International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology

Research Institute for Knowledge Content Development & Technology (건국대학교 지식콘텐츠연구소)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Researcher's Perception Survey for Facilitating International Joint Research

  • Noh, Younghee (Department of Library and Information Science, Konkuk University) ;
  • Shin, Youngji (Institute of Knowledge Content Development and Technology, Konkuk University)
  • Received : 2019.07.25
  • Accepted : 2019.09.09
  • Published : 2019.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, we wanted to investigate and analyze the current status of international joint research conducted on researchers who have actually conducted or are doing international joint research and to identify difficulties in promoting international joint research based on this study and propose ways to promote future international joint research. As a result, autonomy of research subjects needs to be guaranteed for the revitalization of international joint research, establishment of international joint research guidelines and contract legal infrastructure, simplification and unification of administrative work system and supplementation of performance-related regulations will be necessary.

Keywords

References

  1. Byun, Y. H., & Park, N. (2018). Analysis of International Joint Research into New and Renewable Energy Technology. New & Renewable Energy, 14(1), 4-11. https://doi.org/10.7849/ksnre.2018.3.14.1.004
  2. Cho, H. H., & Ryu, S. H. (1995). Current Status and Improvement of National R&D Projects. Science and technology policy trend, 5(9), 42-51.
  3. Jeon, E., & Yi, C. G. (2018). Policy Directions to Induce Collaborative Research among Korean Domestic Biotechnology Researchers by Applying Co-author Network Analysis. Journal of Institute for Social Sciences, 29(1), 85-109.
  4. Kang, S. J., & Kim, M. J. (2016). The Policy Proposal for the Security of Research Achievements Performing the International Cooperative Research in an Age of Open Innovation. InHa Law Review, 57(3), 91-127.
  5. Kim, K. H., Chae, M., Shim, W., & Kwon, O. (2012). An Evaluation for quality of performance of international R&D cooperation by analyzing patent information. Journal of Korea technology innovation society, 15(3), 722-743.
  6. Kim, T. H. (2012). A Study on the Way to Enhance Research Performance out of the International Joint Projects under the Framework of National R&D Programs, Focusing Basic and Fundamental Technology. Journal of Korea technology innovation society, 15(2), 400-420.
  7. Kim, T. H. (2015). A Study on the Policy Development for International Joint Research: Focusing Network Analysis among Domestic Research Institutes at the Fields of Basic and Fundamental Research. Journal of Policy Development, 15(2), 31-53. https://doi.org/10.35224/kapd.2015.15.2.002
  8. Kim, W. J., & Chung, Y. M. (2010). A Study on Research Collaboration Among Asian Countries in Science and Technology. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 27(3), 103-123. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.3.103
  9. Yang, S. W. (2011). Collaborative Research Agreements between Industry and University and Legal Issues related to IPRs Practice. The Journal of Intellectual property, 6(2), 1-37.
  10. Yoon, J. M. (2009). A Study on the Improvement of Product Management System in International Collaborative Research. Journal of Korea technology innovation society, 12(3), 499-524.
  11. Yu, H. S., & Kim, Y. M. (2016). Analysis of new industry global joint research activities. Korea Technology Innovation Society. In Proceedings of the meeting of the Korea Technology Innovation Society, 2016(11), 565-581.
  12. Yu, H. S., Kim, Y. M., & Yang, C. S. (2017). Analysis of Global Joint Research Activities by Top Researchers in Korea. In Proceedings of the meeting of the Korea Technology Innovation Society, 2017(11), 1225-1246.
  13. Yu, S., Yim, D. S., Park, I., & Youn, J. (1999). A Policy Research on Korea's International Cooperative R&D Activities. Sejong: Science and Technology Policy Institute.