References
- Chung KJ. The peer review system of Archives of Plastic Surgery: current status and plans for improvement. Arch Plast Surg 2019;46:187-8. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2019.00528
- Song SY. A note on the current review process of Archives of Plastic Surgery. Arch Plast Surg 2019;46:289-90. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2019.00843
- SCImago Journal Rank. SCImago Journal & Country Rank [Internet]. Amsterdam: Elsevier [cited 2019 Sep 12]. Available from: https://www.scimagojr.com.
- Choi JW. PRS Korea 2017 & 2018: how to organize an International Plastic Surgery Congress and how to make it more attractive. Arch Plast Surg 2018;45:295-7. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2018.00661
- Kim KS. Into a global future with our members to serve the people. Arch Plast Surg 2019;46:99-101. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2019.00262
- Huh S. How to deal with ethical issues involving animal experiments and identifiable photographs in articles published in Archives of Plastic Surgery. Arch Plast Surg 2017;44:475-6. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2017.01578
- Han K, Jung I. Trends in statistical methods in articles published in Archives of Plastic Surgery between 2012 and 2017. Arch Plast Surg 2018;45:207-13. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2018.00010
Cited by
- Innovation in plastic surgery-why and how? vol.48, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2021.01669