DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Variety and Visual Cue on PerceivedQuantity and Consumer Attitude toward Participationinto Sales Promotion Events

  • Received : 2019.01.11
  • Accepted : 2019.04.05
  • Published : 2019.04.30

Abstract

Most studies on how people perceive a given quantity of items were conducted with visual cues exclusively and only offered spatial area based explanations, such as spatial estimation and perceptual grouping theories. This article establishes how people perceive a given quantity when only a written description is provided without any visual cues. Across two studies we show that variety decreases perceived quantity when a variety cue is given, while variety increases perceived quantity when a visual cue is not given. This is because people tend to rely heavily on spatial areas when a visual cue is present and because people are prone to confirmation bias when they are provided with no visual cues but only written descriptions. Furthermore, we highlight that quantity perception has a mediation effect on consumers' attitude-the intention to participate in sales promotional events. Lastly, we summarize the article and discuss its contributions, implications, limitations, and suggestions for future research.

Keywords

References

  1. Baumgartner, H. and J. E. M. Steenkamp (1996), "Exploratory Consumer Buying Behavior: Conceptualization and Measurement," International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13, 121-137.
  2. Broniarczyk, Susan M., Wayne D. Hoyer, and Leigh McAlister (1998), "Consumers' Perceptions of the Assortment Offered in a Grocery Category: The Impact of ItemReduction," Journal of Marketing Research, 35 (2), 166-176.
  3. Dehaene, Stanislas (1992), "Varieties of Numerical Abilities," Cognition, 44, 1-42.
  4. Dehaene, Stanislas (1997), The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics, NewYork: Oxford University Press.
  5. Donthu, N. and D. Gilliland (1996), "The Infomercial Shopper," Journal of Advertising Research, 36, 69-76.
  6. Donthu, N. and D. Gilliland (1996), "The Infomercial Shopper," Journal of Advertising Research, 36, 69-76.
  7. Folkes, Valerie and Shashi Matta (2004), "The Effect of Package Shape on Consumers' Judgments of Product Volume: Attention as a Mental Contaminant," Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (2), 390-401.
  8. Frey, D. (1981), "The Effect of Negative Feedback About Oneself and Cost of Information on Preferences for Information About the Source of This Feedback," Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 42-50.
  9. Frick, Robert W. (1987), "The Homogeneity Effect in Counting," Perception and Psychophysics, 41 (1), 8-16.
  10. Frith, Christopher D. and Uta Frith (1972), "The Solitaire Illusion: An Illusion of Numerosity," Perception and Psychophysics, 11 (6), 409-410
  11. Garbarino, Ellen C. and Julie A. Edell (1997), "Cognitive Effort, Affect, and Choice," Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (9), 147-158.
  12. Ginsburg, Norman (1978), "Perceived Numerosity, Item Arrangement, and Expectancy," American Journal of Psychology, 91 (2), 267-273.
  13. Huang, Liqiang, Hal Pashler, and Anne Treisman (2006), "Can We Select Two Colors Simultaneously?" Journal of Vision, 6 (6), 1101a.
  14. Janis, I. L. (1982), "Groupthink (2nd ed., Rev.)," Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 235-246.
  15. Jeong, H. G., Kate Christensen, and Aimee Drolet (2016), The Short-Lived Benefits of Variety Seeking Among the Chronically Indecisive," Journal of Experimental Psychology, 22 (4), 423-435.
  16. Johnston, L. (1996), "Resisting Change: Informationseeking and Stereotype Change," European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 799-825.
  17. Jonas, Eva, Stefan Schulz-Hardt, Dieter Frey, and Norman Thelen (2001), "Confirmation Bias in Sequential Information Search After Preliminary Decisions: An Expansion of Dissonance Theoretical Research on Selective Exposure to Information," Norman Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80 (4), 557-571.
  18. Kaufman, E. L., M. W. Lord, T. W. Reese, and J. Volkman (1949), "The Discrimination of Visual Number," American Journal of Psychology, 62, 498-525.
  19. Krueger, Lester E. (1972), "Perceived Numerosity," Perception and Psychophysics, 11, 5-9.
  20. Mandler, George and Billie Jo Shebo (1982), "Subitizing: An Analysis of Its Component Processes," Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111 (1), 1-22.
  21. Nemeth, C. J., and J. Rogers (1996), Dissent and the Search for Information," British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 67-76.
  22. Nickerson, Raymond S. (1998), "Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises," Review of General Psychology, 2 (2), 175-220.
  23. Piazza, Manuela, Veronique Izard, Philippe Pinel, Denis Le Bihan, and Stanislas Dehaene (2004), "Tuning Curves for Approximate Numerosity in the Human Intraparietal Sulcas," Neuron, 44 (10), 547-555
  24. Pinkley, R. L., T. L. Griffith, and G. B. Northcraft (1995), "Fixed Pie" a La Mode: Information Availability, Information Processing, and the Negotiation of Suboptimal Agreements, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 101-112.
  25. Raghubir, Priya and Aradhna Krishna (1996), "As the Crow Flies: Bias in Consumers' Map-Based Distance Judgments," Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (10), 26-39.
  26. Raghubir, Priya and Aradhna Krishna (1999), "Vital Dimensions in Volume Perception: Can the Eye Fool the Stomach?" Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (3), 313-326.
  27. Redden, Joseph P. and Stephen J. Hoch (2009), "The Presence of Variety Reduces Perceived Quantity," Journal of Consumer Research, 23 (6), 406-417.
  28. Schulz-Hardt, Stefan (1997), "Realitdtsflucht in Entscheidungsprozessen: Von Groupthink Zum Entscheidungsautismus [Loosing Reality in Decision Processes: From Groupthink to Autistic Decision Making]," Bern, Switzerland: Huber.
  29. Schulz-Hardt, Stefan, Dieter Frey, C. Luthgens, and S. Moscovici (2000), "Biased Information Search in Group Decision Making," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 655-669.
  30. Snyder, M. and P. White (1981), "Testing Hypotheses About Other People: Strategies of Verification and Falsification," Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 39-43.
  31. Tversky, Amos and Daniel Kahneman (1974), "Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases," Science, 185 (9), 1124-1131.
  32. Vos, Piet G., Michiel P. van Oeffelen, Hein J. Tibosch, and Juri Allik (1988), "Interactions Between Area and Numerosity," Psychological Research, 50, 148-154.
  33. Yadav, Manjit S. (1994), "How Buyers Evaluate Product Bundles: A Model of Anchoring and Adjustment," Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (9), 342-353.
  34. Yin, Dezhi, Sabyasachi Mitra, and Han Zhang (2016), "When Do Consumers Value Positive vs. Negative Reviews? An Empirical Investigation of Confirmation Bias in Online Word of Mouth," Information Systems Research, 27 (1), 131-144.