대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제57권4호
  • /
  • Pages.425-431
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

심미보철 수복을 위한 3차원 안면스캔과 가상 보철물 시각화를 이용한 디지털 치료 증례

Digital approach integrating 3D facial scan and a virtual mockup for esthetic restorative treatment: A case report

  • 마이해엔 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 최용도 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 이두형 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Mai, Hai Yen (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Choi, Yong-Do (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Du-Hyeong (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
  • 투고 : 2019.06.12
  • 심사 : 2019.07.10
  • 발행 : 2019.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 임상증례는 전치부 영역에서 안면영상, 콘빔 컴퓨터 단층촬영 그리고 구내 스캔영상을 이용하여 보철물을 시각화하는 과정을 보여준다. 이러한 접근 방식은 임상과 기공 그리고 환자 측과의 소통을 향상시킨다. 환자가 상악 중절치의 외상 후 보철치료를 위해 내원하였고, 전신 건강 상태는 양호하였다. 안면연상, 콘빔 컴퓨터 단층촬영 그리고 구내 스캔영상을 이용하여 가상 환자 모형을 제작하였다. 최종 보철물의 제작 전 보철물 디자인 영상이 환자에게 제시되었고, 환자의 의견을 반영하여 형태를 수정하였다. 이러한 디지털 작업 과정은 최적의 심미 보철물의 제작을 용이하게 하고, 보철물의 예측성을 향상시킨다.

This clinical case report describes the digital workflow that combines a face scan, cone beam computed tomography and an intraoral scan to visualize the outcome of prosthodontic treatment in the anterior region. This approach improves communication between clinic, laboratory and patients. A patient with healthy general condition came for a restorative treatment to treat post-traumatic central incisors of maxilla. A virtual patient replica was made by incorporating a face scan, cone beam computed tomography and an intraoral scan. Design mockup of definitive restorations was shown to the patient and modified according to the patient's desire. This digital workflow facilitates the fabrication of optimal esthetic restorations, and enhances the predictability of outcome of restorations.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Joda T, Zarone F, Ferrari M. The complete digital workflow in fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health 2017;17:124. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0415-0
  2. Zhou Q, Wang Z, Chen J, Song J, Chen L, Lu Y. Development and evaluation of a digital dental modeling method based on grating projection and reverse engineering software. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:42-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.016
  3. Bhargav A, Sanjairaj V, Rosa V, Feng LW, Fuh Yh J. Applications of additive manufacturing in dentistry: A review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2018;106:2058-64. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33961
  4. Koch GK, Gallucci GO, Lee SJ. Accuracy in the digital workflow: From data acquisition to the digitally milled cast. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:749-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.004
  5. van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 2012;28:3-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.014
  6. Young JM, Altschuler BR. Laser holography in dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1977;38:216-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(77)90289-X
  7. Christensen GJ. Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. J Am Dent Assoc 2009;140:1301-4. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0054
  8. Mangano F, Gandolfi A, Luongo G, Logozzo S. Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature. BMC Oral Health 2017;17:149. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0442-x
  9. Aragon ML, Pontes LF, Bichara LM, Flores-Mir C, Normando D. Validity and reliability of intraoral scanners compared to conventional gypsum models measurements: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod 2016;38:429-34. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjw033
  10. Ender A, Mehl A. In-vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining full-arch dental impressions. Quintessence Int 2015;46:9-17.
  11. Goracci C, Franchi L, Vichi A, Ferrari M. Accuracy, reliability, and efficiency of intraoral scanners for full-arch impressions: a systematic review of the clinical evidence. Eur J Orthod 2016;38:422-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjv077
  12. Budak I, Vukelic D, Bracun D, Hodolic J, Sokovic M. Preprocessing of point-data from contact and optical 3D digitization sensors. Sensors (Basel) 2012;12:1100-26. https://doi.org/10.3390/s120101100
  13. Chochlidakis KM, Papaspyridakos P, Geminiani A, Chen CJ, Feng IJ, Ercoli C. Digital versus conventional impressions for fixed prosthodontics: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:184-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.017
  14. Kattadiyil MT, Jekki R, Goodacre CJ, Baba NZ. Comparison of treatment outcomes in digital and conventional complete removable dental prosthesis fabrications in a predoctoral setting. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:818-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.08.001
  15. Farahani N, Braun A, Jutt D, Huffman T, Reder N, Liu Z, Yagi Y, Pantanowitz L. Three-dimensional Imaging and Scanning: Current and Future Applications for Pathology. J Pathol Inform 2017;8:36. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_32_17
  16. Da Silveira AC, Daw JL Jr, Kusnoto B, Evans C, Cohen M. Craniofacial applications of three-dimensional laser surface scanning. J Craniofac Surg 2003;14:449-56. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200307000-00009
  17. Mankovich NJ, Samson D, Pratt W, Lew D, Beumer J 3rd. Surgical planning using three-dimensional imaging and computer modeling. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1994;27:875-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-6665(20)30614-9
  18. Cattoni F, Mastrangelo F, Gherlone EF, Gastaldi G. A new total digital smile planning technique (3D-DSP) to fabricate CAD-CAM mockups for esthetic crowns and veneers. Int J Dent 2016;2016:6282587.
  19. Sorensen JA. The evolution and revolution in prosthodontics continues. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2016;37:402-4.
  20. Lin WS, Zandinejad A, Metz MJ, Harris BT, Morton D. Predictable restorative work flow for computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacture-fabricated ceramic veneers utilizing a virtual smile design principle. Oper Dent 2015;40:357-63. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-295-S
  21. Liu X, Liu J, Mao H, Tan J. A digital technique for replicating peri-implant soft tissue contours and the emergence profile. J Prosthet Dent 2017;118:264-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.11.006
  22. Abduo J, Bennamoun M, Tennant M, McGeachie J. Impact of digital prosthodontic planning on dental esthetics: Biometric analysis of esthetic parameters. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:57-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.07.005
  23. Im J, Cha JY, Lee KJ, Yu HS, Hwang CJ. Comparison of virtual and manual tooth setups with digital and plaster models in extraction cases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;145:434-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.12.014
  24. Hassan B, Gimenez Gonzalez B, Tahmaseb A, Greven M, Wismeijer D. A digital approach integrating facial scanning in a CAD-CAM workflow for complete-mouth implant-supported rehabilitation of patients with edentulism: A pilot clinical study. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:486-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.033
  25. Pimentel W, Teixeira ML, Costa PP, Jorge MZ, Tiossi R. Predictable outcomes with porcelain laminate veneers: A clinical report. J Prosthodont 2016;25:335-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12413
  26. Edelhoff D, Liebermann A, Beuer F, Stimmelmayr M, Guth JF. Minimally invasive treatment options in fixed prosthodontics. Quintessence Int 2016;47:207-16.
  27. Zimmermann M, Mehl A. Virtual smile design systems: a current review. Int J Comput Dent 2015;18:303-17.