DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

우리나라 중서부지역 논 습지에 서식하는 무미 양서류의 서식처 특성 - 대호간척농지의 영농방법 중심으로 -

Habitat Characteristics of Anuran Species Inhabiting Rice Fields of Western Mid-South Korea - In the Case of Daeho Reclamation Agricultural Land by Farming Practices -

  • 투고 : 2019.11.15
  • 심사 : 2019.12.02
  • 발행 : 2019.12.31

초록

논 습지는 다양한 야생동물들의 주요 서식공간으로, 급격한 개발 및 환경 변화로 인해 논에 서식하는 야생동물의 생물 다양성 보전에 위협이 되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 서해안에 위치한 논 습지를 이용하는 무미 양서류의 서식지 이용 특성을 규명하고자 2018년 3월부터 10월까지 당진시 대호 간척 농지에 서식하는 양서류의 풍부도와 서식 환경을 바탕으로 종들에게 영향을 끼친 주요 환경 요인을 파악하고, 서식지 이용 특성을 알아보았다. 연구 결과 조사지역에서는 금개구리(Pelophylax chosenicus)를 포함하여 참개구리 (P. nigromaculatus)와 청개구리 (Hyla japonica)의 서식이 확인되었다. 3종에 영향을 끼치는 환경 요인으로 기온과 습도, 수심, 미소 서식지로 확인되었고, 청개구리는 수온에 영향을 받고 있었으며, 금개구리는 벼의 길이와 농법의 유형에 영향을 받고 있는 것으로 확인되었다. 3종은 모두 기온과 습도, 수심이 증가할수록 개체수가 증가하는 경향을 보였고, 모내기한 필지를 가장 많이 이용했으며, 번식 시기에는 미소 서식지 요인 중 필지를 가장 선호하고 있어 조사지역이 3종의 주요 번식지로 이용되고 있는 것으로 판단된다. 금개구리는 관행에 비해 친환경 농지에서 더 많이 관찰되었는데, 이는 포식자와 제초작업으로 인한 주변 환경의 차이로 인한 원인으로 보인다. 본 연구를 통해 논에 서식하는 무미 양서류 3종이 선호하는 환경 요인은 종에 따라 다른 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 이 결과는 무미 양서류 보전에 중요한 자료를 제공할 것이다.

Paddy wetlands are a critical habitat for a variety of wild animals, and their rapid development and environmental changes pose a threat to the conservation of agrobiodiversity. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the habitat characteristics of anuran inhabiting paddy wetlands and identify major environmental variables affecting their distributions. The study was conducted in the Daeho reclaimed area in Dangjin, from March to October 2018. In this study, we found three anuran species (Pelophylax nigromaculatus, Hyla japonica and Pelophylax chosenicus). The environmental factors affecting the three species were identified as air temperature, humidity, water-depth, and micro-habitats. H. japonica were affected by water temperature, and P. chosenicus were affected by rice height and types of farming practices. All the three species richness was correlated with air temperature, humidity, and water-depth positively, and the three species used rice transplanted paddy fields the most. It was also found that paddy is the most preferred of the micro-habitats during the breeding season, so the survey area is considered to be used as the major breeding sites for the three species. P. chosenicus were more observed on environmental-friendly paddy fields than conventional paddy fields, which appears to be differences in their surroundings environment caused by predators and weeding. It will be needed to identify their relationship with predators, their preferred food resources and the richness and diversity of wild vegetation around paddy wetlands.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bates, D., M. Machler, B. Bolker and S. Walker. 2014. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.5823.
  2. Borzee, A., C.N. Kyong, H.K. Kil and Y. Jang. 2018. Impact of water quality on the occurrence of two endangered Korean anurans: Dryophytes suweonensis and Pelophylax chosenicus. Herpetologica 74(1): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1655/Herpetologica-D-17-00011
  3. Both, C., M. Sole, T.G. Santos and S.Z. Cechin. 2009. The role of spatial and temporal descriptors for neotropical tadpole communities in southern Brazil. Hydrobiologia 624: 125-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-008-9685-5
  4. Butler, S.J., D. Brooks, R.E. Feber, J. Storkey, J.A. Vickery and K. Norris. 2009. A cross-taxonomic index for quantifying the health of farmland biodiversity. Journal of Applied Ecology 46(6): 1154-1162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01709.x
  5. Choi, Y.S. 2008. Foraging Ecology and Habitat Preference of Tree-nesting Ardeidae in Korea. Ph.D. thesis. Kyung Hee University. Seoul.
  6. COP10, R. 2008. Enhancing biodiversity in rice paddies as wetland systems. In: 10th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar, Iran, 1971).
  7. Do, M.S., H.J. Jang, D.I. Kim, K.S. Koo, S.C. Lee and H.K. Nam. 2018. The study on habitat analysis and ecological niche of Korean Brown Frogs (Rana dybowskii, R. coreana and R. huanrensis) using the species distribution model. Korean Journal of Herpetology 9: 1-11.
  8. Do, M.S., J.W. Lee, H.J. Jang, D.I. Kim, J. Park and J.C. Yoo. 2017. Spatial distribution pattern and prediction of hotspot area for endangered herpetofauna species in Korea. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 31(4): 381-396. https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2017.31.4.381
  9. Do, M.S. 2014. Prediction of Distribution Tendency of Amphibians in South Korea According to Climate Change using MaxEnt Modeling. The 8th international conference of Kyung Hee University. 200-217.
  10. Duellman, W.E. and L. Trueb. 1986. Biology of Amphibians. McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, New York.
  11. Duellman, W.E. 1988. Patterns of species diversity of anuran amphibians in the American tropics. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 75: 79-104. https://doi.org/10.2307/2399467
  12. Elphick, C.S. and L.W. Oring. 1998. Winter management of Californian rice fields for waterbirds. Journal of Applied Ecology 35(1): 95-108. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.1998.00274.x
  13. Feber, R.E., L.G. Firbank, P.J. Johnson and D.W. Macdonald. 1997. The effects of organic farming on pest and non-pest butterfly abundance. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 64(2): 133-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(97)00031-5
  14. Finlayson, C.M., N.C. Davidson, A.G. Spiers and N.J. Stevenson. 1999. Global wetland inventory-current status and future priorities. Marine and Freshwater Research 50(8): 717-727. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF99098
  15. Fujioka, M. and S.J. Lane. 1997. The impact of changing irrigation practices in rice fields on frog populations of the Kanto Plain, central Japan. Ecological Research 12(1):101-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02523615
  16. Fujioka, M. 2001. The potential and problems of agricultural ecosystems for birds in Japan. Global Environmental Research 5: 151-161.
  17. Fuller, R.J., L.R. Norton, R.E. Feber, P.J. Johnson, A.C. Joys, F. Mathews, R.C. Stuart, M.C. Townsend, W.J. Manley, M.S. Wolfe, D.W. Macdonald and L.G. Firbank. 2005. Benefits of organic farming to biodiversity vary among taxa. Biology Letters 1: 431-434. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2005.0357
  18. Goldberg, F.J., S. Quinzio and M. Vaira. 2006. Oviposition-site selection by the toad Melanophryniscus rubriventris in an unpredictable environment in Argentina. Canadian Journal of Zoology 84(5): 699-705. https://doi.org/10.1139/z06-038
  19. Hazell, D., J.M. Hero, D. Lindenmayer and R. Cunningham. 2004. A comparison of constructed and natural habitat for frog conservation in an Australian agricultural landscape. Biological Conservation 119(1): 61-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2003.10.022
  20. Hirai, T. and M. Matsui. 1999. Feeding habits of the pond frog, Rana nigromaculata, inhabiting rice fields in Kyoto, Japan. Copeia 1999(4): 940-947. https://doi.org/10.2307/1447969
  21. Hirai, T. and M. Matsui. 2002. Feeding relationships between Hyla japonica and Rana nigromaculata in rice fields of Japan. Journal of Herpetology 36(4): 662-667. https://doi.org/10.1670/0022-1511(2002)036[0662:FRBHJA]2.0.CO;2
  22. Jang, H.J. and J.H. Suh. 2010. Distribution of amphibian species in South Korea. Korean Journal of Herpetology 2: 45-51.
  23. Katayama, N., T. Amano, G. Fujita and H. Higuchi. 2012. Spatial overlap between the intermediate egret Egretta intermedia and its aquatic prey at two spatiotemporal scales in a rice paddy landscape. Zoological Studies 51: 1105-1112.
  24. Katayama, N., T. Goto, F. Narushima, T. Amano, H. Kobori and T. Miyashita. 2013. Indirect positive effects of agricultural modernization on the abundance of Japanese tree frog tadpoles in rice fields through the release from predators. Aquatic Ecology 47(2): 225-234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-013-9437-0
  25. Kato, N., M. Yoshio, R. Kobayashi and T. Miyashita. 2010. Differential responses of two anuran species breeding in rice fields to landscape composition and spatial scale. Wetlands 30(6): 1171-1179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-010-0103-1
  26. Kim, S.K., H.S. Park and S.R. Park. 2016. Distribution of fish and amphibian in rice fields near the Yedang Reservoir in Korea. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 30(1): 48-57. https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2016.30.1.048
  27. Koo, K.S., S. Kwon, I.K. Park and H.S. OH. 2018. Relationship between body size variation and habitat environment of Hyla japonica in Jeju Island, South Korea. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 32(6): 575-581. https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2018.32.6.575
  28. Koo, K.S. 2019. Distribution characteristics and body size variation of Japanese Tree Frog (Hyla japonica) in South Korea. Ph.D. thesis. Kangwon national university. Chuncheon.
  29. KREI. 2003. The agricultural and rural history of Korea for 100 years : change and development of Korean rural society. Korea Rural Economic Institute. Seoul.
  30. Lee, J.H., H.J. Jang and J.H. Suh. 2011. Ecological Guide Book of Herpetofauna in Korea. NIER. Incheon.
  31. Lee, S.H. and J.E. Jung. 2008. Management Effect of Environment-friendly Agriculture Pilot Site : A Case Study on Project Office of DaeHoo Environment. Korea Rural Community Corporation (KRC). Ansan.
  32. Liess, M. and P.C. Von Der Ohe. 2005. Analyzing effects of pesticides on invertebrate communities in streams. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry: An International Journal 24: 954-965. https://doi.org/10.1897/03-652.1
  33. Maeda, N. and M. Matsui. 1989. Frogs and Toads of Japan (Third edition). Bun-ichi Co., Ltd. Tokyo.
  34. Moreira, L.F.B. and L. Maltchik. 2014. Does organic agriculture benefit anuran diversity in rice fields?. Wetlands 34(4): 725-733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-014-0537-y
  35. Naito, R., M. Sakai, Y. Natuhara, Y. Morimoto and S. Shibata. 2013. Microhabitat use by Hyla japonica and Pelophylax porosa brevipoda at levees in rice paddy areas of Japan. Zoological Science 30(5): 386-392. https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.30.386
  36. Naito, R., M. Yamasaki, Y. Natuhara and Y. Morimoto 2012. Effects of water management, connectivity, and surrounding land use on habitat use by frogs in rice paddies in Japan. Zoological Science 29(9): 577-585. https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.29.577
  37. Nam, H.K., M. Kim, G. Choi, D. Jang, S.H. Choi, K.J. Cho, L.J. Choe, Y.E. Na and M.H. Kim. 2016. Influence of pesticide use on distribution of waterbirds in rice fields at mid-western part of South Korea. Korean Journal of Environmental Biology 34(4): 361-364. https://doi.org/10.11626/KJEB.2016.34.4.361
  38. Nam, H.K., S.H. Choi and J.C. Yoo. 2015. Patterning waterbird assemblages on rice fields using self-organizing map and random forest. Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture 34(3): 168-177. https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2015.34.3.26
  39. Noh, D.C. 2007. Environmental Monitoring by using Anuran Calls. Ph.D. thesis, Korea national university of education. Cheongju.
  40. Peltzer, P.M., R.C. Lajmanovich, A.M. Attademo and A.H. Beltzer. 2006. Diversity of anurans across agricultural ponds in Argentina, pp. 131-145. In: Marine, Freshwater, and Wetlands Biodiversity Conservation. Springer, Dordrecht.
  41. Piatti, L., F.L. Souza and P.L. Filho. 2010. Anuran assemblage in a rice field agroecosystem in the Pantanal of central Brazil. Journal of Natural History 44(19-20): 1215-1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930903499804
  42. R Core Team. 2013. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at http://www.R-project.org/.
  43. Ra, N.Y. 2010. Habitat and Behavioral Characteristics, Captive Breeding and Recovery Strategy of the Endangered Gold-Spotted Pond Frog (Rana plancyi chosenica). Ph.D. thesis. Kangwon national university. Chuncheon.
  44. Resetaris, W.J. 2005. Habitat selection behaviour links local and regional scales in aquatic systems. Ecology Letters 8: 480-486. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00747.x
  45. Sawahata, T. 2002. Seasonal changes in number of Rana porosa brevipoda killed on the road. Bulletin of the Herpetol Society of Japan 2: 72-74.
  46. Schmidt, B.R. 2004. Declining amphibian populations: The pitfalls of count data in the study of diversity, distributions, dynamics, and demography. Herpetological Journal 14: 167-174.
  47. Shin, H.S, Y.J. Song, S.I. Kwon, J. Eo, S.H. Lee and M.H. Kim. 2018. Monthly change of the length-weight relationship of the loach (Misgurnus anguillicaudatus) population in paddy fields by farming practices. Korean Journal of Environmental Biology 36(1): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.11626/KJEB.2018.36.1.001
  48. Sung, H.C., S.M. Cha, S.W. Cheong, D.S. Park and S.R. Park. 2007. Monitoring local populations and breeding migration patterns of the gold-spotted pond frog, Rana chosenica. Journal of Ecology and Environment 30(2): 121-126. https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2007.30.2.121
  49. Tiner, R.W. 1984. Wetlands of the United States: current status and recent trends. United States Fish and Wildlife Service.
  50. Wang, Y., Z. Wu, P. Lu, F. Zhang and Y. Li. 2008. Breeding ecology and oviposition site selection of black-spotted pond frogs (Rana nigromaculata) in Ningbo, China. Frontiers of Biology in China 3(4): 530-535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11515-008-0064-4
  51. Watanabe, S., N. Nakanishi and M. Izawa. 2005. Seasonal abundance in the floor-dwelling frog fauna on Iriomote Island of the Ryukyu Archipelago, Japan. Journal of Tropical Ecology 21(1): 85-91. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467404002068
  52. Werner, E.E., D.K. Skelly, R.A. Relyea and K.L. Yurewicz. 2007. Amphibian species richness across environmental gradients. Oikos 116: 1697-1712. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15935.x
  53. Wilson, A.L., R.J. Watts and M.M. Stevens. 2008. Effects of different management regimes on aquatic macroinvertebrate diversity in Australian rice fields. Ecological Research 23(3): 565-572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-007-0410-z
  54. Winqvist, C., J. Bengtsson, T. Aavik, F. Berendse, L.W. Clement, S. Eggers, C. Fischer, A. Flohre, F. Geiger, J. Liira, T. Part, C. Thies, T. Tscharntke, W.W. Weisser and R. Bommarco. 2011. Mixed effects of organic farming and landscape complexity on farmland biodiversity and biological control potential across Europe. Journal of Applied Ecology 48(3): 570-579. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01950.x