-supported dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29:374-92.
- Cappare P, Sannino G, Minoli M, Montemezzi P, Ferrini F. Conventional versus digital impressions for full arch screw-retained maxillary rehabilitations: A randomized clinical trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16:829. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16050829
- Alsharbaty MHM, Alikhasi M, Zarrati S, Shamshiri AR. A clinical comparative study of 3-dimensional accuracy between digital and conventional implant impression techniques. J Prosthodont 2019;28:e902-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12764
- Andriessen FS, Rijkens DR, van der Meer WJ, Wismeijer DW. Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2014;111:186-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.010
- Rutkunas V, Ignatovic J. A technique to splint and verify the accuracy of implant impression copings with light-polymerizing acrylic resin. J Prosthet Dent 2014;111:254-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.08.015
- Abduo J, Bennani V, Waddell N, Lyons K, Swain M. Assessing the fit of implant fixed prostheses: a critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:506-15.
- Flugge TV, Att W, Metzger MC, Nelson K. Precision of dental implant digitization using intraoral scanners. Int J Prosthodont 2016;29:277-83. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4417
- Gherlone EF, Ferrini F, Crespi R, Gastaldi G, Cappare P. Digital impressions for fabrication of definitive "all-on-four" restorations. Implant Dent 2015;24:125-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000206
- Venezia P, Torsello F, Cavalcanti R, Casiello E, Chiapasco M. Digital registration of peri-implant transmucosal portion and pontic area in the esthetic zone. J Osseointegration 2017;9:312-6.
- Abduo J. Fit of CAD/CAM implant frameworks: a comprehensive review. J Oral Implantol 2014;40:758-66. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00117
- Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008;204:505-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.350
- Kohorst P, Brinkmann H, Li J, Borchers L, Stiesch M. Marginal accuracy of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated using different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing systems. Eur J Oral Sci 2009;117:319-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00622.x
- Papaspyridakos P, Chen CJ, Gallucci GO, Doukoudakis A, Weber HP, Chronopoulos V. Accuracy of implant impressions for partially and completely edentulous patients: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:836-45. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3625
- Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:399-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(83)80101-2
- Jemt T. Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Branemark implants in edentulous jaws: a study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:270-6.
- Katsoulis J, Takeichi T, Sol Gaviria A, Peter L, Katsoulis K. Misfit of implant prostheses and its impact on clinical outcomes. Definition, assessment and a systematic review of the literature. Eur J Oral Implantol 2017;10:121-38.
- Karl M, Taylor TD. Bone adaptation induced by non-passively fitting implant superstructures: A randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016;31:369-75. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.4331
- Nedelcu R, Olsson P, Nystrom I, Ryden J, Thor A. Accuracy and precision of 3 intraoral scanners and accuracy of conventional impressions: A novel in vivo analysis method. J Dent 2018;69:110-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.12.006
- Semper W, Kraft S, Mehrhof J, Nelson K. Impact of abutment rotation and angulation on marginal fit: theoretical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:752-8.
- Alikhasi M, Monzavi A, Bassir SH, Naini RB, Khosronedjad N, Keshavarz S. A comparison of precision of fit, rotational freedom, and torque loss with copy-milled zirconia and prefabricated titanium abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:996-1002. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2937
- Flugge TV, Att W, Metzger MC, Nelson K. Precision of dental implant digitization using intraoral scanners. Int J Prosthodont 2016;29:277-83. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4417
- Papaspyridakos P, Benic GI, Hogsett VL, White GS, Lal K, Gallucci GO. Accuracy of implant casts generated with splinted and non-splinted impression techniques for edentulous patients: an optical scanning study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:676-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02219.x
- Tan MY, Yee SHX, Wong KM, Tan YH, Tan KBC. Comparison of three-dimensional accuracy of digital and conventional implant impressions: Effect of interimplant distance in an edentulous arch. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2019;34:366-80. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.6855
- Gintaute A. Accuracy of computerized and conventional impression-making procedures of straight and tilted dental implants [Internet]. Freiburg; Albert-Ludwig Universitat; 2015. Available from: https://freidok.uni-freiburg.de/dnb/download/10655
- Gimenez B, Ozcan M, Martinez-Rus F, Pradies G. Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active triangulation technology with blue light for implants: Effect of clinically relevant parameters. Implant Dent 2015;24:498-504. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000283
- Gimenez-Gonzalez B, Hassan B, Ozcan M, Pradies G. An in vitro study of factors influencing the performance of digital intraoral impressions operating on active wavefront sampling technology with multiple implants in the edentulous maxilla. J Prosthodont 2017;26:650-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12457
- Muller P, Ender A, Joda T, Katsoulis J. Impact of digital intraoral scan strategies on the impression accuracy using the TRIOS Pod scanner. Quintessence Int 2016;47:343-9.
- Stimmelmayr M, Guth JF, Erdelt K, Edelhoff D, Beuer F. Digital evaluation of the reproducibility of implant scanbody fit-an in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:851-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0564-5
Cited by
- Accuracy of Five Intraoral Scanners and Two Laboratory Scanners for a Complete Arch: A Comparative In Vitro Study vol.10, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10010074
- Digital Impressions in Implant Dentistry: A Literature Review vol.18, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031020
- A comparative clinical study on the transfer accuracy of conventional and digital implant impressions using a new reference key‐based method vol.32, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13715
- The Influence of Hard- and Software Improvement of Intraoral Scanners on the Implant Transfer Accuracy from 2012 to 2021: An In Vitro Study vol.11, pp.15, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11157166
- Effect of different arch widths on the accuracy of three intraoral scanners vol.13, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2021.13.4.205
- In vitro and in vivo accuracy of full‐arch digital implant impressions vol.32, pp.12, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13844
- Comparison of digital and silicone impressions for single-tooth implants and two- and three-unit implants for a free-end edentulous saddle vol.21, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01836-1