DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

명상숲의 중요도-만족도 평가 - 광주광역시 중학교를 대상으로 -

Importance-Satisfaction Analysis of Meditation Forest in Schools - Focusing on Middle Schools in Gwang-Ju City -

  • Kang, Taesun (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Honam University) ;
  • Jeong, Moonsun (Dept. of Environmental Landscape Architecture, Cheongju University)
  • 투고 : 2019.07.24
  • 심사 : 2019.08.26
  • 발행 : 2019.08.31

초록

본 연구는 중학교 명상숲의 물리적 환경특성과 이용자들의 이용행태 및 중요도-만족도 등을 분석하여 향후 중학교 명상숲 조성에서 이용자 중심의 설계를 수행하기 위한 기초자료를 제공하는 것에 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 명상숲 대상지의 부지특성, 자연성 기능성, 효과성을 바탕으로 중요도-만족도 분석을 위한 평가지표 24항목을 선정하였다. 광주광역시의 중정형 A, B 중학교 두 곳에서 대상지 현황조사분석과 학생, 교사를 대상으로 설문조사 및 분석을 실시하였다. 연구결과, 첫째 명상숲에 대한 인식과 이용정도는, 두 학교 모두에서 학생의 명상숲 인식정도와 이용률이 교사에 비해 매우 낮게 나타났다. 학교 간 집단비교 결과는 A학교가 B학교에 비해 이용 및 인식정도가 매우 양호하였다. 둘째, 명상숲 이용행태는 휴식(49.6%), 주중 점심시간(63.6%), 친구(65.0%) 또는 동료(60%)와 함께 10분 이하(68.6%)로 이용하는 것으로 나타났다. 꽃이 피는 식물(30.0%)과 녹음수(28.9%)를 좋아하며, 주로 쉼터(57.9%)와 산책로(37.1%)를 이용하였다. 셋째, 중요도, 만족도 분석결과, 전체 24개 항목에 대한 평균은 중요도(3.81)가 만족도(3.62)보다 높았다. I사분면(지속적 유지)의 항목들은 9개, II사분면(우선적 시정)의 항목들은 3개, III사분면(관리운영 시 저우선순위)의 항목들은 7개, IV사분면(과잉노력의 지양)의 항목들은 5개이다. 두 학교 간 만족도에서 통계적으로 유의미한 차이를 보인 16개 항목에 대해서 A학교 만족도가 B학교보다 모두 높게 나타났다. 이는 A학교 명상숲에 규모가 더 큰 숲과 산책로가 확보되어 있고, 접근성이 더 용이하며, 다양한 식재유형 및 식재면적이 제공되고 있어 B학교에 비해 만족도가 더 높은 것으로 판단된다. 넷째, 전반적 만족도 분석결과에서 A학교(68.0%)와 B학교(47.2%) 간 유의한 차이를 보였으며, 이는 A학교의 주요 만족공간인 산책로와 쉼터가 B학교보다 더 잘 조성되어 있어 만족도의 차이가 큰 것으로 판단된다. 전체를 대상으로 한 가장 만족하는 공간의 순위로 산책로(1위), 쉼터(2위)가 선정되었고, 만족하는 이유는 A와 B학교 모두 휴식(스트레스 해소 및 정서함양)이 가장 높게 나타났다.

This study is to provide basic data for the user-oriented design for a middle school meditation forest in the future by analyzing the physical environment characteristics of existing middle school meditation forests, the users' utilization behavior, and the degree of the importance satisfaction. For this purpose, 24 evaluation indices based on site characteristics, naturalness, functionality, and the effectiveness of meditation forest sites were selected for analysis of importance satisfaction. We surveyed and analyzed the students and teachers of two middle schools 'A' and 'B' in Gwangju Metropolitan City. The results of this study are as follows. First, the perception and utilization rates of the meditation forests by students was significantly lower than teachers at both schools. 'A' school has a better use and recognition rate than the 'B' school. Second, the purposes of using meditation forests were rest (49.6%), weekday lunchtime (63.6%), with friends (65.0%) or colleagues (60%), and short (less than 10 minutes) rests (68.6%). They preferred flowers (30.0%) and shading plants (28.9%), mainly using shelters (57.9%) and walking trails (37.1%). Third, as a result of the importance of satisfaction analysis, the average score of the 24 items importance (3.81), higher than the satisfaction (3.62). The 24 items positioned in 4 quadrants are as follows: Nine items are in the I quadrant for 'persistent maintenance'. Three items are in the II quadrant for 'priority correction'. Seven items are in the quadrant III for 'low priority in the management and operation'. Five items are in the quadrant IV for 'avoid over effort'. For the comparison of two middle schools' satisfaction, 'A' school satisfaction was higher than 'B' school for 16 items, which showed a statistically significant difference. It is believed that the users in 'A' school are more satisfied than 'B' school because it has more forests and trails, better accessibility, and a variety of plant types and planting areas in the A school meditation forest. The results of the overall satisfaction analysis showed a significant difference between 'A' school (68.0%) and 'B' school (47.2%) as 'A' school has better shelters and trails. The rankings of the most satisfying space are walking trails (1st place) and shelters (2nd place). The reason for the highest satisfaction was for rest (stress relief and emotional support) in both 'A' and 'B' schools.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Growing Gardens(2016) Portland school garden assessment. http://www.growing-gardens.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/School-GardenSurveyReportFinal.pdf
  2. Hue, Y. S., S. K. Lee, Y. K. Sim, I. H. Kim, K. S. Han, S. Yoon, C. G. Oh and Y. S. Jung(2014) A study on the composition principles and the classification of school forest movement: Based on the performance in 15 years and value of school forest. Environmental Education 27(2): 174-186.
  3. Jang, C. K., S. G. Jung, J. S. Jang, K. T. Kim and J. H. Oh(2009) The direction of school forest plans considering satisfaction of elementary students. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 37(4): 42-51.
  4. Jang, D. S. and K. S. Sin(2010) A study on the planting index of school forest: The case of Gyeonggido. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 37(6): 12-18.
  5. Kang, S. M., J. H. Lee and Y. O. Jeong(2011) A study on the influence of experience activity using school forest on the elementary school students' environment sensitivity and environment-friendly attitude. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education 24(2): 105-124.
  6. Kim, I. H., S. J. Choi and S. H. Lee(2000) A study on the activation strategy and state of school forest movement. The Environmental Education 2000 13(1): 111-121.
  7. Kim, J. H., S. H. Lee and Y. H. Yoon(2018) A comparative study on teacher-student perception of forest function in elementary school. Journal of Environmental Science International 27(7): 519-529. https://doi.org/10.5322/JESI.2018.27.7.519
  8. Kim, S. and D. J. Kim(2014) Effect of the school forest satisfaction on the school happiness of high school students. The Journal of Korean Institute of Forest Recreation 18(4): 49-62. https://doi.org/10.34272/forest.2014.18.4.005
  9. Korea Forest Service(2014) Meditation Forest Guideline.
  10. Korea Forest Service(2018) Meditation Forest Design Guideline.
  11. Korean Forest Research Institute(2013) The Effects of School Forests on Children and Youth. Forest Policy Issue No. 13.
  12. Kuk, J. H., Y. H. Yoon, B. J. Park and W. T. Kim(2008) Effects of school forest on satisfaction with greenspace and environmental education: Focused on elementary school teachers. J. Korean Env. Res. & Reveg. Tech. 11(4): 57-66.
  13. Lee, A. R., S. C. Kim, H. J. Lee and B. J. Park(2012) Effects of school forest on middle schools student's satisfactin with school landscaping. The Journal of Korean institute of Forest Recreation 16(3): 73-79. https://doi.org/10.34272/forest.2012.16.3.008
  14. Lee, S. G., J. S. Jang, S. G. Jung and J. H. You(2009) An analysis of satisfaction with school forest using triangular fuzzy number. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 37(3): 1-10.
  15. Lim, H. J., M. W. Lee and M. S. Jeong(2015) User assessment about ecological stream restoration of Jeonjucheon. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 24(3): 217-232. https://doi.org/10.14249/eia.2015.24.3.217
  16. Martila, J. A. and J. C. James(1977) Importance-performance analysis. Journal of Marketing 41(1): 77-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297704100112
  17. Roe, J. and P. A. Aspinall(2011) The restorative outcomes of forest school and conventional school in young people with good and poor behaviour. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 10(3): 205-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2011.03.003
  18. Song, J. H. and H. C. Lee(2018) The effects of school forest activities program on science process skill and the attitude toward science of elementary student. Journal of Korean Society of Earth Science Education 11(3): 182-192. https://doi.org/10.15523/JKSESE.2018.11.3.182
  19. Yang, G. M.(2018) A Study on the Evaluation Index of the Meditation Forest. Master's Thesis, Sangmyung University. Korea.
  20. Yun, H. J., J. S. Byeon and I. H. Kim(2008) A study on the value analysis of school forest. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 36(3): 29-38.