The Journal of Korean Physical Therapy

  • 제31권4호
  • /
  • Pages.222-227
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 1229-0475(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-156X(eISSN)
대한물리치료학회 (The Korean Society of Physical Therapy)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of Longitudinal Arch of Foot on the Strength and Muscle Activity of the Abductor Hallucis in Subjects with and without Navicular Drop Sign

  • Jeon, In-Cheol (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Life & Health Science, Hoseo University)
  • 투고 : 2019.07.01
  • 심사 : 2019.08.26
  • 발행 : 2019.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: This study examined the influence of longitudinal arch on the strength and muscle activity of the abductor hallucis in the standing position in subjects with and without navicular drop signs. Methods: A sample of 34 subjects with and without navicular drop signs between 22 and 28 years of age were enrolled in this study. The strength and muscle activity of the abductor hallucis was measured using a tensiometer. The Smart KEMA System and electromyography device was used on the subjects with and without navicular drop signs. Two groups were classified using the navicular drop test to identify the longitudinal arch of the foot. The strength of the abductor hallucis was evaluated in standing, both with and without an external arch support condition. The two-way mixed ANOVA was used. The level of statistical significance was set to ${\alpha}=0.05$. Results: The strength and muscle activity of the abductor hallucis in standing was significantly higher with external arch support than that without the external arch support in the group with navicular drop signs. There was no significant difference in the abductor hallucis strength and muscle activity with and without external arch support in the subjects without navicular drop signs. Conclusions: The strength and muscle activity of the abductor hallucis in standing can be influenced by the external arch support in the group with navicular drop signs. The strength measurement of the abductor hallucis in standing should be separately performed in conditions with and without longitudinal arch of foot.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kisner C, Colby LA. Therapeutic exercise: foundations and techniques. 6th ed., Philadelphia, Fa Davis. 2012
  2. ArinciIncel N, Genc H, Erdem HR et al. Muscle imbalance in hallux valgus: an electromyographic study. AmJ Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 82(5): 345-9.
  3. Sahrmann SA. Diagnosis and treatment of movement impairment syndromes. St. Louis, Mosby. 2001
  4. Ekstrom RA, Donatelli RA, Carp KC. Electromyographic analysis of core trunk, ankle, and thigh muscles during 9 rehabilitation exercises. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007:37(12);754-62. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2007.2471
  5. Leetun DT, Ireland ML., Willson JD et al. Core stability measures as risk factors for lower extremity injury in athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(6):926-34. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000128145.75199.C3
  6. Sahrmann S. Movement system impairment syndromes of the extremities, cervical and thoracic spines-e-book. Amsterdam, Elsevier. 2010
  7. Leinonen V, Kankaanpaa M, Airaksinen O et al. Back and ankle extensor activities during trunk flexion/extension: effects of low back pain and rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(1): 32-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(00)90218-1
  8. Coughlin MJ. Hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78(6):932-66. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199606000-00018
  9. Neumann DA. Kinesiology of the musculoskeletal system-e-book: foundations for rehabilitation. Amsterdam, Elsevier. 2006
  10. Coughlin MJ, Saltzman CL, Nunley JA, Angular measurements in the evaluation of hallux valgus deformities: a report of the ad hoc committee of the american orthopaedic foot & ankle society on angular measurements. Foot Ankle Int. 2002;23(1):68-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070202300114
  11. Mann RA, Coughlin MJ. Adult hallux valgus, surgery of the foot and ankle. 7th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1999.
  12. Jung DY, Kim MH, Koh EK et al, A comparison in the muscle activity of the abductor hallucis and the medial longitudinal arch angle during toe curl and short foot exercises. Phys Ther Sport. 2011;12(1):30-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2010.08.001
  13. Kendall FP, McCreary EK, Provance PG et al. Muscles: testing and function, with posture and pain, 5th ed. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2005.
  14. Wulker N, Mittag F, The treatment of hallux valgus. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012;109(49):857-67.
  15. Bolgla LA, Uhl TL. Electromyographic analysis of ankle rehabilitation exercises in a group of healthy subjects. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005;35(8):487-94. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2005.35.8.487
  16. Tehraninasr A, Saeedi H, Forogh B et al. Effects of insole with toe-separator and night splint on patients with painful hallux valgus: a comparative study. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2008;32(1): 79-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/03093640701669074
  17. Kim MH, Kwon OY, Kim SH et al. Comparison of muscle activities of abductor hallucis and adductor hallucis between the short foot and toe-spread-out exercises in subjects with mild hallux valgus. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2013;26(2):163-8. https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-2012-00363
  18. Heo HJ, Koo YM, Yoo WG, Comparison of selective activation of the abductor hallucis during various exercises. J Phys Ther Sci. 2011;23(6): 915-8 https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.23.915
  19. Lee JE, Park GH, Lee YS et al. A comparison of muscle activities in the lower extremity between flat and normal feet during one-leg standing. J Phys Ther Sci. 2013;25(9):1059-61. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.25.1059
  20. Brenner E. Insertion of the abductor hallucis muscle in feet with and without hallux valgus. Anat Rec. 1999;254(3):429-34. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(19990301)254:3<429::AID-AR14>3.0.CO;2-5
  21. Maughan RJ, Watson JS, Weir J. Strength and cross-sectional area of human skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1983;338:37-49. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014658