DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Partial replacement of soybean meal with different protein sources in piglet feed during the nursery phase

  • Received : 2017.10.14
  • Accepted : 2018.10.16
  • Published : 2019.11.01

Abstract

Objective: Evaluate the partial replacement of soybean meal with different protein sources in piglet feed during the nursery phase in terms of digestibility of feed, nitrogen balance, growth performance and blood parameters. Methods: Experiment I involved 24 crossbred entire male pigs with an initial body weight (BW) of $18.28{\pm}0.7kg$ and used a randomized complete block design consisting of 3 treatments (fish meal, FM; soybean protein concentrate, SPC; and soybean meal, SBM) and 8 replicates, with 1 pig per experimental unit. Experiment II involved 1,843 crossbred male and female pigs with an initial BW of $6.79{\pm}0.90kg$ and was based on a completely randomized design with a $2{\times}3$ factorial arrangement (2 sexes and 3 protein sources) and 13 replicates. Results: The results of Exp. I indicate effects (p<0.05) of dietary protein sources on digestible protein (FM, 17.84%; SPC, 16.72%, and SBM, 18.13%) and on total nitrogen excretion (TNE, $g/kg\;BW^{0.75}/d$) in which pigs fed with SBM-based feed had TNE values that were 5.36% and 3.72% greater than SPC and FM, respectively. In the Exp. II, there was difference (p<0.01) between sexes in the pre-starter I and starter phases, and total period in average daily feed intake (ADFI), which were greater in females, and between the protein sources, ADFI, final weight and daily weight gain. For urea in the pre-starter II and starter phases and glucose in the pre-starter II phase, there was a difference (p<0.05) between protein sources and between sexes, in starter phase in urea concentrations (females: 57.11 mg/dL and males: 50.60 mg/dL). Conclusion: The use of SBM as only protein source influences larger TNE ($g/kg\;BW^{0.75}/d$), reduces the growth performance of piglets and increases plasma urea concentrations in prestarter II phase.

Keywords

References

  1. Nabuurs MJA, Hoogendoorn A, Van Der Molen EJ, Van Osta ALM. Villus height and crypt depth in weaned and unweaned pigs, reared under various circumstances in the Netherlands. Res Vet Sci 1993;55:78-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-5288(93)90038-H
  2. Lopes EL, Junqueira OM, Araujo LF, Nunes RDC, Duarte KF. Protein sources and levels in the initial diets for piglets weaned at 21 days of age. Rev Bras Zootec 2004;33(supl. 3):2292-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982004000900015
  3. Bertol TM, Mores N, Ludke JV, Franke MR. Soybean proteins processed by different forms in diets for weaned piglets. Rev Bras Zootec 2001;30:150-7. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982001000100022
  4. Oliveira MS, Stein HH. Digestibility of energy, amino acids, and phosphorus in a novel source of soy protein concentrate and in soybean meal fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2016;94:3343-52. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2016-0505
  5. Rojas OJ, Stein HH. Effects of replacing fish, chicken, or poultry by-product meal with fermented soybean meal in diets fed to weanling pigs. Rev Colomb Cienc Pec 2015;28:22-41.
  6. Sulabo RC, Mathai JK, Usry JL, et al. Nutritional value of dried fermentation biomass, hydrolyzed porcine intestinal mucosa products, and fish meal fed to weanling pigs. J Anim Sci 2013;91:2802-11. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5327
  7. Thomaz MC, Hannas MI, Tucci FM, et al. Different protein sources in piglet feeds on trypsin activity and blood parameters. Braz J Vet Res Anim Sci 2009;46:112-21. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2009.26757
  8. Pekas JC. Versatile swine laboratory apparatus for physiologic and metabolic studies. J Anim Sci 1968;27:1303-6. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1968.2751303x
  9. Rostagno HS, Albino LFT, Donzele JL, et al. Brazilian tables for poultry and swine: composition of feedstuffs and nutritional requirements. 3rd ed. Vicosa, MG, Brazil: Universidade Federal de Vicosa; 2011.
  10. Cai Y, Zimmerman DR, Ewan RC. Diurnal variation in concentrations of plasma urea nitrogen and amino acids in pigs given free access to feed or fed twice daily. J Nutr 1994;124:1088-93. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/124.7.1088
  11. Sakomura NK, Rostagno HS. Research methods in monogastric nutrition. Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil: Funep; 2016.
  12. Silva DJ, Queiroz AC. Food analysis (chemical and biological methods). 3rd ed. Vicosa, MG, Brazil: Universidade Federal de Vicosa; 2002.
  13. Matterson LD, Potter LM, Stutz MW, Singsen EP. The metabolizable energy of feed ingredients for chickens. Res Rep Conn Agric Exp Stn 1965;7:3-11.
  14. Adeola O. Digestion and balance techniques in pigs. In: Lewis AJ, Southern LL, editors. Swine nutrition. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC; 2001.
  15. Bertol TM, Ludke JV. Determination of energy values and nitrogen balance of some feeds for the young pigs. Rev Bras Zootec 1999;28:1279-87. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35981999000600015
  16. Friesen KG, Nelssen JL, Goodband RD, Behnke KC, Kats LJ. The effect of moist extrusion of soy products on growth performance and nutrient utilization in the early weaned pig. J Anim Sci 1993;71:2099-109. https://doi.org/10.2527/1993.7182099x
  17. Noblet J, Shi XS. Effect of body weight on digestive utilization of energy and nutrients of ingredients and diets in pigs. Livest Prod Sci 1994;37:323-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(94)90126-0
  18. Swick, RA. US soybean meal: present quality and future trends [Internet]. Bangkok, Thailand: American Soybean Association; 1997 [cited 1998 May 25]. Available from: http://www.pacweb.net.sg/asa
  19. Rojas OJ, Stein HH. Concentration of digestible, metabolizable, and net energy and digestibility of energy and nutrients in fermented soybean meal, conventional soybean meal, and fish meal fed to weanling pigs. J Anim Sci 2013;91:4397-405. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-6409
  20. Dourmad JY, Seve B, Latimier P, et al. Nitrogen consumption, utilization and losses in pig production in France, The Netherlands and Denmark. Livest Prod Sci 1999;58:261-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00015-9
  21. Bertechini AG. Monogastric nutrition. 2nd ed. Lavras, MG, Brazil: Editora UFLA; 2012.
  22. Castilha LD, Pozza PC, Nunes RV, et al. Nitrogen balance of barrows (15-30 kg) fed low protein and different digestible isoleucine levels. Arch Zootec 2013;62:623-6. https://doi.org/10.4321/S0004-05922013000400019
  23. Oliveira V, Fialho ET, Lima JAF, Bertechini AG, De Freitas RTF. Low crude protein diets on the nitrogen and energy metabolism of growing pig. Cienc Agrotec 2005;29:866-74. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542005000400020
  24. Silva CAD, Rocha FL, Machado GS, et al. Sweetener in the drinking water and effects on performance and on the development of intestinal mucosa for piglets subject to segregated early weaned. Rev Bras Zootec 2000;29:1770-6. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982000000600025
  25. Allen PC, Danforth HD, Levander OA. Diets high in n-3 fatty acids reduce cecal lesion scores in chickens infected with Eimeria tenella. Poult Sci 1996;75:179-85. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0750179
  26. Eisemann JH, Nienaber JA. Tissue and whole-body oxygen uptake in fed and fasted steers. Br J Nutr 1990;64:399-411. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19900041

Cited by

  1. Effects of Soybean Meal Fermented by Lactobacillus Species and Clostridium butyricum on Growth Performance, Diarrhea Incidence, and Fecal Bacteria in Weaning Piglets vol.19, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2019-0042
  2. Potential impacts of guava seed meal on piglet feeding as a dietary fibre alternative vol.49, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2021.1961780