DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Reliability of Quantifying Maximal Mouth Opening and Lateral Mandibular Shift in Individuals With and Without Temporomandibular Disorder Using Three-dimensional Ultrasound-based Motion Analysis

  • Oh, Jae-seop (Dept. of Physical Therapy, College of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Inje University) ;
  • Kim, Si-hyun (Dept. of Physical Therapy, Sangji University) ;
  • Kyung, Moon-su (Dept. of Fashion Business, College of Culture and Tourism, Jeonju University) ;
  • Park, Kyue-nam (Dept. of Physical Therapy, College of Medical Science, Jeonju University)
  • Received : 2019.07.29
  • Accepted : 2019.08.30
  • Published : 2019.09.17

Abstract

Background: Although magnetic resonance imaging is accurate, it is expensive to measure the movement of temporomandibular joint. The three-dimensional (3D) motion analysis system is an inexpensive measurement tool. Objects: This study examined the reliability of quantifying the mouth opening and lateral mandibular shift and differences between individuals with and without temporomandibular disorder (TMD) using the hygienic method of surface markers on the skin with 3D ultrasound-based motion analysis. Methods: This study included 24 subjects (12 with and 12 without TMD). Temporomandibular joint motion during mouth opening was recorded using two surface markers with 3D ultrasound-based motion analysis. An intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC (3,k)] was used to confirm the intrarater reliability of quantifying kinematic temporomandibular joint motion, and an independent t-test was used to evaluate differences in maximal mouth opening and lateral mandibular shift between the two groups. Results: Assessment of mouth opening and lateral mandibular shift showed excellent test-retest reliability with low standard error of measurement. The lateral mandibular shift and opening-lateral mandibular shift ratio were significantly increased in the TMD group during maximum mouth opening (p<.05). However, no significant difference in maximal mouth opening was observed between the groups with and without TMD (p>.05). Conclusion: This hygienic and simple surface marker method can be used to quantify the mouth opening and lateral mandibular shift at the end-range of mouth opening. The TMD group showed an increased lateral mandibular shift movement at the end-range of mouth opening. The lateral mandibular shift movement can be regarded as a symptom in the diagnosis and treatment of TMD.

Keywords

References

  1. Baltali E, Zhao KD, Koff MF, et al. A method for quantifying condylar motion in patients with osteoarthritis using an electromagnetic tracking device and computed tomography imaging. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66(5):848-857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.01.021
  2. Cagnie B, Cools A, De Loose V, et al. Reliability and normative database of the zebris cervical range-of-motion system in healthy controls with preliminary validation in a group of patients with neck pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007;30(6):450-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2007.05.003
  3. Farrar WB. Diagnosis and treatment of painful temporomandibular joints. J Prosthet Denyt. 1968;20(4):345-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(68)90231-X
  4. Feteih RM. Signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders and oral parafunctions in urban Saudi arabian adolescents: A research report. Head Face Med. 2006;2:25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-2-25
  5. Friedman MH, Weisberg J. Application of orthopedic principles in evaluation of the temporomandibular joint. Phys Ther. 1982;62(5):597-603. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/62.5.597
  6. Galhardo AP, da Costa Leite C, Gebrim EM, et al. The correlation of research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders and magnetic resonance imaging: A study of diagnostic accuracy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013;115(2):277-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2012.10.020
  7. Grosfeld O, Jackowska M, Czarnecka B. Results of epidemiological examinations of the temporomandibular joint in adolescents and young adults. J Oral Rehabil. 1985;12(2):95-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1985.tb00625.x
  8. Leader JK, Boston JR, Rudy TE, et al. Relation of jaw sounds and kinematics visualized and quantified using 3-D computer animation. Med Eng Phys. 2003;25(3):191-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4533(02)00179-0
  9. Link JJ, Nickerson JW. Temporomandibular joint internal derangements in an orthognathic surgery population. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1992;7(3):161-169.
  10. Look JO, Schiffman EL, Truelove EL, Ahmad M. Reliability and validity of Axis I of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) with proposed revisions. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37(10):744-759. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02121.x
  11. Naeije M, Van der Weijden JJ, Megens CC. OKAS-3D: Optoelectronic jaw movement recording system with six degrees of freedom. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1995;33(5):683-688. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02510786
  12. Okeson JP, de Kanter RJ. Temporomandibular disorders in the medical practice. J Fam Pract. 1996;43(4):347-356.
  13. Poveda Roda R, Bagan JV, Diaz Fernandez JM, et al. Review of temporomandibular joint pathology. Part I: Classification, epidemiology and risk factors. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2007;12(4):E292-E298.
  14. Seedorf H, Seetzen F, Scholz A, et al. Impact of posterior occlusal support on the condylar position. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31(8):759-763. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01421.x
  15. Stegenga B. Nomenclature and classification of temporomandibular joint disorders. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37(10):760-765. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02146.x.
  16. Sureka J, Reddy DV, Karthik AK. Dynamic 3 T MRI of temporomandibular joint in diagnosing a stuck disk. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2012;30(2):158-160. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.99994.
  17. Widmalm SE, Dong Y, Li BX, et al. Unbalanced lateral mandibular deviation associated with TMJ sound as a sign in TMJ disc dysfunction diagnosis. J Oral Rehabil. 2016;43(12):911-920. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12446
  18. Wood GD, Branco JA. A comparison of three methods of measuring maximal opening of the mouth. J Oral Surg. 1979;37(3):175-177.