DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of Error Treatment in Multiplication Using Reflective Activities

반성적 활동을 통한 곱셈의 오류 처치 행동 분석

  • Na, Yunji (Graduate School of Seoul National University of Education) ;
  • Park, Mangoo (Seoul National University of Education)
  • Received : 2019.08.16
  • Accepted : 2019.10.25
  • Published : 2019.10.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze errors and treatment behavior during the course of mathematics learning of academic achievement by applying reflective activities in the second semester of the third year of elementary school. The study participants are students from two classes, 21 from the third-grade S elementary school in Seoul and 20 from the comparative class. In the case of the experiment group, the multiplication unit was reconstructed into a mathematics class that applied reflective activities. They were pre-post-test to examine the changes in students' mathematics performance, and mathematical communication was recorded and analyzed for the focus group to analyze the patterns of learners' error handling in the reflective activities. In addition, they recorded and analyzed students' activities and conversations for error type and error handling. As a result of the study, the student's mathematics achievement was increased using reflective activities. When learning double digit multiplication, the error types varied. It was also confirmed that the reflective activities helped learners reflect on the multiplication algorithm and analyze the error-ridden calculations to reflect on and deal with their errors.

본 연구의 목적은 초등학교 3학년 2학기의 곱셈 학습에서 반성적 활동을 적용함으로써 학업성취도의 수학 학습과정 중에 나타나는 오류 및 처치 행동을 분석하는 데 있다. 연구참여하는 학생들에게 곱셈단원에 대하여 반성적 활동을 적용하여 수업을 재구성하여 진행하였다. 이들의 수학 학업성취도의 변화를 알아보기 위하여 사전 사후 검사를 실시하였고, 반성적 활동에서의 학습자의 오류 처치양상을 분석하기 위해 포커스 그룹의 수학적인 의사소통을 녹음하여 분석하였다. 그리고 오류 유형 및 오류 처치를 위하여 학생들의 활동지와 녹음된 대화를 분석하였다. 연구 결과, 반성적 활동을 적용한 경우 학습자의 수학학업성취도가 상승하였다. 두 자리 수의 곱셈을 학습할 때 오류 유형은 다양하게 나타났다. 그리고 반성적 활동은 학습자가 곱셈 알고리즘에 대해 반성하고 오류가 있는 계산을 분석하여 자신의 오류를 반성적으로 되돌아보고 처치하도록 돕게 됨을 확인하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kwon, J. B. (2012). A study on the errors of the multiplication unit for 3rd grade elementary school. Major in Mathematics Education. Graduate School of Chongju National University.
  2. Kim, B. M. (2005). A cognitive psychological study on students' mathematical misconceptions and errors. Department of Mathematics Education. The Graduate School of Ewha Womans University.
  3. Kim, S. M. (2012). The transition of error patterns and error rates in elementary students' arithmetic performance by going up grades and its instructional implication. The Mathematical Education, 16(1), 125-143.
  4. Kim, J. H. (2004). The Effect of reciprocal mathematics writing activities on the critical thinking skills of 4th students. Major in Mathematics Education. Graduate School of Korea National University of Education.
  5. Bae, S., & Park, M. (2008). An influence of exchange writings on the mathematical communication skill and mathematical disposition in the elementary mathematics. The Mathematical Education, 12(2), 156-183.
  6. Ahn, S., & Choi, C. (2016). A study of diagnosis and prescription of errors of fractional multiplication and division. The Mathematical Education, 20(3), 457-477.
  7. Yoon, J. (2005). The effects of reciprocal writing-reflection activities on the learning elementary mathematics: Focused on the 2nd grade students. Major in Mathematics Education. Graduate School of Seoul National University of Education.
  8. Yoon, H. (2002). A study on calculation errors made by elementary students: With the focus on the multiplication and division. Major in Mathematics Education. Graduate School of Incheon National University of Education.
  9. Lee, S., & Choi, C. (2011). Effects of students' collaborative writing activities in elementary mathematics. The Mathematical Education, 15(1), 57-75.
  10. Lee, S. (2017). The effects of collaborative-reflective writing activities on descriptive evaluation achievement and mathematical attitude in the elementary mathematics. Major in Elementary Mathematics Education. Graduate School of Daegu National University of Education.
  11. Lee, Y., & Kim, S. (2004). Analysis of Korean elementary mathematics textbooks, workbooks, and teachers's guide books in respect of using computational error patterns. School Mathematics, 6(4), 345-359.
  12. Choi, J., & Yoo, H. (2006). A study on an analysis of errors of addition and subtraction, and teaching methods: Focusing on elementary school in the third grade. Research Institute of Curriculum & Instruction, 10(2), 303-327.
  13. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation (2017a). In-depth analysis of TIMSS 2015 Korean results. Research Report RRO 2017-5-1. 88-96.
  14. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation (2017b). Mathematical attitudes and influencing factors for Korean students. Issue Paper 2017-66-4. 18-19.
  15. Lannin, J., Townsend, B., & Barker, D. (2006). The reflective cycle of student error analysis. For the Learning of Mathematics, 26(3), 33-38.
  16. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 강윤수 외 8인 역(2005). 정성연구방법론과 사례연구. 서울: 교우사.
  17. Movshovits-Hadar, N., Zaslavsky, O., & Inbar, S. (1987). An empirical classification model for errors in high school mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.2307/749532
  18. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: The Author.
  19. Schon, D. A.(1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. NY: Basic Books.
  20. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). CA: Sage.