DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative Analysis on Domestic and Overseas Design Guidelines for Aging in place

지속적 거주(Aging in place)를 위한 국내·외 주택설계지침의 비교

  • 김혜신 (경남연구원 공공투자개발관리센터) ;
  • 박수빈 (부산대학교 주거환경학과 및 노인생활환경연구소)
  • Received : 2019.03.18
  • Accepted : 2019.08.16
  • Published : 2019.09.30

Abstract

Domestic and international laws and regulations on design of residential environment are adopted, revised and supplemented to solve the problems such as access, safety and privacy in the residential space of the elderly and the disabled. This study is an comparative analysis of Korea and Japan, USA, UK laws and regulations on environment design by literature review. The purpose of this study is to present the basic materials required for development of the standard that would supports the undiscriminatory physical environment for the socially weak who are experiencing aging and disability, due to the restricted scope of entrance, bathroom and kitchen spaces with high frequency of safety accident. The results of this study are as follows. (1) Design guidelines on residential environment were compared under five residential factors for aging in place: safety, accessibility, amenity, usability and privacy. (2) The guidelines of each country applied to the entrance, bathroom and kitchen space were compared. (3) The results showed present guidelines should be completed with 'safety', 'accessibility', 'amenity', 'usability' and 'privacy' for Aging in place.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 부산대학교

References

  1. Chun, J. H., & Jeung, H. R. (1999). An Evaluation of Korean Accessibility Standards Supporting the People with Disabilities, Journal of korean society of design science, 12(3), 167-176.
  2. Chang, K. Y., & Kang, J. M. (2005). The Study of Activities of Daily Living Performance and Quality of Life for Elderly Residents in the Daejeon City, The Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 13(1), 45-56.
  3. Jeong, J. H. (2004). A Study on Residential Planing Guidelines for Seniors' Well-Being, The Journal of social welfare, 27, 49-69.
  4. Lee, T. K., Kwon, S. J., Oh, E. J., Kim, S. G., Kim, S. J., & Kim, N. S. (2006). A Study on the Dimensional Standardization Process of Dwelling for the Elderly, Korea Institute of Healthcare Architecture Journal, 12(2), 93-102.
  5. Hwang, E. K. (2008). A Study on the Analysis of the Problems between Design Guidelines of the Elderly Housing, The Architectural Institute of Korea, 24(9), 19-26.
  6. Lee, H. S., Choi, Ch. H., & Lee, T. K. (2010a). A Comparative Study on The Barrier Free Dwelling Guidelines of Domestic and Foreign Countries - Focused on Entrance, Bedroom and living room, Korea Institute of Healthcare Architecture Journal, 16(1), 65-75.
  7. Lee, H. S., Choi, Ch. H., & Lee, T. K. (2010b). A Comparative Study on The Barrier Free Dwelling Guidelines of Domestic and Foreign Countries - Focused on Kitchen, Toilet and Bathing Room, Korea Institute of Healthcare Architecture Journal, 26(27), 75-84.
  8. Lee, Y. S., Lim, H. J., Lee, J. H., & Ahn, Ch. H. (2013). A Study on Relations between Deterioration of Physical Functions due to Aging and Bathroom Design Guidelines for the Elderly, Journal of Korean Institute of Interior Design, 22(5), 188-198. https://doi.org/10.14774/JKIID.2013.22.5.188
  9. Park, J. H. (2013). Independence in Late Adulthood, Korean Journal of Research in Gerontology, 22, 95-114.
  10. Lee, H. S. (2017). A Study on the Anthropometrical Method of Minimum Residential Space Standard for the Super-Aged Society of Korea-by Anthropometrical Data Application Methods of Karl H. E. Kroemer, Korea Institute of Healthcare Architecture Journal, 23(1), 15-24.
  11. Song, Y. S., Bae, N. K., & Cho, Y. Ch. (2015). Age-Related Physical Function(ADL, IADL) and its Related Factors of Elderly People in Korea, Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 16(3), 2002-2011. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2015.16.3.2002
  12. Kim, H. J. (2000). Design solutions for retirement housing, Kyung Chun Sa.
  13. Kim, Y. (2009). Housing and Welfare Facilities for the Elderly, SB21.
  14. Park, S. H. (2013). Aging and Vision Loss, Hakjisa.
  15. Lee, Y. S. (1998). Interior Environment and Behavior, Yon-Sei University Press.
  16. UNHabitat. (2014). The Right to Adequate Housing
  17. Korea Consumer Agency(2015). A Trend Analysis of Safety Accident for the Elderly.
  18. Act on the Guarantee of Promotion of Convenience of Persons with Disabilities, Elderly People, Pregnant Women, ETC(Enactment 1997, Revision 2015 ; 2016). http://www.law.go.kr
  19. KS P1509. (Enactment 2006, Revision2014). http://www.kats.go.kr
  20. 長壽對策關係閣僚會議(Enactment 1995), 高齢者居住安定法(Enactment 2001, Revision 2011). http://www.mlit.go.jp
  21. Fair Housing Accessibility Guideline(Enactment 1996, Revision1998). http://www.huduser.gov/publications/fairhousing/fairfull.pdf
  22. ADA-ABAAG. (Enactment 2004, Revision 2014). https://www.accessboard.gov/guidelines-and-standards/buildings-and-sites/about-the-ada-standards/background/ada-aba-accessibility-guidelines-2014.
  23. Lifetime Home Standard. (Enactment 1991, Revision 2013). http://www.lifetimehomes.org.uk.
  24. Part M. (Enactment 2004, Revision 2015 ; 2016). http://www.planningportal.gov.uk/buildingregulations/approveddocuments/partm.