DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Standardization of work environment measurement information for constructing exposure surveillance system

노출감시체계 구축을 위한 작업환경측정 정보 표준화

  • Choi, Sangjun (Department of Occupational Health, Daegu Catholic University) ;
  • Jeong, Jee Yoen (Department of Occupational and Environment Health, Yong In University) ;
  • Im, Sungguk (Occupational and Environmental Hygiene Division, Korean Industrial Health Association) ;
  • Lim, Daesung (Hansung Health and Safety Technology Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Koh, Dong-Hee (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, International St.Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University) ;
  • Park, Donguk (Department of Environmental Health Systems, Graduated School of Korea National Open University) ;
  • Park, YunKyung (Department of Occupational Health, Daegu Catholic University) ;
  • Kim, Soyeon (Department of Environmental Health Systems, Graduated School of Korea National Open University) ;
  • Chung, Eunkyo (Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute)
  • 최상준 (대구가톨릭대학교 산업보건학과) ;
  • 정지연 (용인대학교 산업환경보건학과) ;
  • 임성국 (대한산업보건협회 본부 환경위생팀) ;
  • 임대성 (한성보건안전기술원(주)) ;
  • 고동희 (가톨릭관동대학교 성모병원) ;
  • 박동욱 (한국방송통신대학교) ;
  • 박윤경 (대구가톨릭대학교 산업보건학과) ;
  • 김소연 (한국방송통신대학교) ;
  • 정은교 (한국산업안전보건공단)
  • Received : 2019.07.09
  • Accepted : 2019.08.30
  • Published : 2019.09.30

Abstract

Objectives: The goal of this study is to standardize industry, process, and job within work environment measurement information. Methods: We selected 180 work environment measurement reports on 30 industries from a database monitored from 2014 to 2016 by the Korea Industrial Health Association. Ten industrial hygienists, each with over five years of experience in measurement, conducted a primary standardization of 180 reports. Two professional industrial hygienists with more than 20 years of experience each reviewed and revised the results of the primary standardization. We also examined the validity on the usefulness of the standardized database by the two industrial hygienists. Results: The final standardization results were classified into eight major categories, 23 sub-major categories, 39 minor categories, 53 unit categories and 70 sub-unit categories in the Korean Standard Industrial Classification (KSIC) 10th revision. A total of 161 processes were standardized, and there were 148 processes with K2B codes. Standard job was coded into 13 job groups including operator, automobile maintenance, nurse, maintenance, manager, excavating machine operator, forklift driver, radiologist, clinical pathologist, signer, researcher, kitchen assistant, and concrete reinforcement ironworker. Conclusions: Although the standardized information in this study may be only a part of the total information, it can be useful for improvement of the K2B system. Additional research is needed for an ongoing clean-up of data in the K2B and re-calibration and reclassification of standard processes until the future national exposure monitoring system is fully established.

Keywords

References

  1. BGIA(Institute for occupational safety and health). BGMG, measurement system for exposure assessment of the German social accident insurance institutions. DGUV.; 2009. p. 23-26
  2. Choi S. Assessment on work environment monitoring program in Korea. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg 2008;18(4):282-292
  3. Feldman D. English public law. Oxford University Press; 2004. p. 1241-1252
  4. Gabriel S. The BG measurement system for hazardous substances(BGMG) and exposure database of hazardous substances(MEGA). Int J Occup Safety and Ergonomics 2006;12(1):1014-104 https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2006.11076673
  5. Jeong JY, Kang TS, Lee SG, Park HD, Kim KY. An improvement plan for a workplace monitoring system through random selection of workplaces and unnoticed measurement inspection. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg 2017:27(2):105-114 https://doi.org/10.15269/JKSOEH.2017.27.2.105
  6. Kauppinen T, Uuksulainen S, Saalo A, Makinen I, Pukkala E. Use of the Finnish information system on occupational exposure (FINJEM) in epidemiologic, surveillance, and other applications, Ann Occup Hyg 2014;58(3):380-396 https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/met074
  7. Park DU, Goh DH, Ahn JS, Lee KH, Jeong JY et al. Standardization study on work environment measurement information. The Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute.; 2017. p. 126-132
  8. Park DY, Shin CS, Kim BY, Yoon JG, Kim SG et al. Study on Institutional and Operational Status of the Unified and Integrated OSH System and Coverage of the OHS legislation in Some Developed Countries - USA, UK, Germany, Japan -. The Ministry of Labor.; 2003. p. 179-185
  9. Rantanen J, Kauppinen T, Toikkanen J, Kurppa K, Lehtinen S, et al. Work and health country profiles: country profiles and national surveillance indicators in occupational health and safety. People and Work-Research reports 44. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health.; 2001. p. 8-19
  10. Stamm R. MEGA-Database: one million data since 1972. Appl Occup and Environ Hyg 2001;16(2):159-163 https://doi.org/10.1080/104732201460262
  11. VIOSH Australia at the University of Ballarat. International review of surveillance and control of workplace exposures : NOHSAC Technical Report5: Wellington.; 2006. p. 36-69
  12. Wald PH, Jones JR. Semiconductor manufacturing: an introduction to processes and hazards. Am J Ind Med 1987;11:203-21 https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.4700110209
  13. WGER(The Working group on exposure registers in Europe). Occupational exposure databases - a proposal for core information for workplace exposure measurements on chemical agents. European foundation for the improvement of living and working conditions.; 1996. p. 17-27