Asia Pacific Journal of Business Review

Kyung Hee University Management Research Institute (경희대학교 경영연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Antidumping case in the China's textile industry: A model building approach

  • Zhuo, Jun (Zhejiang University) ;
  • Park, Yong H. (Kyungin Women's University)
  • Received : 2019.02.02
  • Accepted : 2019.02.28
  • Published : 2019.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Anti-dumping instruments among trading partners have been the subject of research by both academicians and practitioners. This study attempts to establish an early-warning model of anti-dumping against Chinese textile exporting companies, which have suffered from anti-dumping regulations and got arbitration awards. After reviewing theories of anti-dumping arbitration, early-warning and relationship marketing, the measuring items and relationship marketing model of Chinese textiles exporters are investigated. Empirical methods are selected based on early-warning theories of companies. Eighty percent of 156 valid questionnaires by surveys and interviews are used as training data via Binary-Logistic regression while the other twenty percent are validated in the model. As a result, a proper early-warning model has been established.

Keywords

References

  1. Blonigen, B.A.& Prusa,T.J. (2002), Antidumping investigations and the Pass- Through of Antidumping Duties and Exchange Rates [J].The American Economic Review, 92(4): 1044-1062 https://doi.org/10.1257/00028280260344597
  2. Czinkota, M.R. & Kotabe, M.A (1997), Marketing perspective of the U.S. International trade commissions antidumping actions: an empirical inquiry, Journal of World Business, 32(2): 169-187 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-9516(97)90006-7
  3. Feaver, D.& Wilson, K.(2004), Modelling Contigent Protection. Australian Economic Papers, 88-100
  4. Harald,W. (2005),The European Community's Anti-dumping System: Salient Features, Journal of World Trade, 39(4): 787-794
  5. Jianguo, X. (2006), Economic impact, political differences and system frictions, The Journal of Management World, No. 12, pp. 37-44.
  6. Knetter, M. and Prusa, T. (2003), Macroeconomic factors and antidumping filings: evidence from four countries, Journal of International Economics, Vol. 61, pp. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(02)00080-6
  7. Krupp, C. (1994), Antidumping cases in the US chemical industry: a panel data approach, Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 42, pp. 299-311. https://doi.org/10.2307/2950572
  8. Payne, A., Ballantyne. D & Christopher, M. A. (2005), Stakeholder approach to relationship marketing strategy: The development and use of the "six markets" model, European Journal of Marketing, 39(7/8): 855-871 https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560510601806
  9. Prusa, T. (2001), "On the spread and impact of antidumping", Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 34, pp. 591-611. https://doi.org/10.1111/0008-4085.00090
  10. Sohn, C. (2005),Treatment of non-market economy countries under the world trade organization anti-dumping regime, Journal of World Trade, 39(4): 763-786
  11. Wang, Jinjin, Wang, Zhengxin, Li, Qin. (2017), Grey Systems, Bingley Vol. 7, Iss. 2, 272-285.
  12. Xiang, Hongjin, Feng Zongxian, Liu Xuyuan (2011), Research on early warning system for antidumping petition: based on panel data logit model, Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, Bingley Vol. 4, Iss. 3, 158-172. https://doi.org/10.1108/17544401111178203