Journal of Technologic Dentistry (대한치과기공학회지)

Korean Academy of Dental Technology (대한치과기공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Surface characteristics and bonding performance of polymer restorative materials for dental CAD/CAM systems

치과 캐드캠 시스템에서 사용되는 고분자 수복재료들의 표면특성과 접착양상

  • Kim, Jae-Hong (Department of Dental Laboratory Science, College of Health Science, Catholic University of Pusan) ;
  • Kim, Ki-Baek (Department of Dental Lab Technology, Daejeon Health Institute of Technology)
  • 김재홍 (부산가톨릭대학교 보건과학대학 치기공학과) ;
  • 김기백 (대전보건대학교 치기공과)
  • Received : 2019.07.22
  • Accepted : 2019.09.09
  • Published : 2019.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the mechanical properties of polymer prosthetic and restorative materials for dental CAD/CAM using two test method; surface characteristics and shear bond strength. Methods: Commercialized CAD/CAM polymer blanks were investigated; One kinds of PMMA, and one PEKK blanks. A total of 20 PMMA and PEKK specimens were prepared, and each group was divided into 10 specimens. Average surface roughness was observed under surface profilometer. The contact angle was measured with a surface electrooptics. The bond strength was evaluated by a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 5mm/min. The data were statistically analyzed using independent t-test and Fisher's exact test(P<0.05). Results: The PMMA and PEKK group showed a significant difference in the shear bond strength with the composite resin(P<0.05). The surface roughness of the PEKK group was higher than that of the PMMA group. The fracture mode were observed in PEKK groups with 50% showing adhesive remnant index score. Conclusion: PEEK is used as substructure material and composite veneering material is applied. PEKK resins will contribute to the development of successful products that will provide structural and aesthetic satisfaction.

Keywords

References

  1. Aguilar Mendoza JA, Rosales Leal JI, Rodriguez Valverde MA, Gonzalez Lopez S, Cabrerizo Vilchez MA. Wettability and bonding of self-etching dental adhesives influence of the smear layer. Dent Mater, 24(7), 994-1000, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.013
  2. Beuer F, Steff B, Naumann M, Sorensen JA. Load-bearing capacity of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures with different computer-aided design (CAD)/computer- aided manufacturing (CAM) fabricated framework materials. Eur J Oral Sci, 116(4), 381-386, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00551.x
  3. Deger S, Sermet B, Comert Z, Bultan O. Effect of different surface treatments on the surface roughness and hardness of dental porcelain. Key Eng Mat, 58(1), 264-268, 2004.
  4. Denry I, Kelly JR. Emerging ceramic-based materials for dentistry. J Dent Res, 93(12), 1235-1242, 2123-2128, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514553627
  5. Dundar M, Ozcan M, Comlekoglu E, Gungor MA, Artunc C. Bond strengths of veneering ceramics to reinforced ceramic core materials. Int J Prosthodont, 18(1), 348-355, 2005.
  6. El Zohairy AA, De Gee AJ, Mohsen MM, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength testing of luting cements to prefabricated CAD/CAM ceramic and composite blocks. Dent Mater, 19(7), 575-583, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00107-0
  7. Faltermeier A, Rosentritt M, Mussig D. Acrylic removable appliances: Comparative evaluation of different post polymerization methods. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 131(3), 301.e16-e22, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.07.019
  8. Fuhrmann G, Steiner M, Freitag-wolf S, Kern M. Resin bonding to three types ofpolyaryletherketones (PAEKs)-Durability and influence of surface conditioning. Dent Mater, 30(3), 357-363, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.12.008
  9. Gardner KH, Hsiao BS, Matheson RR, Wood BA. Structure, crystallization and morphology of poly (aryl ether ketone ketone). Polymer, 33(12), 2483-2495, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(92)91128-O
  10. Geringer J, Tatkiewicz W, Rouchouse G. Wear behavior of PAEK, poly (aryl-ether-ketone), under physiological conditions, outlooks for performing these materials in the field of hip prosthesis. Wear, 271(9), 2793-2803, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2011.05.034
  11. Noh HS, Kim JM, Kim S, Jeong TS. Effect of curing conditions on the monomer elution of orthodontic acrylic resin. J Korean Acad Pediatric Dent, 35(3), 477-484, 2008.
  12. Stawarczyk B, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Jahn D, Sener B, Roos M. Polyetheretherketone-a suitable material for fixed dental prostheses?. J Biomed Mater Res, Part B, Appl Biomater, 101(4), 1209-1616, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.32932
  13. Spencer P, Ye Q, Park J, Topp EM, Misra A, Marangos O. Adhesive/Dentin Interface: The Weak Link in the Composite Restoration. Ann Biomed Eng, 38(6), 1989-2003, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-010-9969-6
  14. Tannous F, Steiner M, Shahin R, Kern M. Retentive forces and fatigue resistance of thermoplastic resin clasps. Dent Mater, 28(3), 273-278, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.016
  15. Uhrenbacher J, Schmidlin PR, Keul C, Eichberger M, Roos M, Gernet W. The effect of surface modification on the retention strength of polyetheretherketone crowns adhesively bonded to dentin abutments. J Prosthet Dent, 112(6), 1489-1497, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.010
  16. Zoidis P, Papathanasiou I. Modified PEEK resinbonded fixed dental prosthesis as an interim restoration after implant placement. J Prosthet Dent, 116(5), 637-641, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.04.024