Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

  • 제44권4호
  • /
  • Pages.45.1-45.10
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2234-7658(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-7666(eISSN)
대한치과보존학회 (The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of 10-MDP concentration on the adhesion and physical properties of self-adhesive resin cements

  • Shibuya, Kazuhiko (Department of Operative Dentistry, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences) ;
  • Ohara, Naoko (Department of Operative Dentistry, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences) ;
  • Ono, Serina (Department of Operative Dentistry, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences) ;
  • Matsuzaki, Kumiko (Department of Operative Dentistry, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences) ;
  • Yoshiyama, Masahiro (Department of Operative Dentistry, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences)
  • 투고 : 2019.07.05
  • 심사 : 2019.10.12
  • 발행 : 2019.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objectives: Self-adhesive resin cements contain functional monomers that enable them to adhere to the tooth structure without a separate adhesive or etchant. One of the most stable functional monomers used for chemical bonding to calcium in hydroxyapatite is 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP). The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the10-MDP concentration on the bond strength and physical properties of self-adhesive resin cements. Materials and Methods: We used experimental resin cements containing 3 different concentrations of 10-MDP: 3.3 wt% (RC1), 6.6 wt% (RC2), or 9.9 wt% (RC3). The micro-tensile bond strength of each resin cement to dentin and a hybrid resin block (Estenia C&B, Kuraray Noritake Dental) was measured, and the fractured surface morphology was analyzed. Further, the flexural strength of the resin cements was measured using the three-point bending test. The water sorption and solubility of the cements following 30 days of immersion in water were measured. Results: The bond strength of RC2 was significantly higher than that of RC1. There was no significant difference between the bond strength of RC2 and that of RC3. The water sorption of RC3 was higher than that of any other cement. There were no significant differences in the three-point bending strength or water solubility among all three types of cements. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, it is suggested that 6.6 wt% 10-MDP showed superior properties than 3.3 wt% or 9.9 wt% 10-MDP in self-adhesive resin cement.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Snauwaert J, Hellemans L, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Wakasa K, Pashley DH. Hybridization effectiveness of a two-step versus a three-step smear layer removing adhesive system examined correlatively by TEM and AFM. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:7-23.
  2. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Short- and long-term bonding efficacy of a self-etching, one-step adhesive. J Adhes Dent 2003;5:41-45.
  3. Beier US, Kapferer I, Dumfahrt H. Clinical long-term evaluation and failure characteristics of 1,335 all-ceramic restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2012;25:70-78.
  4. van Dijken JW, Hasselrot L. A prospective 15-year evaluation of extensive dentin-enamel-bonded pressed ceramic coverages. Dent Mater 2010;26:929-939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.05.008
  5. Spencer P, Swafford JR. Unprotected protein at the dentin-adhesive interface. Quintessence Int 1999;30:501-507.
  6. Walshaw PR, McComb D. Clinical considerations for optimal dentinal bonding. Quintessence Int 1996;27:619-625.
  7. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Technique sensitivity of dentin bonding: effect of application mistakes on bond strength and marginal adaptation. Oper Dent 2000;25:324-330.
  8. De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, Hikita K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2004;20:963-971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.03.002
  9. Ibarra G, Johnson GH, Geurtsen W, Vargas MA. Microleakage of porcelain veneer restorations bonded to enamel and dentin with a new self-adhesive resin-based dental cement. Dent Mater 2007;23:218-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.013
  10. Hosaka K, Tagami J, Nishitani Y, Yoshiyama M, Carrilho M, Tay FR, Agee KA, Pashley DH. Effect of wet vs. dry testing on the mechanical properties of hydrophilic self-etching primer polymers. Eur J Oral Sci 2007;115:239-245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2007.00452.x
  11. Ikemura K, Tay FR, Nishiyama N, Pashley DH, Endo T. Design of new phosphonic acid monomers for dental adhesives--synthesis of (meth)acryloxyalkyl 3-phosphonopropionates and evaluation of their adhesion-promoting functions. Dent Mater J 2006;25:566-575. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.25.566
  12. Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 2004;83:454-458. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408300604
  13. Braem M, Finger W, Van Doren VE, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Mechanical properties and filler fraction of dental composites. Dent Mater 1989;5:346-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(89)90128-0
  14. Soderholm KJ. Influence of silane treatment and filler fraction on thermal expansion of composite resins. J Dent Res 1984;63:1321-1326. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345840630111401
  15. Asmussen E. Factors affecting the color stability of restorative resins. Acta Odontol Scand 1983;41:11-18. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016358309162298
  16. Asmussen E. Softening of BISGMA-based polymers by ethanol and by organic acids of plaque. Scand J Dent Res 1984;92:257-261.
  17. Ito S, Hashimoto M, Wadgaonkar B, Svizero N, Carvalho RM, Yiu C, Rueggeberg FA, Foulger S, Saito T, Nishitani Y, Yoshiyama M, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Effects of resin hydrophilicity on water sorption and changes in modulus of elasticity. Biomaterials 2005;26:6449-6459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.04.052
  18. Vanlandingham MR, Eduljee RF, Gillespie JW Jr. Moisture diffusion in epoxy systems. J Appl Polym Sci 1999;71:787-798. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990131)71:5<787::AID-APP12>3.0.CO;2-A
  19. Ping ZH, Nguyen QT, Chen SM, Zhou JQ, Ding YD. States of water in different hydrophilic polymers-DSC and FTIR studies. Polymer (Guildf) 2001;42:8461-8467. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(01)00358-5
  20. Liu M, Wu P, Dinga Y, Li S. Study on diffusion behavior of water in epoxy resins cured by active ester. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2003;5:1848-1852. https://doi.org/10.1039/b208782k
  21. Azevedo CG, De Goes MF, Ambrosano GM, Chan DC. 1-Year clinical study of indirect resin composite restorations luted with a self-adhesive resin cement: effect of enamel etching. Braz Dent J 2012;23:97-103. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402012000200002
  22. Aschenbrenner CM, Lang R, Handel G, Behr M. Analysis of marginal adaptation and sealing to enamel and dentin of four self-adhesive resin cements. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:191-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-010-0501-z
  23. Pan Y, Xu X, Sun F, Meng X. Surface morphology and mechanical properties of conventional and self-adhesive resin cements after aqueous aging. J Appl Oral Sci 2018;27:e20170449. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0449
  24. Sokolowski G, Szczesio A, Bociong K, Kaluzinska K, Lapinska B, Sokolowski J, Domarecka M, Lukomska-Szymanska M. Dental resin cements-the influence of water sorption on contraction stress changes and hydroscopic expansion. Materials (Basel) 2018;11:E973.
  25. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater 2001;17:296-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00087-7
  26. Hiraishi N, Nishiyama N, Ikemura K, Yau JY, King NM, Tagami J, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Water concentration in self-etching primers affects their aggressiveness and bonding efficacy to dentin. J Dent Res 2005;84:653-658. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400714
  27. Bowen RL, Bennett PS, Groh RJ, Farahani M, Eichmiller FC. New surface-active comonomer for adhesive bonding. J Dent Res 1996;75:606-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345960750011501
  28. Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Bonding to ground dentin by a phenyl-P self-etching primer. J Dent Res 1994;73:1212-1220. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345940730061301
  29. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Hiraishi N, Yiu CK. Water treeing in simplified dentin adhesives--deja vu? Oper Dent 2005;30:561-579.
  30. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Have dentin adhesives become too hydrophilic? J Can Dent Assoc 2003;69:726-731.
  31. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Itthagarun A. Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent 2002;30:371-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00064-7
  32. Lin J, Shinya A, Gomi H, Shinya A. Bonding of self-adhesive resin cements to enamel using different surface treatments: bond strength and etching pattern evaluations. Dent Mater J 2010;29:425-432. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2009-140
  33. Wu J, Zhang Q, Weir MD, Oates TW, Zhou C, Chang X, Xu HH. Novel self-healing dental luting cements with microcapsules for indirect restorations. J Dent 2017;66:76-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.08.006

피인용 문헌

  1. Investigating a Commercial Functional Adhesive with 12-MDPB and Reactive Filler to Strengthen the Adhesive Interface in Eroded Dentin vol.13, pp.20, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13203562