DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison between Heart Rates and Borg's Scale as a Tool to Evaluate Physical Workload

작업 현장에서 육체적 작업 강도를 평가하는 도구로서 Borg's Scale과 심박 수의 비교

  • 김병훈 (EHS 이음 과학기술인 협동조합) ;
  • 박지영 (EHS 이음 과학기술인 협동조합) ;
  • 탁상우 (EHS 이음 과학기술인 협동조합)
  • Received : 2019.06.10
  • Accepted : 2019.08.20
  • Published : 2019.09.30

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the associations of borg's scale with actual heart rates of workers and energy consumption during their physical work. Methods: A total of 72 workers performing physical activities in postal service, ceramic manufacturing, and metal manufacturing participated in heart rate measurement for 1 work shift using the activity meter(A360) and responded to a borg's scale questionnaire. Results: In consistent with previous findings, we presented high correlation between borg's scale and energy consumption measures among workers performing physical activities(r=0.89) while post-work average heart rate showed nearly no correlation with post-work borg's scale (r=0.09). We proposed a set of adjustments when using borg's scale to estimate physical workload for those workers engaged in physical activities during the majority of their work shift. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that a caution should be paid to when using Borg's scale to estimate heart rates during physical activities as well as energy consumption as the product of heart rate measurements.

Keywords

References

  1. Andris Freivalds, Benjamin W. Niebel. Niebel's Methods, Standards, and Work Design(13th edition), 2014; p 149-152 (ISBN-13 9791156159575)
  2. Bar-Or, 0. Age-related changes in exercise perception. In: Physical Work and Effort, G. Borg (Ed.). Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1977, pp. 255-266.
  3. Borg G. Physical performance and perceived exertion. Lund: Gleerup 1962
  4. Borg G, Linderholm H. Perceived exertion and pulse rate during graded exercise in various age groups. Journal of Internal Medicine, 1967.181(S472):194-206 (http://doi.org 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1967.tb12626.x)
  5. Chen YL, Chen CC, et al. Relationships of Borg's RPE 6--20 Scale and heart Rate in Dynamic and Static Exercises among A Sample of Young Taiwanese Men. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 2013, 117, 3, 971-982 (http://doi.org 10.2466/03.08.PMS.117x32z6)
  6. Jung BY, Lee DG. Modern Ergonomics. 2009; p 269-273 (ISBN-13 9791186378083)
  7. Lee O, Jung JW, Validity of Borg's Category Ratio 10 Scale during Maximal-graded Exercise Testing. Exerc Sci 2016; 25(2): 92-99 (https://doi.org/10.15857/ksep.2016.25.2.92)
  8. Mizoue T, Fujino Y, Yamato H, Tokunaga S, Kubo T, Reijula K. Overtime work, cigarette consumption, and addiction to cigarette among workers subject to mild smoking restrictions. Ind Health, 2006, 44(2):244-9 (http://doi.org 10.2486/indhealth.44.244)
  9. Mary C. Gillach, James F. Sallis. et al. The Relationship between Perceived Exertion and Heart Rate in Children and Adults. Pediatric Exercise Science, 1989, 1 (4):360-368 (https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.1.4.360)
  10. Park JH. GI DH, LEE GT, CHOE GL. Ergonomics for Occupational Safety and Health Managers. 2011; p. 286-287 (ISBN-13 9788993292275)
  11. Spiridon G Karavatas, Kamran Tavakol. Concurrent validity of rating of perceived exertion in african-american young adults, employing heart rate as the standard. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practices. 2005, 3(1)
  12. Thomas f. birk, Mraianne Mossing. Relationship of Perceived Exertion to Heart Rate and Ventilation in Active Teenagers With Cerebral Palsy. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 1988, 5: 154-164 (https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.5.2.154)
  13. Virtanen M, Jokela M, Nyberg ST, et al. Long working hours and alcohol use: systematic review and metaanalysis of published studies and unpublished individual participant data. BMJ 2015;350:g7772 (http://doi.org 10.1136/bmj.g7772)
  14. Woo JH, Kang DM, Shin YC, Kim MO, Son MJ et al, Energy Expenditure of Male Blue Collar Workers. Korean Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 2006, 16(2):183-192
  15. Wu HC1, Wang MJ. Relationship between maximum acceptable work time and physical workload. Ergonomics, 2002;45(4):280-9 (http://doi.org 10.1080/00140130210123499)