지역사회간호학회지 (Research in Community and Public Health Nursing)

  • 제30권3호
  • /
  • Pages.357-367
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 1225-9594(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-4203(eISSN)
한국지역사회간호학회 (Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

직장여성의 연도별 출산 계획 변화 및 관련요인 분석

An Analysis of Factors associated with Annual Trends in Childbirth Plans by Female Workers

  • 이지선 (듀크대학교 간호대학) ;
  • 정혜선 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실)
  • 투고 : 2018.11.15
  • 심사 : 2019.08.22
  • 발행 : 2019.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: The aim of this study is to identify factors of Korean female workers' childbirth plans and to establish measures to improve the childbirth plan. Methods: Study subjects were selected part in the 1st, 3rd, and 5th year surveys of the Korean Longitudinal Panel Survey of Women and Families. The selection criteria were as follows: women who had a spouse; were salaried workers currently employed for the last one month; belonged to a childbearing age; and had less than 3 children. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to investigate factors associated with childbirth plans. Results: Childbirth plans by female workers decreased each year. The analysis of associated factors revealed that age, number of children were associated factors in all years. In addition, education, satisfaction about dividing household chores with the husband, and satisfaction about working environment were associated with the lack of planning for childbirth in female workers in the 1st survey year. Satisfaction about dividing household chores with the husband, family-work conflict, and satisfaction about the potential for personal development were associated factors in the 3rd survey year. Finally, family-work conflict, satisfaction about employment stability, and satisfaction about job task at work were associated factors in the 5th survey year. Conclusion: It is important to know the measures focusing on the lack of planning for childbirth, and hence these factors can be improved by assessing in general, family, and occupational characteristics. Additionally, employer policies regarding women employees who are pregnant or have children at home need to be reviewed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Statistics Korea. Total fertility rate [Internet]. Daejeon: Statistics Korea. 2017 [cited 2018 August 31] Available from: http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_2KAA207&vw_cd=MT_RTITLE&list_id=ZTIT_B&scrId=&seqNo=&lang_mode=ko&obj_var_id=&itm_id=&conn_path=K1&path=%25EC%25A3%25BC%25EC%25A0%259C%25EB%25B3%2584%2520%25EA%25B5%25AD%25EC%25A0%259C%25ED%2586%25B5%25EA%25B3%2584%2520%253E%2520%25EC%259D%25B8%25EA%25B5%25AC%252C%2520%25EA%25B0%2580%25EA%25B5%25AC%25ED%2595%25A9%25EA%25B3%2584%25EC%25B6%259C%25EC%2582%25B0%25EC%259C%25A8#
  2. Lee CH. A decomposition of decline in total fertility rate in Korea: Effects of changes in marriage and marital fertility. Korea Journal of Population Studies. 2012;35(3):117-144.
  3. Statistics Korea. Total fertility rate [Internet]. Daejeon: Statistics Korea. 2017 [cited 2017 August 3]. Available from: http://www.index.go.kr/potal/main/EachDtlPageDetail.do?idx_cd=1428
  4. McDonald P. Low fertility and the state: The efficacy of policy. Population and Development Review. 2006;32(3):485-510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2006.00134.x
  5. Ko SY. Background and implication in underperform of fertility rate. Research Report. Seoul: Hyundai Research Institute; 2014 Feb. Report No.: 14-6(557).
  6. Statistics Korea. Ideal fertility rate [Internet]. Daejeon: Statistics Korea. 2017 [cited 2017 August 3]. Available from: http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=154&tblId=DT_MOGE_1510000872&vw_cd=MT_ZTITLE&list_id=154_15401_2015&scrId=&seqNo=&lang_mode=ko&obj_var_id=&itm_id=&conn_path=K1&path=%25EC%259D%25B8%25EA%25B5%25AC%25C2%25B7%25EA%25B0%2580%25EA%25B5%25AC%2520%253E%2520%25EA%25B0%2580%25EC%25A1%25B1%25EC%258B%25A4%25ED%2583%259C%25EC%25A1%25B0%25EC%2582%25AC%2520%253E%25202015%25EB%2585%2584%25EC%25A0%2581%25EC%25A0%2595%2520%25EC%259E%2590%25EB%2585%2580%25EC%2588%2598
  7. Statistics Korea. Birth rate in 2015 [Internet]. Daejeon: Statistics Korea. 2017 [cited 2017 August 3]. Available from: http://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_nw/2/2/1/index.-board?bmode=read&aSeq=355736
  8. Joung EH, Choi YS. The factors associated with the birth plan for second child and second birth for married women in Korea. Health and Social Welfare Review. 2013;33(1):5-34. https://doi.org/10.15709/hswr.2013.33.1.5
  9. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991;50(2):179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  10. Song YM, Lee JS. Investigation of the causes of low birth-rate: Focused on the change in industrial society and the expansion of the opportunity of women for social activities. Health and Social Welfare Review. 2011;31(1):27-61. https://doi.org/10.15709/hswr.2011.31.1.27
  11. Larsen U, Hollos M. Women's empowerment and fertility decline among the Pare of Kilimanjaro region, Northern Tanzania. Social Science & Medicine. 2003;57(6):1099-1115. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00488-4
  12. Shah I. Fertility and contraception in Europe: The case of low fertility in Southern Europe. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care. 1997;2(1):53-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/13625189709049934
  13. Min HJ, Kim EJ. The timing of births among korean women: Parity differences in childbirths. Korean Journal of Sociology. 2011;45(4):198-222.
  14. Lee SS, Shin IC, Cho NH, Kim HK, Jung YS, Choi EY, et al. Causes of low fertility and policy responses. Research Report. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2005 Dec. Report No.: 2005-30(2)
  15. Statistics Korea. Employment trends for women [Internet]. Daejeon: Statistics Korea. 2017 [cited 2017 March 16]. Available from: http://www.index.go.kr/potal/main/EachDtlPageDetail.do?idx_cd=1497
  16. Perelli-Harris B. The path to lowest-low fertility in Ukraine. Population Studies. 2005;59(1):55-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472052000332700
  17. Park JS. Work-family balance and in working women and its policy implications. Health and Welfare Forum. 2016;(236):18-36.
  18. Hayford SR, Morgan SP. Religiosity and fertility in the United States: The role of fertility intentions. Social Forces. 2008;86(3):1163-1188. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0000
  19. Jang HN, Lee MS. A study on the determinants of married-working women's childbirth intention. Family and Environment Research. 2013;51(4):425-438. https://doi.org/10.6115/fer.2013.51.4.425
  20. Song YM, Lee SJ. Factors affecting evasion of second childbirth among working mothers: Classification using Q methodology. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 2016;16(2):714-728. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2016.16.02.714
  21. Woo WK, Yoo SH, Cho YT. The timing of childbearing and women's age among married women: The case of highly educated women. Korea Journal of Population Studies. 2013;36(4):25-49.
  22. Lee SY. The analysis of the determinants affecting the rise of fertility rates by each parity. Korea Journal of Population Studies. 2009;32(1):51-70.
  23. Statistics Korea. Employment trends for women [Internet]. Daejeon: Statistics Korea. 2018 [cited 2018 Sep 7]. Available from: http://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_nw/2/1/index.board?bmode=read&aSeq=366737
  24. Song YJ. An analysis of married women's fertility plans in Korea. Korean Journal Community Living Science. 2014;25(3):339-347. https://doi.org/10.7856/kjcls.2014.25.3.339
  25. O'Brien KM, Ganginis Del Pino HV, Yoo SK, Cinamon RG, Han YJ. Work, family, support, and depression: Employed mothers in Israel, Korea, and the United States. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 2014;61(3):461-472. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036339
  26. Duncan S. Policy discourses on 'reconciling work and life' in the EU. Social Policy and Society. 2002;1(4):305-314. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474746402004050
  27. Chung SH. Policy responses to low fertility and its problems. Korea Journal of Population Studies. 2015;38(2):113-134.
  28. MBN News. Korean women's employment rate, no improvement in 'career breakdown' phenomenon and below OECD average [Internet]. Seoul: Author; 2017 [cited 2017 Aug 21]. Available from: http://www.mbn.co.kr/pages/news/newsView.php?news_seq_no=3197756
  29. Park SH, Kim SH. The causes of low fertility rate in female workers and women-friendly labor policies. 1st ed. Seoul: New Paradigm Center of a Korea Labor Institute attached; 2008. 220 p.
  30. Oh MH. A study on the birth rate and gender equality policy of Korea and Japan. Journal of Japanese Language and Literature. 2015;65:395-420.