Asia Pacific Journal of Business Review

Kyung Hee University Management Research Institute (경희대학교 경영연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Do Earnings Manipulations Matter Differently in Different Markets of China? Cost of Capital Consequences

  • Received : 2019.05.22
  • Accepted : 2019.08.10
  • Published : 2019.08.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study investigates whether and how a firm's cost of equity capital is influenced by the extent of a firm's real earnings management (REM). Using a large sample of Hong Kong and Chinese firms over the 9-year period 2009-2017, we find that our implied cost of equity estimates are positively associated with both the extent of REM and the extent of accrual-based earnings management (AEM), but the positive association is stronger for REM than for AEM. We also provide evidence suggesting that the effect of AEM and REM on the cost of equity is more pronounced for Hong Kong firms than Chinese firms, and within Chinese firms, it is less pronounced for the state-owned enterprises (SOEs). Collectively, our results suggest that while both REM and AEM exacerbate the quality of earnings used by outside investors, REM does so to a greater extent than AEM, and thus the market demands a higher risk premium for REM activities than for AEM activities and that this cost of capital-increase effect is more prominent in a developed market like Hong Kong and mitigated by state ownership in China because of investors' expectations for a lower level of detriments to firm fundamentals by REM due to government's protection in a less developed market like China.

Keywords

References

  1. Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., D. Collins, W. Kinney, and R. LaFond. 2009. The effect of SOX internal control deficiencies on firm risk and cost of equity. Journal of Accounting Research 47: 1-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00315.x
  2. Baginski, S., and J. Whalen. 2003. Residual income, risk, intrinsic values, and share prices. The Accounting Review 78: 327-351. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2003.78.1.327
  3. Bharath, S., J. Sunder, and S. Sunder. 2008. Accounting quality and debt contracting. The Accounting Review 83: 1-28. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.1.1
  4. Bhattacharya, U., H. Daouk, and M. Welker. 2003. The world price of earnings opacity. The Accounting Review 78(3): 641-678. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2003.78.3.641
  5. Botosan, C., and M. Plumlee. 2005. Assessing alternative proxies for the expected risk premium. The Accounting Review 80: 21-53. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2005.80.1.21
  6. Botosan, C., and M. Plumlee. 2013. Are information attributes priced? Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 40(9-10): 1045-1067. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12044
  7. Chen, H., J. Chen, G. Lobo, and Y. Wang. 2011. Effects of audit quality on earnings management and cost of equity capital: Evidence from China. Contemporary Accounting Research 28(3): 892-925. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01088.x
  8. Choi, J., J. Kim, X. Liu, and D. Simunic. 2008. Audit pricing, legal liability regimes, and Big 4 premiums: Theory and cross-country evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(1), 55-99. https://doi.org/10.1506/car.25.1.2
  9. Claus, J., and J. Thomas. 2001. Equity premia as low as three percent? Evidence from analysts’ earnings forecasts for domestic and international stock markets. Journal of Finance 56: 1629-1666. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00384
  10. Cohen, D., A. Dey, and T. Lys. 2008. Real and accrual-based earnings management in the pre- and post-Sarbanes-Oxley periods. The Accounting Review 83: 757-787. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.3.757
  11. Cohen, D., and P. Zarowin. 2010. Accrual-based and real earnings management activities around seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 50: 2-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.01.002
  12. Core, J., W. Guay, and R. Verdi. 2008. Is accruals quality a priced risk factor? Journal of Accounting and Economics 46: 2-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2007.08.001
  13. Cull, R., and L. Xu. 2003. Who gets credit? The behavior of bureaucrats and state banks in allocating credit to Chinese state-owned enterprises. Journal of Development Economics 71: 533-559. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(03)00039-7
  14. De, S., and P. Sen. 2002. Legal liabilities, audit accuracy and the market for audit services. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 29(3&4), 353-410. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5957.00435
  15. Dechow, P., and I. Dichev. 2002. The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review 77: 35-59. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.35
  16. Dechow, P., R. Sloan, and A. Sweeney. 1995. Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review 70: 193-225.
  17. Dhaliwal, D., L. Krull, and O. Li. 2007. Did the 2003 Tax Act reduce the cost of equity capital? Journal of Accounting and Economics 43: 121-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.07.001
  18. Easley, D., and M. O’Hara. 2004. Information and the cost of capital. Journal of Finance 59: 1553-1583. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00672.x
  19. Easton, P. 2004. PE ratios, PEG ratios, and estimating the implied expected rate of return on equity capital. The Accounting Review 79: 73-96. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2004.79.1.73
  20. Easton, P., and S. Monahan. 2005. An evaluation of accounting-based measures of expected returns. The Accounting Review 80: 501-538. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2005.80.2.501
  21. Easton, P., and G. Sommers. 2007. Effect of analysts’ optimism on estimates of the expected rate of return implied by earnings forecasts. Journal of Accounting Research 45: 983-1025. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2007.00257.x
  22. Easton, P., G. Taylor, P. Shroff, and T. Sougiannis. 2002. Using forecasts of earnings to simultaneously estimate growth and the rate of return on equity investment. Journal of Accounting Research 40: 657-676. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00066
  23. Ewert, R., and A. Wagenhofer. 2005. Economic effects of tightening accounting standards to restrict earnings management. The Accounting Review 80: 1101-1124. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2005.80.4.1101
  24. Fama, E., and K. French. 1997. Industry costs of equity. Journal of Financial Economics 43: 153-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(96)00896-3
  25. Fama, E., and J. MacBeth. 1973. Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests. Journal of Political Economy 81: 607-636. https://doi.org/10.1086/260061
  26. Francis, J., R. LaFond, P. Olsson, and K. Schipper. 2004. Cost of equity and earnings attributes. The Accounting Review 79: 967-1010. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2004.79.4.967
  27. Francis, J., R. LaFond, P. Olsson, and K. Schipper. 2005. The market pricing of accruals quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39: 295-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.06.003
  28. Francis, J., and D. Wang. 2008. The joint effect of investor protection and Big 4 audits on earnings quality around the world. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(1), 157-191. https://doi.org/10.1506/car.25.1.6
  29. Frankel, R., and C. Lee. 1998. Accounting valuation, market expectation, and cross-sectional stock returns. Journal of Accounting and Economics 25: 283-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(98)00026-3
  30. Fudenberg, D., and J. Tirole. 1995. A theory of income and dividend smoothing based on incumbency rents. Journal of Political Economy 103: 75-93. https://doi.org/10.1086/261976
  31. Gebhardt, W., C. Lee, and B. Swaminathan. 2001. Toward an implied cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research 39: 135-176. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00007
  32. Gode, D., and P. Mohanram. 2003. Inferring the cost of capital using the Ohlson-Juettner model. Review of Accounting Studies 8: 399-431. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027378728141
  33. Graham, J., C. Harvey, and S. Rajgopal. 2005. The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 40: 3-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.01.002
  34. Hail, L., and C. Leuz. 2006. International differences in the cost of equity capital: Do legal institutions and securities regulation matter? Journal of Accounting Research 44: 485-531. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2006.00209.x
  35. Healy, P., and J. Wahlen. 1999. A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons 13(4): 365-383. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.1999.13.4.365
  36. Hughes, J., J. Liu, and J. Liu. 2007. Information asymmetry, diversification, and cost of capital. The Accounting Review 82: 705-729. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2007.82.3.705
  37. Jones, J. 1991. Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research 29: 193-228. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491047
  38. Khurana, I., and K. Raman. 2004. Litigation risk and the financial reporting credibility of Big 4 versus non-Big 4 audits: Evidence from Anglo-American countries. The Accounting Review, 79(2), 473-495. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2004.79.2.473
  39. Kim, J., and B. Sohn. 2013. Real earnings management and cost of capital. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 32(6): 518-543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2013.08.002
  40. Kothari, S., A. Leone, and C. Wasley. 2005. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39: 163-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.11.002
  41. Lambert, R., C. Leuz, and R. Verrecchia. 2007. Accounting information, disclosure, and the cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research 45: 385-420. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2007.00238.x
  42. O’Hanlon, J., and A. Steele. 2000. Estimating the equity risk premium using accounting fundamentals. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 27: 1051-1084. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5957.00346
  43. O'Hara, M. 2003. Presidential address: Liquidity and price discovery. Journal of Finance 58: 1335-1354. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00569
  44. Ohlson, J., and B. Juettner-Nauroth. 2005. Expected EPS and EPS growth as determinants of value. Review of Accounting Studies 10: 349-365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-005-1535-3
  45. Pauwels, K., J. Silva-Risso, S. Srinivasan, and D. Hanssens. 2004. New products, sales promotions, and firm value: The case of automobile industry. Journal of Marketing 68: 142-156. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.4.142.42724
  46. Ramanna, K., and S. Roychowdhury. 2010. Elections and discretionary accruals: Evidence from 2004. Journal of Accounting Research 48: 445-475. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2010.00373.x
  47. Roychowdhury, S. 2006. Earnings management through real activities manipulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 42: 335-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.01.002
  48. Stein, J. 1989. Efficient capital markets, inefficient firms: A model of myopic corporate behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics (November): 655-669.
  49. Taylor, M., and D. Simon. 1999. Determinants of audit fees: the importance of litigation, disclosure, and regulatory burdens in audit engagements in 20 countries. The International Journal of Accounting, 34(3), 375-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7063(99)00017-5
  50. Xu, L. 1998. How China's government and state enterprises partitioned property and control rights. Economic Development and Cultural Change 46: 537-560. https://doi.org/10.1086/452357
  51. Zang, A., 2012. Evidence on the trade-off between real activities manipulation and accrual-based earnings management. The Accounting Review 87, 675-703. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10196