DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Content Analysis of Presenteeism Scales Using ICF

ICF를 이용한 프리젠티즘 도구에 대한 내용분석

  • Kim, Min (Human Resource Evaluation) ;
  • Choi, Malok (Social Welfare Department, Kyeongsung University) ;
  • Chun, Dongil (Social Welfare Department, Kangwon National University)
  • Received : 2019.05.27
  • Accepted : 2019.08.02
  • Published : 2019.08.31

Abstract

This study analyzed the contents of KOSS-SF and PWI-SF by using ICF-VR core set and IPC framework for value judgment. The two instruments are self-report questionnaires commonly used for presenteeism in order to suggest vocational rehabilitation factors to predict presenteeism. The study was conducted from Dec 2018 to Feb 2019. For the analysis, the researchers independently linked the scales using the connection rules of ICF and IPC framework. The average agreement between the researchers was 90%. KOSS-SF was linked with 60 ICF-VR codes and PWI-SF with 34 ICF-VR codes, and mainly measured activities and participation, and body function domains. According to the IPC framework, the instruments were found to measure the Rational-Social, and Emotional-Psychological aspects. As a result, the two instruments did not adequately reflect the presenteeism (30% matched) and were particularly limited in ICF-VR environmental domains. Based on the results, questions of ICF body structure, environmental, and personal domains should be added to improve the validity of the presenteeism scale, and references and guidelines should be developed for collecting clearer data. Further study and discussion were provided.

본 연구의 목적은 ICF-VR 코어셋과 가치판단 분석툴인 IPC를 이용하여 프리젠티즘 도구에 대한 내용분석을 실시하는 것이 목적이다. 이를 위해 현재 국내에서 프리젠티즘을 측정하는 자기보고식 도구인 KOSS-SF(한국인 직무스트레스 측정도구 단축형)와 PWI-SF(사회-심리적 건강측정도구 단축형)를 사용하였으며, 척도문항 분류와 문항에 포함되어 있는 코드를 분석하여 프리젠팀즘을 측정하기 위해 추가되어야 하는 직업재활 요인을 제안하였다. 2018년 12월부터 2019년 2월까지 연구가 수행되었다. 저자들은 ICF와 IPC의 연결규칙에 따라 2가지 도구들을 독립적으로 분석하였으며, 연구자 간 일치도는 90%로 나타났다. KOSS-SF는 60개, PWI-SF는 34개의 ICF-VR 코드와 연결되어 있으며, 활동과 참여, 신체기능을 측정하는 것으로 나타났다. IPC 분석틀에 따른 결과는 Rational-Social, Emotional-Psychological 영역을 측정하는 것으로 나타났다. 2가지 도구들은 ICF-VR 코어셋과 일치율이 30%이하로 나타나 직업재활 영역을 적절하게 반영하고 있지 않으며, 특히 환경영역 측정에 제한적인 것으로 나타났다. 프리젠티즘을 측정하기 위해 ICF 신체구조, 환경요인, 개인요인에 대한 문항들이 추가되어야 하며, 보다 명확한 응답수집을 위해 설문에 대한 기준점이나 가이드라인이 개발되어야 할 것이다. 이러한 연구결과를 기반으로 추후연구에 대한 제안과 논의를 제공하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Statistics in Korea, "ICF application guide for users", 2010.
  2. M. J. Kwon, E. S. Choi, "Presenteeism in clinical nurses: An integrative literature review", Korean Journal of Occupational Health Nursing, Vol.26, No.3, pp.160-171, August, 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.5807/kjohn.2017.26.3.160
  3. J. Burton, "WHO healthy workplace framework and model: Background and supporting literature and practices", Geneva: WHO Press, 2010.
  4. S. Y. Lee, "Study on the factors causing presenteeism of the workers in south Korea", Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Pusan University, 2013.
  5. P. Hump, "Presenteeism: At work-but out of it", Harvard Business Review, Vol.82, pp.49-58, 2004. Available at /presenteeism-at-work-but-out-of-it
  6. D. M. Lack, "Presenteeism Revisited: A comprehensive Review", American Association of Occupational Health Nurses Journal, Vol.59, No.2, pp.77-89, 2011. doi: http://doi.org/10.3928/08910162-20110126-01
  7. C. Koopman, K. R. Pelletier, J. F. Murray, C. E. Sharda, M. L. Berger, "Stanford presenteeism scale: Health status and employee productivity", Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Vol.44, pp.14-20, 2002. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00043764-200201000-00004
  8. S. H. Kwag, M. H. Kim, "Study on the presenteeism of the members of organization", Management Information Systems Review, Vol.33, No.2, pp.37-61, 2014. https://doi.org/10.29214/damis.2014.33.2.003
  9. G. Jourdain, M. Vezina, "How psychological stress in the workplace influences presenteeism propensity: a test of the demand control support model," European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol.23, No.4, pp.483-496, 2013. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2012.754573
  10. M. Kim, C. Cox, S. W. Lee, "Future directions to improve return-to-work in vocational rehabilitation for industrial injured workers", Korean Journal of Injury Compensation Insurance, Vol.4, No.1, pp.1-20, 2000.
  11. S. J. Jo, D. W. Kang, M. Kim, W. Kim, J. S. Lee, "A Study on the development of support for return to work for injured workers ", Ministry of Employment and Labor, 2015.
  12. MK everyday economy. Available at http://news.mk.co.kr/newsRead.php?year=2013
  13. Today Korea. Available at http://www.k-today.com/news/articleView.html?
  14. B. Y. Chun, J. C. Jung, "Presenteeism: Research trends analysis and future practical suggestions", Journal of Management & Economics, Vol.39, No.2, pp.93-134, 2017. https://doi.org/10.22828/MERI.2017.39.2.005
  15. I. S. Ryu, D. S. Jeong, I. A. Kim, J. H. Roh, J. U. Won, "Association between job stress, psychosocial well-being and presenteeism, absenteeism: Focusing on railroad workers", Korean Journal of Occupational Environmental Medicine, Vol.24, No.3, pp.263-273, 2012. doi:https://doi.org/10.35371/kjoem.2012.24.3.263
  16. W. H. Kim, J. E. Lee, E. S. Kim, J. E. Kim, S. K. Park, "Clinical application of ICF on disability evaluation and rehabilitation services", National Rehabilitation Center, 2006.
  17. E. K, Shin, "Study on the application strategies of ICF on the functioning, disability and environmental factors in Korea, Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation Research, Vol.23, No.1, pp.151-175, 2013.
  18. T. A. Stamm, A. Cieza, K. P. Machold, J. S. Smolen, G. Stucki, "Content comparison of occupation-based instruments in adult rheumatology and musculoskeletal rehabilitation based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health," Arthritis Care and Research, Vol.51, No.6, pp.917-924, 2004. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.20842
  19. S. K. Meong, K. H. Kim, J. A. Song, S. O. Bae, W. H. Kim, Y. K. Kang, "Study on the development of resources of Korea ICF", Korea University, 2017.
  20. J. E. Lee, E. J. Lee, "The influence of the burden of nurse's work and health problems on presenteeism", Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, Vol.28, No.4, pp.769-781, 2017. doi:https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2017.28.4.769
  21. E. Rosa, "Content validation of patient-rated outcome measures using the Item Perspective Classification(IPC) framework", 2012. Available at google.com/site/ipcframework/
  22. S. J. Chang, S. B. Koh, D. M. Kang, S. A. Kim, M. G. Kang, C. G. Lee, "Developing an occupational stress scale for Korean employees", Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Vol.17, No.4, pp.297-317, 2005.
  23. C. D. Kim, "Relationships of job stress, fatigue and depression among one ship-building supply workers", Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, Vol.15, No.5 pp.2789-2796, 2014. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2014.15.5.2789
  24. S. J. Jang, "Standardization of health statistics collection and measurement", Gye-Chukmunhwasa, Seoul, pp.92-143, 2000.
  25. S. S. Han, "Study on relationship between job insecurity and psychosocial distress", Unpublished Master Thesis, Yonsei University, 2003.
  26. A. Cieza, S. Geyh, S. Chatterji, N. Kostanjsek, B. Ustun, G. Stucki, "ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned", Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.37, No.4, pp.212-218, 2005. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16501970510040263
  27. C. U. Park, H. J. Kim, Measurement of Inter-Rater Reliability in Systematic Review, Hanyang Medical Reviews, Vol.35, pp.44-49, 2015. https://doi.org/10.7599/hmr.2015.35.1.44
  28. V. Arumugam, J. C. MacDermid, R. Grewal, "Content analysis of work limitation, Stanford Presenteeism, and Work Instability Questionnaires using International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health and Item Perspective Framework, Rehabilitation Research and Practice, pp.1-11, 2013. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/614825