의학교육논단 (Korean Medical Education Review)

  • 제21권3호
  • /
  • Pages.155-161
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2092-5603(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-6370(eISSN)
연세대학교 의과대학 (Yonsei university college of medicine)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한국판 전문직 간 학습에 대한 자기 효능감 척도의 타당화

Validity of the Self-efficacy for Interprofessional Experimental Learning Scale in Korea

  • 권오영 (경희대학교 의과대학 의학교육학 및 의인문학교실) ;
  • 박경혜 (연세대학교 원주의과대학 의학교육학과) ;
  • 박귀화 (가천대학교 의과대학 의학교육학교실) ;
  • 강영준 (제주대학교 의학전문대학원 의학교육학교실)
  • Kwon, Oh Young (Department of Medical Education and Medical Humanities, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Kyung Hye (Department of Medical Education, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Kwi Hwa (Department of Medical Education, Gachon University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kang, Youngjoon (Department of Medical Education, Jeju National University School of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2019.08.12
  • 심사 : 2019.10.16
  • 발행 : 2019.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Interprofessional education (IPE) can promote high-quality patient care and good medical outcomes through teamwork among health professionals. However, there are no valid measurements to prove the effectiveness of IPE in Korea. This study aimed to develop and test a Korean version of the Self-efficacy for Interprofessional Experimental Learning Scale (SEIEL). The original SEIEL was translated into Korean by two experienced medical professors, and 368 questionnaires were collected from medical and nursing students (third and fourth year). To analyze the validity of the Korean version of the SEIEL, an exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was conducted. Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ was used to evaluate reliability. Results from the exploratory factor analysis identified two functions: "interprofessional collaboration" and "interprofessional team evaluation." A significant cross-correlation was found between the two functions (r=0.690, p<0.001), with a Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ value of 0.932. The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the SEIEL was identified in this study. This tool can be helpful in measuring the effectiveness of IPE in Korea.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. World Health Organization. Framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
  2. Lee KS, Shin MK. Goals and assignments of healthcare accreditation program in Korea. J Korean Med Assoc. 2012;55(1):7-16. https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2012.55.1.7
  3. Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation. Accreditation standards of KIMEE 2019. Seoul: Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation; 2018.
  4. Ahn D. Korean doctor's role. J Korean Med Assoc. 2014;57(1):3-7. https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2014.57.1.3
  5. Korea Association of Medical Colleges. Learning outcomes of basic medical education: human and society-centered. Seoul: Korea Association of Medical Colleges; 2017.
  6. Barr H. Interprofessional education. In: Dent JA, Harden R, editors. A practical guide for medical teachers. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2005. p. 203-16.
  7. Howkins E. Perspectives of inteprofessional learning and teaching. In: Howkins E, Bray J, editors. Preparing for interprofessional teaching: theory and practice. Oxford: Radcliffe; 2007. p. 1-12.
  8. College of Health Disciplines, University of British Columbia. New collaborations to improve health care in our communities: annual report [Internet]. Vancouver (BC): College of Health Disciplines, University of British Columbia; 2006 [cited 2019 Jun 30]. Available from: http://heatherkent.com/samples/CHD2006AnnualReport.pdf.
  9. Liaskos J, Frigas A, Antypas K, Zikos D, Diomidous M, Mantas J. Promoting interprofessional education in health sector within the European Interprofessional Education Network. Int J Med Inform. 2009;78 Suppl 1:S43-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.08.001
  10. Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel. Core competencies for interprefessional collaborative practice: report of an expert panel [Internet]. Washington (DC): Interprofessional Education Collaborative; 2011 [cited 2019 Jun 30]. Available from: https://ipecollaborative.org/uploads/IPEC-Core-Competencies.pdf.
  11. World Health Organization. Multi-professional patient safety curriculum guide. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012.
  12. Kim YG. Gumi University, 3rd rehabilitation interprofessional education [Internet]. Seoul: Gukjenews; 2016 [cited 2019 Jun 30]. Available from: http://www.gukjenews.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=582298.
  13. Cheon JY. Gwangju Health University, interprofessional education [Internet]. Seoul: Daily UNN; 2017 [cited 2019 Jun 30]. Available from: https://news.unn.net/news/articleView.html?idxno=168117.
  14. Im SJ, Lee SY, Yun Y, Hong JW, Shin SW. Effect of PBL program for cooperative practice between Western and Korean medicine. J Physiol Pathol Korean Med. 2016;30(3):137-41. https://doi.org/10.15188/kjopp.2016.06.30.3.137
  15. Eva KW, Regehr G. Self-assessment in the health professions: a reformulation and research agenda. Acad Med. 2005;80(10 Suppl):S46-54. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200510001-00015
  16. Townsend L, Scanlan JM. Self-efficacy related to student nurses in the clinical setting: a concept analysis. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2011;8(1):1-15. https://doi.org/10.2202/1548-923X.2223.
  17. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  18. Bae JS. A study on the relationships between the self-concept and self-efficacy, and the school achievement [dissertation]. Seoul: Ewha Womans University; 1998.
  19. Mann K, McFetridge-Durdle J, Breau L, Clovis J, Martin-Misener R, Matheson T, et al. Development of a scale to measure health professions students' self-efficacy beliefs in interprofessional learning. J Interprof Care. 2012;26(2):92-9. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2011.640759
  20. DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2012. p.115-8.
  21. Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. Int J Test. 2001;1(1):55-86. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327574IJT0101_4
  22. Kim S. Perceptions and attitudes towards interprofessional education in medical schools. Korean Med Educ Rev. 2017;19(1):10-7. https://doi.org/10.17496/kmer.2017.19.1.10
  23. Hong S. The criteria for selecting appropriate fit indices in structural equation modeling and their rationales. Korean J Clin Psychol. 2000;19(1):161-77.