Journal of KIBIM (한국BIM학회 논문집)

Korean Institute of Building Information Modeling (한국BIM학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Synergies between Digital Models and Physical Models in Convergence Design - Case Studies using Projects of Architectural Firms and Educational Environments -

건축설계에서 융합설계를 위한 디지털 모델과 물리 모델의 역할과 상호보완성 - 건축설계 회사와 교육환경의 사례를 중심으로 -

  • 김도영 (한국건설기술연구원 미래융합연구본부)
  • Received : 2019.05.21
  • Accepted : 2019.06.28
  • Published : 2019.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper is to explore examples of complementary use of digital and physical models. The reason for this is to suggest a method for commercializing architectural design considering high technology. These cases are the practical and educational environment in which design processes based on digital computation technology are performed. Also, in this environment, analog design media (eg, physical models) still being used in the design process using digital computing. Indeed, in this environment, designers are exploiting digital and physical models to address the types of risks that can be discovered when designs are implemented and these risks. By analyzing these cases, we define the roles of digital and physical models to visualize and resolve risks. This paper focuses on one of method as "prototyping", which is used in the field of machinery and is a difficult method to carry out in the conventional design process. In particular, designers look for benefits that encourage designers in utilizing current digital computation technologies (eg, parametric design, simulation, building information models, and digital fabrication). Among the roles of the physical model, roles that can not be replaced by the digital model are explored. It is clear that this case-based study has difficulty in generalizing the design method. However, it helps the designers of today's practical and educational environment to verify and design the actual details of construction and operation when applying and developing unfamiliar materials and methods in the field of architecture.

Keywords

References

  1. Aish, R. Woodbury, R. (2005), Multi-level interaction in parametric design, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3638, 151-162.
  2. Brooke, L. (2008), Ford Model T: The car that put the world on wheels, 1st edition, Motorbooks.
  3. Bryan, F. R. (1997). Beyond the model T: the other ventures of Henry Ford, Wayne state university press.
  4. Carpo, M. (2011). The alphabet and the algorithm, 1st edition, MIT Press.
  5. Cowey, J., Danis, B., Guichard, D., Raynaud, J., Aubry, S., Boniface, V., Chinzi, G. (2013-a), Glass sails above a sea of forest, World of Glass, pp. 64-87.
  6. Cowey, J., Danis, B., Guichard, D., Raynaud, J., Aubry, S., Boniface, V., Chinzi, G. (2013-b). Glass sails above a sea of forest: Louis Vuitton HQ, Intelligent Glass Solutions, pp. 73-91.
  7. Dam, R., Siang T. (2019). 5 Stages in the Design Thinking Process, https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/5-stages-in-the-design-thinking-process (Jan. 28. 2019)
  8. Defense Acquisition University. (1997). Acquisition Logistics Guide, Defense System Management College, Fort Belvoir, Virginia.
  9. de Wilde, P., Coley, D. (2012). The implications of a changing climate for buildings. Building and Environment, 55, pp. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.03.014
  10. Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., Liston, K. (2011), BIM handbook: a guide to Building Information Modeling for owners, mangers, designers, engineers, and contractors, John Wiley & Sons, Canada.
  11. Eekhout, M., van Swieten, P. (2004), Full-scale material prototyping, International Engingeering and Product Design Education Conference, Delft, Netherlands.
  12. Eekhout, M. (2008), Methodology for product development in architecture, IOS Press.
  13. Eekhout, M., van Swieten, P. (2015), The Delft Prototype Laboratory, Research in Design Series, Vol. 8, IOS Press.
  14. Ford, H. (1992), My life and work, Garden city.
  15. Hargrave, J., Mistry, R., Wilson, R. (2013), It's alive: Can you imagine the urban building of the future?, Arup report, https://www.arup.com/perspectives/publications, (Jun. 6. 2019)
  16. Kirkegaard, P. H., Foged, I. W. (2011), Development and evaluation of a responsive building envelope, Presented at the International Adaptive Architecture Conference: The Building Centre, London.
  17. Kim, S. A. (1997-a). On the Role of Modeling in the Education of Computer-Aided Architectural Design. Journal of architectural institute of Korea, 13, pp. 37-44.
  18. Kim, S. A. (1997-b). Version Management in Computer Aided Architectural Design, Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.
  19. Kolarevic, B. (2008). The (risky) craft of digital making, Manufacturing material effects: Rethinking design and making in architecture, pp.119-128.
  20. Lee, E., Segerstrom, M. L. (2016), The Bartlett School of Architecture UCL.
  21. Lueth, P. L. O. (2008), The achitectural design studio as a learning environment: a qualitative exploration of architecture design student learning experiences in design studios from first-through fourth-year, Ph. D.(Dissertation), Iowa State University.
  22. Meagher M. (2014), Responsive architecture and the problem of obsolescence. International journal of architectural research - ArchNet-IJAR, 8(3), pp. 95-104. https://doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v8i3.498
  23. Migayrou, F., Porter, A. (2015), The Bartlett School of Architecture UCL, https://issuu.com/bartlettarchucl/docs/thebartlettbook2016-preview/86, (Oct. 6, 2019).
  24. Prager, F. D., Scaglia, G. (2004), Brunelleschi: studies of his technology and inventions, Dover Publications.
  25. Ron, R. (2012), Exploration of eco-kinetic systems in architecture: development of dynamic interactive building elements, Proceedings of the 30th eCAADe Conference, Vol. 2, pp.381-389.
  26. Sjarifudin, F. J. (2013), Kinetic decorative ornaments using parametric camshaft mechanism for adaptive building skin. 1st eCAADe Regional International Workshop, pp. 183-191.
  27. Smith, A. (2004), Architectural model as machine-a new view of models from antiquity to the present day, 1st edition, Architectural press.
  28. Wang, J., Li, J. (2010), Bio-inspired kinetic envelopes for building energy efficiency based on parametric design of building information modeling. Power and energy engineering conference (APPEEC), pp. 1-4.
  29. Weng, Y.S, Chen, Y. P., Ma, y. P., Pan, C. A., Jeng, T. S. (2013), Eco-machine: a green robotic ecosystem for sustainable environments. International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia, pp. 925-934.
  30. Ulrich, K. T., Eppinger, S. D. (2012), Product and Design Development, Fifth Edition. McGraw Hill Companies.
  31. Autodesk (2015), https://academy.autodesk.com/inspiration/jeremy-ficca-digital-fabrication-and-computationdesign-studio, (Nov. 2. 2018)
  32. dFAB, http://cmu-dfab.org/, https://soa.cmu.edu/dfab/, (Nov. 10. 2018)
  33. Kim, S. J. (2015), Digital Fabrication in Architectural Design and Construction Engineering for a Complex Geometry, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Planning & Design, 59(7), pp. 46-52.
  34. Kim, S. J. (2012), Digital Optimization Method for Constructability of Freeform Building. Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Building Construction Conference, 12(2), pp. 225-226.
  35. Han, K. H., Yun, I. G., Lee, K. T., Kim, T. Y. (2014), Various Perspectives on the Concept of Failure and its Implication in Engineering Education. Journal of engineering education research, 17(6), pp. 12-19. https://doi.org/10.18108/JEER.2014.17.6.12