한국의학물리학회지:의학물리 (Progress in Medical Physics)

  • 제30권3호
  • /
  • Pages.65-73
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2508-4445(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2508-4453(eISSN)
한국의학물리학회 (Korean Society of Medical Physics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Dosimetric Effects of Intrafractional Organ Motion in Field-in-Field Technique for Whole-Breast Irradiation

  • Hong, Chae-Seon (Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Ju, Sang Gyu (Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Doo Ho (Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Han, Youngyih (Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Huh, Seung Jae (Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Won (Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Ahn, Yong Chan (Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Jin Sung (Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lim, Do Hoon (Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2019.09.23
  • 심사 : 2019.09.27
  • 발행 : 2019.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: We evaluated the motion-induced dosimetric effects on the field-in-field (FIF) technique for whole-breast irradiation (WBI) using actual patient organ motion data obtained from cine electronic portal imaging device (cine EPID) images during treatment. Materials and Methods: Ten breast cancer patients who received WBI after breast-conserving surgery were selected. The static FIF (SFIF) plan involved the application of two parallel opposing tangential and boost FIFs. To obtain the amplitude of the internal organ motion during treatment, cine EPID images were acquired five times for each patient. The outside contour of the breast (OCB) and chest wall (CW) contour were tracked using in-house motion analysis software. Intrafractional organ motion was analyzed. The dynamic FIF (DFIF) reflecting intrafractional organ motion incorporated into the SFIF plan was calculated and compared with the SFIF in terms of the dose homogeneity index (DHI90/10) for the target and V20 for the ipsilateral lung. Results: The average motion amplitudes along the X and Y directions were 1.84±1.09 mm and 0.69±0.50 mm for OCB and 1.88±1.07 mm and 1.66±1.49 mm for CW, respectively. The maximum motion amplitudes along the X and Y directions were 5.53 and 2.08 mm for OCB and 5.22 and 6.79 mm for CW, respectively. Significant differences in DHI90/10 values were observed between SFIF and DFIF (0.94 vs 0.95, P<0.05) in statistical analysis. The average V20 for the lung in the DFIF was slightly higher than that of the SFIF in statistical analysis (19.21 vs 19.00, P<0.05). Conclusion: Our findings indicate that the FIF technique can form a safe and effective treatment method for WBI. Regular monitoring using cine EPID images can be effective in reducing motion-induced dosimetric errors.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and World Health Organization (WHO). GLOBOCAN 2012: Estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide 2012;Available at: http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_cancer.aspx.
  2. Blichert-Toft M, Rose C, Andersen JA, Overgaard M, Axelsson CK, Andersen KW, et al. Danish randomized trial comparing breast conservation therapy with mastectomy: six years of life-table analysis. Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1992:19-25.
  3. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1233-1241. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa022152
  4. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, Greco M, Saccozzi R, Luini A, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1227-1232. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa020989
  5. Fisher B, Anderson S, Redmond CK, Wolmark N, Wickerham DL, Cronin WM. Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1456-1461. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199511303332203
  6. Taylor ME, Perez CA, Halverson KJ, Kuske RR, Philpott GW, Garcia DM, et al. Factors influencing cosmetic results after conservation therapy for breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995;31:753-764. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(94)00480-3
  7. Park W, Huh SJ, Yang JH, Nam SJ, Kim JH, Choi JY, et al. The implication of hot spots on bone scans within the irradiated field of breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy followed by radiotherapy. Ann Nucl Med 2008;22:685-691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-008-0158-8
  8. Oliver M, Chen J, Wong E, Van Dyk J, Perera F. A treatment planning study comparing whole breast radiation therapy against conformal, IMRT and tomotherapy for accelerated partial breast irradiation. Radiother Oncol 2007;82:317-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2006.11.021
  9. Prabhakar R, Haresh KP, Julka PK, Ganesh T, Rath GK, Joshi RC, et al. A study on contralateral breast surface dose for various tangential field techniques and the impact of set-up error on this dose. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 2007;30:42-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03178408
  10. Harsolia A, Kestin L, Grills I, Wallace M, Jolly S, Jones C, et al. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy results in significant decrease in clinical toxicities compared with conventional wedge-based breast radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007;68:1375-1380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.02.044
  11. Kestin LL, Sharpe MB, Frazier RC, Vicini FA, Yan D, Matter RC, et al. Intensity modulation to improve dose uniformity with tangential breast radiotherapy: initial clinical experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000;48:1559-1568. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(00)01396-1
  12. Haciislamoglu E, Colak F, Canyilmaz E, Dirican B, Gurdalli S, Yilmaz AH, et al. Dosimetric comparison of left-sided whole-breast irradiation with 3DCRT, forward-planned IMRT, inverse-planned IMRT, helical tomotherapy, and volumetric arc therapy. Radiother Oncol 2011;100:241-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2011.01.004
  13. Mihai A, Rakovitch E, Sixel K, Woo T, Cardoso M, Bell C, et al. Inverse vs. forward breast IMRT planning. Med Dosim 2005;30:149-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2005.03.004
  14. Onal C, Sonmez A, Arslan G, Oymak E, Kotek A, Efe E, et al. Dosimetric comparison of the field-in-field technique and tangential wedged beams for breast irradiation. Jpn J Radiol 2012;30:218-226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-011-0034-7
  15. Prabhakar R, Julka PK, Rath GK. Can field-in-field technique replace wedge filter in radiotherapy treatment planning: a comparative analysis in various treatment sites. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 2008;31:317-324. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03178601
  16. Michalski A, Atyeo J, Cox J, Rinks M. Inter- and intra-fraction motion during radiation therapy to the whole breast in the supine position: a systematic review. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2012;56:499-509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9485.2012.02434.x
  17. Jain P, Marchant T, Green M, Watkins G, Davies J, McCarthy C, et al. Inter-fraction motion and dosimetric consequences during breast intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Radiother Oncol 2009;90:93-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2008.10.010
  18. Song T, Suh CO, Lee I, Jeong K, Keum K, Lee CG, et al. The effect of respiratory motion on forward intensity modulated radiotherapy for breast cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2008;7:207-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/153303460800700306
  19. Mitchell J, Formenti SC, DeWyngaert JK. Interfraction and intrafraction setup variability for prone breast radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;76:1571-1577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1683
  20. Kahan Z, Csenki M, Varga Z, Szil E, Cserhati A, Balogh A, et al. The risk of early and late lung sequelae after conformal radiotherapy in breast cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007;68:673-681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.016
  21. Saliou MG, Giraud P, Simon L, Fournier-Bidoz N, Fourquet A, Dendale R, et al. Radiotherapy for breast cancer: respiratory and set-up uncertainties. Cancer Radiother 2005;9:414-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canrad.2005.09.003
  22. Smith RP, Bloch P, Harris EE, McDonough J, Sarkar A, Kassaee A, et al. Analysis of interfraction and intrafraction variation during tangential breast irradiation with an electronic portal imaging device. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005;62:373-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.10.022
  23. Baroni G, Ferrigno G, Orecchia R, Pedotti A. Real-time opto-electronic verification of patient position in breast cancer radiotherapy. Comput Aided Surg 2000;5:296-306. https://doi.org/10.3109/10929080009148897
  24. Richter A, Sweeney R, Baier K, Flentje M, Guckenberger M. Effect of breathing motion in radiotherapy of breast cancer: 4D dose calculation and motion tracking via EPID. Strahlenther Onkol 2009;185:425-430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-009-1980-1
  25. Berbeco RI, Pope CJ, Jiang SB. Measurement of the interplay effect in lung IMRT treatment using EDR2 films. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2006;7:33-42. https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v7i4.2222
  26. Court LE, Seco J, Lu XQ, Ebe K, Mayo C, Ionascu D, et al. Use of a realistic breathing lung phantom to evaluate dose delivery errors. Med Phys 2010;37:5850-5857. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3496356
  27. Chui CS, Yorke E, Hong L. The effects of intra-fraction organ motion on the delivery of intensity-modulated field with a multileaf collimator. Med Phys 2003;30:1736-1746. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1578771
  28. Cao J, Roeske JC, Chmura SJ, Salama JK, Shoushtari AN, Boyer AL, et al. Calculation and prediction of the effect of respiratory motion on whole breast radiation therapy dose distributions. Med Dosim 2009;34:126-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2008.07.002