Journal of Korean Dental Science

Korean Academy of Dental Science (대한치의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Do Certain Conditions Favor the Use of Autogenous Bone Graft Over Bone Substitutes for Maxillary Sinus Augmentation?

  • Lee, Ji-Hyun (Department of Periodontology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Cho, Yeong-Cheol (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Sung, Iel-Yong (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Jong-Ho (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Son, Jang-Ho (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2019.10.10
  • Accepted : 2019.12.26
  • Published : 2019.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate whether there are specific surgical or clinical conditions where the use of autogenous bone (AB) is superior to the use of bone substitutes (BSs) for maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 386 implants after MSFA in 178 patients. The implants were divided into five groups according to the sinus graft material used. Risk factors for implant failure in MSFA, and correlation between residual bone height (RBH) and graft materials in terms of implant survival were investigated. To investigate risk factors for implant failure in MSFA, implant survival according to graft materials, patients' sex/age, surgical site, RBH, healing period prior to prosthetic loading, staged- or simultaneous implantation with MSFA, the crown-to-implant ratio, prosthetic type, implant diameter, and opposite dentition were evaluated. Result: The cumulative 2- and 5-year survival rates of implants placed in the grafted sinus (independent of the graft material used) were 98.7% and 97.3%, respectively. None of the investigated variables were identified as significant risk factors for implant failure. There was also no statistical significance in implant survival between graft materials. Conclusion: There were no specific surgical conditions in which AB was superior to BSs in terms of implant survival after MSFA.

Keywords

References

  1. Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg. 1980; 38: 613-6.
  2. Tatum H Jr. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin North Am. 1986; 30: 207-29.
  3. Handschel J, Simonowska M, Naujoks C, Depprich RA, Ommerborn MA, Meyer U, Kubler NR. A histomorphometric meta-analysis of sinus elevation with various grafting materials. Head Face Med. 2009; 5: 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-5-12
  4. Corbella S, Taschieri S, Del Fabbro M. Long-term outcomes for the treatment of atrophic posterior maxilla: a systematic review of literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015; 17: 120-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12077
  5. Ting M, Rice JG, Braid SM, Lee CYS, Suzuki JB. Maxillary sinus augmentation for dental implant rehabilitation of the edentulous ridge: a comprehensive overview of systematic reviews. Implant Dent. 2017; 26: 438-64. https://doi.org/10.1097/id.0000000000000606
  6. Tan WC, Lang NP, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. Part II: transalveolar technique. J Clin Periodontol. 2008; 35(8 Suppl): 241-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01273.x
  7. Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. J Clin Periodontol. 2008; 35(8 Suppl): 216-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01272.x
  8. Sakkas A, Wilde F, Heufelder M, Winter K, Schramm A. Autogenous bone grafts in oral implantology-is it still a "gold standard"? A consecutive review of 279 patients with 456 clinical procedures. Int J Implant Dent. 2017; 3: 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-017-0084-4
  9. Klijn RJ, Meijer GJ, Bronkhorst EM, Jansen JA. A meta-analysis of histomorphometric results and graft healing time of various biomaterials compared to autologous bone used as sinus floor augmentation material in humans. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2010; 16: 493-507. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2010.0035
  10. Schmitt CM, Doering H, Schmidt T, Lutz R, Neukam FW, Schlegel KA. Histological results after maxillary sinus augmentation with Straumann(R) BoneCeramic, Bio-Oss(R), Puros(R), and autologous bone. A randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 24: 576-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02431.x
  11. Jang HY, Kim HC, Lee SC, Lee JY. Choice of graft material in relation to maxillary sinus width in internal sinus floor augmentation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 68: 1859-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.093
  12. Srouji S, Ben-David D, Lotan R, Riminucci M, Livne E, Bianco P. The innate osteogenic potential of the maxillary sinus (Schneiderian) membrane: an ectopic tissue transplant model simulating sinus lifting. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 39: 793-801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2010.03.009
  13. Al-Nawas B, Schiegnitz E. Augmentation procedures using bone substitute materials or autogenous bone - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014; 7(Suppl 2): S219-34.
  14. Kolerman R, Nissan J, Rahmanov M, Vered H, Cohen O, Tal H. Comparison between mineralized cancellous bone allograft and an alloplast material for sinus augmentation: a split mouth histomorphometric study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017; 19: 812-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12518
  15. Wang F, Zhou W, Monje A, Huang W, Wang Y, Wu Y. Influence of healing period upon bone turn over on maxillary sinus floor augmentation grafted solely with deproteinized bovine bone mineral: a prospective human histological and clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017; 19: 341-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12463
  16. Pabst AM, Walter C, Ehbauer S, Zwiener I, Ziebart T, Al-Nawas B, Klein MO. Analysis of implant-failure predictors in the posterior maxilla: a retrospective study of 1395 implants. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015; 43: 414-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2015.01.004
  17. Zinser MJ, Randelzhofer P, Kuiper L, Zoller JE, De Lange GL. The predictors of implant failure after maxillary sinus floor augmentation and reconstruction: a retrospective study of 1045 consecutive implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013; 115: 571-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2012.06.015
  18. Rosen PS, Summers R, Mellado JR, Salkin LM, Shanaman RH, Marks MH, Fugazzotto PA. The bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation technique: multicenter retrospective report of consecutively treated patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999; 14: 853-8.
  19. Aghaloo TL, Moy PK. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007; 22(Suppl): 49-70.
  20. Yoon WJ, Jeong KI, You JS, Oh JS, Kim SG. Survival rate of Astra Tech implants with maxillary sinus lift. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 40: 17-20. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2014.40.1.17
  21. Ferreira CE, Novaes A Jr, Martinelli CB, Almeida AL, Batitucci RG. Grafting the nasal cavity with 100% anorganic bovine bone: a clinical and histomorphometric pilot report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013; 28: 670-6. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3008
  22. Mordenfeld A, Lindgren C, Hallman M. Sinus floor augmentation using Straumann(R) $BoneCeramic^{TM}$ and Bio-Oss(R) in a split mouth design and later placement of implants: a 5-year report from a longitudinal study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016; 18: 926-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12374
  23. de Vicente JC, Hernandez-Vallejo G, Brana-Abascal P, Pena I. Maxillary sinus augmentation with autologous bone harvested from the lateral maxillary wall combined with bovine-derived hydroxyapatite: clinical and histologic observations. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010; 21: 430-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01877.x
  24. Jensen T, Schou S, Gundersen HJ, Forman JL, Terheyden H, Holmstrup P. Bone-to-implant contact after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss and autogenous bone in different ratios in mini pigs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 24: 635-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02438.x
  25. Danesh-Sani SA, Engebretson SP, Janal MN. Histomorphometric results of different grafting materials and effect of healing time on bone maturation after sinus floor augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontal Res. 2017; 52: 301-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/jre.12402
  26. Felice P, Pistilli R, Piattelli M, Soardi E, Barausse C, Esposito M. 1-stage versus 2-stage lateral sinus lift procedures: 1-year post-loading results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014; 7: 65-75.
  27. Blanes RJ, Bernard JP, Blanes ZM, Belser UC. A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. II: Influence of the crownto-implant ratio and different prosthetic treatment modalities on crestal bone loss. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 18: 707-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01307.x
  28. Villarinho EA, Triches DF, Alonso FR, Mezzomo LAM, Teixeira ER, Shinkai RSA. Risk factors for single crowns supported by short (6-mm) implants in the posterior region: a prospective clinical and radiographic study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017; 19: 671-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12494
  29. Huynh-Ba G, Friedberg JR, Vogiatzi D, Ioannidou E. Implant failure predictors in the posterior maxilla: a retrospective study of 273 consecutive implants. J Periodontol. 2008; 79: 2256-61. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.070602
  30. Karabuda C, Arisan V, Ozyuvaci H. Effects of sinus membrane perforations on the success of dental implants placed in the augmented sinus. J Periodontol. 2006; 77: 1991-7. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.060102
  31. de Almeida Ferreira CE, Martinelli CB, Novaes AB Jr, Pignaton TB, Guignone CC, Goncalves de Almeida AL, Saba-Chujfi E. Effect of maxillary sinus membrane perforation on implant survival rate: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017; 32: 401-7. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.4419