생태와환경 (Korean Journal of Ecology and Environment)

  • 제52권3호
  • /
  • Pages.231-244
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2288-1115(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-1123(eISSN)
한국수생태학회 (The Korean Society of Limnology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

담수생태계 특성을 고려한 동물플랑크톤 정량 조사법의 비교와 활용

Quantitative Zooplankton Collection Methods for Various Freshwater Ecosystems and Their Applications

  • Oh, Hye-Ji (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Chang, Kwang-Hyeon (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Jeong, Hyun-Gi (Nakdong River Environment Research Center, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Go, Soon-Mi (Gyeonggi-do Institute of Health & Environment) ;
  • La, Geung-Hwan (Eco-lab Gongsaeng) ;
  • Kim, Hyun-Woo (Department of Environmental Education, Sunchon National University)
  • 투고 : 2019.07.08
  • 심사 : 2019.09.02
  • 발행 : 2019.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

동물플랑크톤은 식물플랑크톤 및 기타 소형 미생물을 섭식하고, 고차 생물군집에 포식되어 일차생산과 상위 영양단계를 연결하는 중추적인 연결고리 역할자로 수생태계내 물질 및 에너지 순환 구조와 기능을 이해하는데 필수적인 요소로 여겨지고 있다. 하지만, 동물플랑크톤은 분류군에 따라 상이한 크기와 유영능력, 그에 따른 다양한 서식 특성을 가지고 있어, 식물플랑크톤에 비해 다소 복잡한 채집 및 분석방법이 요구된다. 정확한 동물플랑크톤 정량화를 위해서는 종특이적인 분포를 고려하여 장소를 선정하고 적합한 도구(채수기, 플랑크톤 네트 등)를 이용하여 시료를 채집해야 할 필요가 있으며, 동정 및 계수 중에 발생할 수 있는 오차를 최소화하기 위해서는 고정법과 부차시료에 대한 고려도 중요하다. 본 논문에서는 현재 사용되고 있는 대표적인 동물플랑크톤 정량채집방법 및 시료처리방법의 장 단점을 소개하여 연구 목적에 부합하는 방법을 선택, 적용할 수 있도록 가이드라인을 제시하고자 하였다.

Zooplankton is essential biological assemblage in understanding the structure and function of aquatic ecosystems, since it plays as a linkage between primary producers and higher trophic level organisms such as fish. Although zooplankton has planktonic characteristics, the sampling and treatment methods for its community analyses are more complicated and variable compared with phytoplankton due to its high diversity in body size and species-specific depth selection behaviors. In the present paper, we reviewed representative classical methods for field sampling and treatments of freshwater zooplankton in relation with quantification of its community structure, and suggested appropriate methods depending on various research objectives.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Akinbuwa, O. and I.F. Adeniyi. 1996. Seasonal variation, distribution and interrelationships of rotifers in Opa Resevoir, Nigeria. African journal of Ecology 34(4): 351-363. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2028.1996.tb00631.x
  2. Broughton, E.A. and R.G. Lough. 2006. A direct comparison of MOCNESS and Video Plankton Recorder zooplankton abundance estimates: possible applications for augmenting net sampling with video systems. Deep-Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography 53(23-24): 2789-2807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2006.08.013
  3. Bucklin, A., P.K. Lindequ, N. Rodriguez-Ezpeleta, A. Albaina and M. Lehtiniemi. 2016. Metabarcoding of marine zooplankton: prospects, progress and pitfalls. Journal of Plankton Research 38: 393-400. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbw023
  4. Chetelat, J., F.R. Pick and P.B. Hamilton. 2006. Potamoplankton size structure and taxonomic composition: influence of river size and nutrient concentrations. Limnology and Oceanography 51(1, part 2): 681-689. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2006.51.1_part_2.0681
  5. Chang, K.H., S.J. Hwang, M.H. Jang, H.W. Kim, K.S. Jeong and G.J. Joo. 2001. Effect of juvenile fish predation on the zooplankton community in the large regulated Nakdong River, South Korea. Korean Journal of Limnology 34: 310-318.
  6. Chang, K.H. and T. Hanazato. 2003. Seasonal and spatial distribution of two Bosmina species (B. longirostris and B. fatalis) in Lake Suwa, Japan: its relation to the predator Leptodora. Limnology 4: 47-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10201-002-0085-7
  7. Chang, K.H. and T. Hanazato. 2004. Diel vertical migrations of invertebrate predators (Leptodora kindtii, Thermocyclops taihokuensis, and Mesocyclops sp.) in a shallow, eutrophic lake. Hydrobiologia 528: 249-259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-004-3952-x
  8. Chang, K.H. and T. Hanazato. 2007. Ecological role of predacious cladoceran Leptodora kindtii in a lake food web: a review. Bulletin of the Plankton Society of Japan 54: 99-110.
  9. Diovisalvi, N., G.E.S. Echeverry, L. Lagomarsino and H.E. Zagarese. 2015. Seasonal patterns and responses to an extreme climate event of rotifers community in a shallow eutrophic Pampean lake. Hydrobiologia 752(1): 125-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-014-1909-2
  10. Dodson, S.L., C.E. Cáceres and D.C. Rogers. 2010. Cladocera and other Branchiopoda. In Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates. Academic Press, Cambridge: 773-827.
  11. Frost, B.W. and S.M. Bollens. 1992. Variability of diel vertical migration in the marine planktonic copepod Pseudocalanus newmani in relation to its predators. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49(6): 1137-1141. https://doi.org/10.1139/f92-126
  12. Garcia, P.R., S. Nandini, S.S.S. Sarma, E.R. Valderrama, I. Cuesta and M.D. Hurtado. 2002. Seasonal variations of zooplankton abundance in the freshwater reservoir Valle de Bravo (Mexico). Hydrobiologia 467(1-3): 99-108. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014953119507
  13. Grosbois, G., P.A. del Glorgio and M. Rautio. 2017. Zooplankton allochthony is spatially heterogeneous in a boreal lake. Freshwater Biology 62(3): 474-490. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12879
  14. Haney, J.F. and D.J. Hall. 1973. Sugarcoated Daphnia: A preservation technique for Cladocera 1. Limnology and Oceanography 18(2): 331-333. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1973.18.2.0331
  15. Harper, L.R., A.S. Buxton, H.C. Rees, K. Bruce, R. Brys, D. Halfmaerten, D.S. Read, H.V. Watson, C.D. Sayer, E.P. Jones, V. Priestley, E. Mächler, C. Múrria, S. Garces-Pastor, C. Medupin, K. Burgess, G. Benson, N. Boonham, R.A. Griffiths, L.L. Handley and B. Hanfling. 2019. Prospects and challenges of environmental DNA (eDNA) monitoring in freshwater ponds. Hydrobiologia 826(1): 25-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-018-3750-5
  16. Hochberg, R., R.L. Wallace and E.J. Walsh. 2015. Soft bodies, hard jaws: an introduction to the symposium, with rotifers as models of jaw diversity. Integrative and Comparative Biology 55(2): 179-192. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icv002
  17. Jacobs, F. and G. Grant. 1978. Guidelines for zooplankton sampling in quantitative baseline and monitoring programs. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., EPA/600/3-78/026.
  18. Joo, G.J., K.S. Jeong, H.W. Kim and K.H. Chang. 2002. Vertical distribution of zooplankton in the regulated river (Nakdong River). Korean Journal of Limnology 35(4): 320-325.
  19. Joseph, L.N., S.A. Field, C. Wilcox and H.P. Possingham. 2006. Presence-absence versus abundance data for monitoring threatened species. Conservation Biology 20(6): 679-1687. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00433.x
  20. Kim, H.W., S.J. Hwang and G.J. Joo. 2000a. Zooplankton grazing on bacteria and phytoplankton in the regulated Nakdong River (Korea). Journal of Plankton Research 22(8): 1557-1577.
  21. Kim, H.W., G.J. Joo and N. Walz. 2000b. Differences of zooplankton development along a lake and a river stretch of the River Spree (Germany). Korean Journal of Limnology 33(3): 197-205.
  22. Kim, H.W., S.J. Hwang, K.H. Chang, M.H. Jang, G.J. Joo and N. Walz. 2002. Longitudinal difference in zooplankton grazing on phyto- and bacterioplankton in the Nakdong River (Korea). International Review of Hydrobiology 87: 281- 293. https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2632(200205)87:2/3<281::AID-IROH281>3.0.CO;2-V
  23. Kim, H.W., K.H. Chang, K.-S. Jeong and G.J. Joo. 2003. The spring metazooplankton dynamics in the river-reservoir hybrid system (Nakdong River, Korea): its role in controlling the phytoplankton biomass. Korean Journal of Limnology 36(4): 420-426.
  24. Kim, H.W., K.H. Chang, W.K. Shin, G.H. La, K.S. Jeong and G.J. Joo 2004. Population dynamics of predator (Asplanchna spp.) and its impact on herbivorous rotifers community in three tributaries of the Nakdong River (S. Korea). Korean Journal of Limnology 37: 385-393.
  25. Kim, H.W., G.H. La, J.H. Park, H.J. Song, K.S. Hwang, B.J. Lim and H.U. Lee. 2012. Community size structure of zooplankton assemblages in 29 lentic ecosystems on the Youngsan-Seomjin River basin (2010-2011). Korean Journal of Environmental Biology 30(1): 64-70.
  26. Kim, H.W., H.G. Jeong, J.Y. Choi, S.K. Kim, K.S. Jeong, G.H. La, H.J. Oh and K.H. Chang. 2018. Past history of freshwater zooplankton research in South Korea and Korean Society of Limnology and future directions. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 51: 40-59. https://doi.org/10.11614/KSL.2018.51.1.040
  27. Lee, P.G. and C. Park. 2004. Impact of mesh size difference on zooplankton distribution data and community interpretation. The Sea, Journal of the Korean Society of Oceanography 9: 12-19.
  28. Lee, S.W., S.J. Hwang, J.K. Lee, S.I. Jung, Y.J. Park and J.T. Kim. 2011. Overview and application of the National Aquatic Ecological Monitoring Program (NAEMP) in Korea. Journal of International Limnology 47(S1): S3- S14. https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2011016
  29. Lucas, M.C. and E. Baras. 2000. Methods for studying spatial behaviour of freshwater fishes in the natural environment. Fish and Fisheries 1(4): 283-316. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-2979.2000.00028.x
  30. Makino, W., N. Maruoka, M. Nakagawa and N. Takamura. 2017. DNA barcoding of freshwater zooplankton in Lake Kasumigaura, Japan. Ecological Research 32: 481-493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-017-1458-z
  31. May, L. 1986. Rotifer sampling-a complete species list from on visit? Hydrobiologia 134: 117-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00006735
  32. Ministry of Environment. 2017a. Biomonitoring survey and assessment manual.
  33. Ministry of Environment. 2017b. Guideline for environmental assessment in lakes and reservoirs.
  34. Ministry of the Environment Government of Japan. 2014. Monitoring sites 1000 land water survey (lakes and marshes): 2009-2013 summary report. Environmental Specialized data for Government offices 49(6): 47-126. (in Japanese)
  35. Mostajir, B., S. Demers, S. de Mora, C. Belzile, J. Chanut, M. Gosselin, S. Roy, P. Z. Villegas, J. Fauchot, J. Bouchard, D. Bird, P. Monfort and M. Levasseur. 1999. Experimental test of the effect of ultraviolet-B radiation in a planktonic community. Limnology and Oceanography 44(3): 586-596. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1999.44.3.0586
  36. Oh, H.J., H.G. Jeong, G.S. Nam, Y. Oda, W. Dai, E.H. Lee, D. Kong, S.J. Hwang and K.H. Chang. 2017. Comparison of taxon-based and trophi-based response patterns of rotifer community to water quality: applicability of the rotifer functional group as an indicator of water quality. Animal Cells and Systems 21(2): 133-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/19768354.2017.1292952
  37. Osugi, O., T. Shigeru and A. Kunihiko. 2014. Revision of the manual for national census on river environments in dams: improvement of plankton survey methods. Report of Water Resources Environment Research Institute: 40-46. (in Japanese)
  38. Paloheimo, J.E. 1974. Calculation of instantaneous birth rate1. Limnology and Oceanography 19(4): 692-694. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1974.19.4.0692
  39. Parmar, T.K., D. Rawtani and Y.K. Agrawal. 2016. Bioindicators: the natural indicator of environmental pollution. Frontiers in Life Science 9(2): 110-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/21553769.2016.1162753
  40. Pitois, S.G., P. Bouch, V. Creach and J. Van der Kooij. 2016. Comparison of zooplankton data collected by a continuous semi-automatic sampler (CALPS) and a traditional vertical ring net. Journal of Plankton Research 38: 931- 943. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbw044
  41. Reid, J.W. and C.E. Williamson. 2010. Copepoda. In Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates. Academic Press, Cambridge: 829-899.
  42. Riccardi, N. 2010. Selectivity of plankton nets over mesozooplankton taxa: implications for abundance, biomass and diversity estimation. Journal of Limnology 69(2): 287- 296. https://doi.org/10.4081/jlimnol.2010.287
  43. Sakamoto, M., T. Nagata, T. Hanazato, Y. Miyabara, J.Y. Ha, H.D. Park, H. Toda, H.J. Oh, Y. Oda and K.H. Chang. 2018. Long-term zooplankton community records (1996- 2017) for Lake Suwa (Japan). Ecological Research 33(1): 1-1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-017-1528-2
  44. Sakuma, M., T. Hanazato, R. Nakazato and H. Haga. 2002. Methods for quantitative sampling of epiphytic microinvertebrates in lake vegetation. Limnology 3: 115-119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s102010200013
  45. Seo, D.I., G.S. Nam, S.H. Lee, E.H. Lee, M. Kim, J.Y. Choi, J.H. Kim and K.H. Chang. 2013. Plankton community in weir section of the Nakdong River and its relation with selected environmental factors. Korean Journal of Environmental Biology 31(4): 362-369. https://doi.org/10.11626/KJEB.2013.31.4.362
  46. Smith, P.E., R.C. Counts and R.I. Clutter. 1968. Changes in filtering efficiency of plankton nets due to clogging under tow. ICES Journal of Marine Science 32(2): 232-248. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/32.2.232
  47. Speirs, D.C. and W.S. Gurney. 2001. Population persistence in rivers and estuaries. Ecology 82(5): 1219-1237. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[1219:PPIRAE]2.0.CO;2
  48. Suthers, I.M. and D. Rissik. 2009. Plankton: a guide to their ecology and monitoring for water quality. CSIRO publishing, Clayton.
  49. Taniguchi, H., S. Takano and M. Tokeshi. 2003. Influences of habitat complexity on the diversity and abundance of epiphytic invertebrates on plants. Freshwater Biology 48: 718-728. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01047.x
  50. Thomas, S.M., J.H. Chick and S.J. Czesny. 2016. Underestimation of microzooplankton is a macro problem: one size fits all zooplankton sampling needs alterations. Journal of Great Lakes Research 43(1): 91-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2016.11.002
  51. Tseng, L.C., H.U. Dahms, J.J. Hung, Q.C. Chen and J.S. Hwang. 2011. Can different mesh sizes affect the results of copepod community studies? Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 398(1-2): 47-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2010.12.007
  52. USEPA. 2012. 2012 National lakes assessment: field operations manual.
  53. USEPA. 2013. Standard operating procedure for zooplankton sample collection and preservation and secchi depth measurement field procedures.
  54. W. Effler, S., M.E. Spada, R.K. Gelda, F. Peng, D.A. Matthews, C.M. Kearns and N.G. Hairston Jr. 2015. Daphnia grazing, the clear water phase, and implications of minerogenic particles in Onondaga Lake. Inland Waters 5(4): 317-330. https://doi.org/10.5268/IW-5.4.765
  55. Wallace, R.L., T.W. Snell, C. Ricci and T. Nogrady. 2006. Rotifera part 1: biology, ecology and systematics. Guides to the identification of the microinvertebrates of the continental waters of the world. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden.
  56. Wallace, R.L. and T.W. Snell. 2010. Rotifera. p. 173-235 In: Ecology and classification of north American freshwater invertebrates (Thorp J.H. and A.P Covich, eds.). Academic Press, New York.
  57. Wetzel, R.G. and G.E. Likens. 1979. Limnological analyses. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia.
  58. Yoccoz, N.G., J.D. Nichols and T. Boulinier. 2001. Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16(8): 446-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02205-4
  59. Zinabu, G.M. and T.L. Bott. 2000. The effects of formalin and Lugol’s iodine solution on protozoal cell volume. Limnologica-Ecology and Management of Inland Waters 30(1): 59-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0075-9511(00)80044-4