Acknowledgement
This study was supported by a grant from the National R&D Program for Cancer Control, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (1520200).
References
- Jung KW, Won YJ, Oh CM, Kong HJ, Lee DH, Lee KH; Community of Population-Based Regional Cancer Registries. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2014. Cancer Res Treat 2017;49:292-305 https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.118
- Suh M, Choi KS, Park B, Lee YY, Jun JK, Lee DH, et al. Trends in cancer screening rates among Korean men and women: results of the Korean national cancer screening survey, 2004-2013. Cancer Res Treat 2016;48:1-10 https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.204
- Lee EH, Kim KW, Kim YJ, Shin DR, Park YM, Lim HS, et al. Performance of screening mammography: a report of the Alliance for Breast Cancer Screening in Korea. Korean J Radiol 2016;17:489-496 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2016.17.4.489
- Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, Yaffe M, Baum JK, Acharyya S, et al.; Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST) Investigators Group. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1773-1783 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa052911
- Pisano ED, Hendrick RE, Yaffe MJ, Baum JK, Acharyya S, Cormack JB, et al.; DMIST Investigators Group. Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST. Radiology 2008;246:376-383 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2461070200
- Kerlikowske K, Hubbard RA, Miglioretti DL, Geller BM, Yankaskas BC, Lehman CD, et al.; Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Comparative effectiveness of digital versus filmscreen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2011;155:493-502 https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00005
- Timmers JM, den Heeten GJ, Adang EM, Otten JD, Verbeek AL, Broeders MJ. Dutch digital breast cancer screening: implications for breast cancer care. Eur J Public Health 2012;22:925-929 https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckr170
- Nederend J, Duijm LE, Louwman MW, Groenewoud JH, Donkers-van Rossum AB, Voogd AC. Impact of transition from analog screening mammography to digital screening mammography on screening outcome in the Netherlands: a population-based study. Ann Oncol 2012;23:3098-3103 https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mds146
- Vigeland E, Klaasen H, Klingen TA, Hofvind S, Skaane P. Full-field digital mammography compared to screen film mammography in the prevalent round of a population-based screening programme: the Vestfold county study. Eur Radiol 2008;18:183-191 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0730-y
- van Luijt PA, Fracheboud J, Heijnsdijk EA, den Heeten GJ, de Koning HJ; National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening in Netherlands Study Group (NETB). Nation-wide data on screening performance during the transition to digital mammography: observations in 6 million screens. Eur J Cancer 2013;49:3517-3525 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2013.06.020
- Bae JM, Shin SY, Kim EH, Kim YN, Nam CM. Distribution of dense breasts using screening mammography in Korean women: a retrospective observational study. Epidemiol Health 2014;36:e2014027 https://doi.org/10.4178/epih/e2014027
- Stomper PC, D'Souza DJ, DiNitto PA, Arredondo MA. Analysis of parenchymal density on mammograms in 1353 women 25-79 years old. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:1261-1265 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.167.5.8911192
- Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, White D, Finder CA, Taplin SH, et al. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:1081-1087 https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/92.13.1081
- Sickles EA, D'Orsi CJ. ACR BI-RADS follow-up and outcome monitoring. In: D'Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, Morris EA, eds. ACR BI-RADS® atlas, 5th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2013:15-20
- DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44:837-845 https://doi.org/10.2307/2531595
- Skaane P, Hofvind S, Skjennald A. Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study. Radiology 2007;244:708-717 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2443061478
- Kim YJ, Lee EH, Jun JK, Shin DR, Park YM, Kim HW, et al.; Alliance for Breast Cancer Screening in Korea (ABCS-K). Analysis of participant factors that affect the diagnostic performance of screening mammography: a report of the Alliance for Breast Cancer Screening in Korea. Korean J Radiol 2017;18:624-631 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2017.18.4.624
- Dabbous F, Dolecek TA, Friedewald SM, Tossas-Milligan KY, Macarol T, Summerfelt WT, et al. Performance characteristics of digital vs film screen mammography in community practice. Breast J 2018;24:369-372 https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.12942
- Karssemeijer N, Bluekens AM, Beijerinck D, Deurenberg JJ, Beekman M, Visser R, et al. Breast cancer screening results 5 years after introduction of digital mammography in a population-based screening program. Radiology 2009;253:353-358 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2532090225
- Del Turco MR, Mantellini P, Ciatto S, Bonardi R, Martinelli F, Lazzari B, et al. Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:860-866 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.2303
- Heddson B, Ronnow K, Olsson M, Miller D. Digital versus screen-film mammography: a retrospective comparison in a population-based screening program. Eur J Radiol 2007;64:419-425 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.02.030
- Dershaw DD, Abramson A, Kinne DW. Ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic findings and clinical implications. Radiology 1989;170:411-415 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.170.2.2536185
- Duffy SW, Dibden A, Michalopoulos D, Offman J, Parmar D, Jenkins J, et al. Screen detection of ductal carcinoma in situ and subsequent incidence of invasive interval breast cancers: a retrospective population-based study. Lancet Oncol 2016;17:109-114 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00446-5
- Duffy SW, Tabar L, Vitak B, Day NE, Smith RA, Chen HH, et al. The relative contributions of screen-detected in situ and invasive breast carcinomas in reducing mortality from the disease. Eur J Cancer 2003;39:1755-1760 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(03)00259-4
- Kalager M, Zelen M, Langmark F, Adami HO. Effect of screening mammography on breast-cancer mortality in Norway. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1203-1210 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1000727
- Welch HG, Prorok PC, O'Malley AJ, Kramer BS. Breast-cancer tumor size, overdiagnosis, and mammography screening effectiveness. N Engl J Med 2016;375:1438-1447 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1600249
Cited by
- Advanced and futuristic approaches for breast cancer diagnosis vol.6, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1186/s43094-020-00113-2
- Digital Mammography as a Screening Tool in Korea vol.82, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2021.0004