Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education (한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육)

The Korean Elementary Science Education Society (한국초등과학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Teacher Participation-Oriented Education Program Centered on Multi-Faceted Analysis of Elementary Science Classes on the Class Expertise of Novice Teacher

초등 과학수업의 다면적 분석을 중심으로 한 교사 참여형 교육프로그램이 초보교사의 수업전문성에 미치는 효과

  • Received : 2019.08.03
  • Accepted : 2019.08.27
  • Published : 2019.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze The Effect of Teacher Participation-oriented Education Program (TPEP) centered on Multi-Faceted Analysis of Elementary Science Classes on the Class Expertise of novice teacher. First, in order to develop the TPEP, lectures and exploratory science classes were analyzed using imaging and eye-tracking techniques. In this study, the TPEP was developed in five stages: image analysis, eye analysis, teaching language analysis, gesture analysis, and class development. Participants directly analyzed the classes of experienced and novice teachers at each stage. The TPEP developed in this study is different from the existing teacher education program in that it reflected the human performance technology aspects. The participants analyzed actual elementary science classes in a multi-faceted way and developed better classes based on them. The results of this study are as follows. First, at the teacher training institutions and the school sites, pre-service teachers and novice teachers should be provided with various experiences in class analysis and multi-faceted analysis of their own classes. Second, through this study, we were able to identify the limitations of existing class observations and video analysis. Third, the TPEP should be developed to improve the novice teachers' class expertise. Finally, we hope that the results of this study are used as basic data in developing programs to improve teachers' class expertise in teacher training institutions and education policy institutions.

Keywords

References

  1. Allen, D. D., Cobb, J. B. & Danger, S. (2003). Inservice teacher mentoring aspring teachers. Mentoring and Tutoring, 11(2), 177-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611260306854
  2. Baek, S., Ham, E., Lee, J., Shin, H. & Yu, Y. (2007). Theoretical consideration on the factors of teaching competency of secondary school teachers. Asian Journal of Education, 8(1), 47-69. https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2007.8.1.003
  3. Baek, Y. (2010). An analysis on the effectiveness of the instructional consulting - Focusing on the supervisionmentoring program of Daegu -. (Master's degree). Daegu National University of Education.
  4. Baik, I. & Kim H. (2011). Exploring professional development of science teachers through the research experience for teachers program. Journal of Korea Association Science Education, 31(5), 663-679. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2011.31.5.663
  5. Berliner, D. C. (2001). Learning about and learning from expert teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 463-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(02)00004-6
  6. Burden, P. R. (1982). Implications of teacher career development: New roles for teachers, administrators, and professors. Action in Teacher Education. Action in Teacher Education, 4(4), 21-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.1982.10519117
  7. Byeon, J., Lee, I. & Kwon, Y. (2011). A study on consulting of teaching behavior patterns of gaze fixation by using eye tracker: The case study. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 11(4), 173-199.
  8. Cho, Y. & Park, S. (2013). Explore measures of teaching behavior of university instructors for effective teaching and learning. Andragogy Today, 16, 105-127.
  9. Christensen, JC. & Fessler, R. (1992). Teacher development as a career-long process. The teacher career cycle: Understanding and guiding the professional development of teachers. pp. 1-20.
  10. Daniel, R. B. (2000). Evaluating teachers for professional growth. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. p. 32, 54.
  11. Eom, G. & Lim, C. (1998). Extension of inquiry thinking ability through the application of questioning model. Daegu National University of Education, 3(2), 5-44.
  12. Fuller, F. F. (1969). Concerns of teacher: A development conceptualization. American Education Research Journal, 6(2), 207-226. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312006002207
  13. Fuller, F. F. & Brown, O. H. (1975). Becoming a teacher. In Kevin, R.(Ed), Teacher education (74yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, part(II). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  14. Han, J. & Yoon, J. (2012). An analysis of stakeholderbased assessment perspectives for evaluating teaching skills of science teachers in teacher development. Curriculum Education Research, 16, 941-960.
  15. Hwang, M. & Lee, K. (2004). A study on the experience and preference of elementary school students about teachers’ nonverbal behaviors. Educational Development Research, 20(2), 103-136.
  16. Jeong, H. & Kim, J. (2005). A study on the difficulty of teaching and learning science and elementary school teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 24(5), 531-538.
  17. Jung, J. & Lee, B. (2016). Analysis on the mismatch between instructional design and teaching practice of pre-service science teachers in teaching practicum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(3), 435-443. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.3.0435
  18. Kang, S. (2012). A study on the perception of ‘good lessons’ of preservice teachers based on mock class activities. Teaching Methodology, 24, 209-228.
  19. Kang, S., Han, S., Jeong, Y. & Noh, T. (2001). Comparison of verbal interaction patterns in small - Group discussion by learning strategies. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 21(2), 279-288.
  20. Kim, S., Jeong, M. & Hwang, Y. (2005). Development and application of self-assessment tools to improve the professionalism of secondary science teachers. Korean Journal of Science Education, 25(7), 736-745.
  21. Kim, Y. (2000). Meaning and praise of Korean hand gestures. Korean Meaning, 6, 27-47.
  22. Kim, J., Shin, W. & Shin, D. (2018). Analysis of teaching behavior and visual attention according to teacher’s career in elementary science inquire-based class on respiration. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 37(2), 206-218. https://doi.org/10.15267/KESES.2018.37.2.206
  23. Kim, S., Byeon, J., Lee, I. & Kwon, Y. (2012). An eye tracking study on test-item solving of science scholastic achievement focused in elementary school students. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 12(1), 65-78.
  24. Kim, Y., Kim, H. & Shin, A. (2011). The effect of class scholarship emphasizing reflective thinking on elementary school teachers’ science class. Journal of the Korean Association Science Education, 31(8), 1092-1109. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2011.31.8.1092
  25. Ko, M. & Kwon, C. (2011). The degree of concern and difficult of elementary school teachers about science lessen. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Education Society, 4(3), 218-230.
  26. KOFSES, (2016). 2016 Science Education Conference. The Korean Federation of Science Education Societies, 173-185.
  27. Kwak, B. (2001). Reform of classroom education and teaching professionalism of teachers. Korean Teacher Education Research, 18, 5-13.
  28. Kwak, Y. (2009). Analysis of professional development in teaching practices of beginning secondary science teachers. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 30(3), 354-365. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2009.30.3.354
  29. Kwon, Y. (2006). An analysis of the effective factors of teaching behaviors in the teaching classes of universities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yonsei University Graduate School.
  30. Kwon, Y. (2006). An analysis of factors of effective lecturing behaviors in university class. (Doctoral thesis). Yonsei University.
  31. Lee, D. & Lee, Y. (2009). Exploration of teacher assessment criteria considering teacher development stages. Korean Society for Teacher Education Conference, 1-17.
  32. Lee, H., Oh, E., Song, H., Jeon, H., Kang, D., Kwon, J., ... & Yang, Y. (2006). Development of supporting programs for teaching consultation and pedagogical content knowledge by subjects. Korean Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
  33. Lim, J. & Kim Y. (2000). Communication correlation between body language and routine language expression. Linguistic Science Research, 17, 59-78.
  34. McMillan, J. H., Myran, S. & Workman, D. (2002). Elementary teachers’ classroom assessment and grading practices. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(4), 203-213. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670209596593
  35. Nam, J., Lee, S., Lim, J. & Moon, S. (2010). An analysis of change in beginner science teacher’s classroom interaction through mentoring program. Journal of Korea Association Science Education, 30(8), 953-970. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2010.30.8.953
  36. Palmer, D. J., Stough, L. M., Burdenski, Jr, T. K. & Gonzales, M. (2005). Identifying teacher expertise: An examination of researchers’ decision making. Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4001_2
  37. Schneider, R. (2008). Mentoring new mentors: Learning to mentor preservice science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(2), 113-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-007-9088-x
  38. Seong, S. & Choi, B. (2007). Case study on verbal interactions of teacher-small group students in science experiments. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 51(4), 375-386. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2007.51.4.375
  39. Shin, J. (2013). Differences in assessments of instructional behavior perceived by teachers and students. Educational Research Papers, 34(2), 209-229.
  40. Shin, W. & Shin, D. (2013). Analysis of eye movement by the science achievement level of the elementary students on observation test. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 32(2), 185-197. https://doi.org/10.15267/KESES.2013.32.2.185
  41. Shin, W. & Shin, D. (2014). The development of intervention program for enhancing elementary science-poor students’ basic science process skills - Focus on eye movement analysis -. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 34(8), 795-806. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.8.0795
  42. Shin, W. & Shin, D. (2016). An analysis of elementary students’ attention characteristics through attention test and the eye tracking on real science classes. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 36(4), 705-715. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.4.0705
  43. Shin, W. (2016). The development of science knowledge generative learning WEDO model through cognitiveneuroscientific analysis on elementary science class. Graduate School of Education SNUE, Doctorate thesis.
  44. Shin, W. S., Kim, J. H. & Shin, D. H. (2017). Elementary teacher’s science class analysis using mobile eye tracker. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 36(4), 303-315. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2017.36.4.303
  45. Shin, W. & Shin, D. (2018). Analysis of visual attention according to the career of the teachers in elementary science lecture-centered class - Focused on the 5th grade unit of the function and structure of our body -. Biology Education, 46(1), 154-164. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2018.46.1.154
  46. Son, S. (2005). Development of teacher education from the perspective of teacher’s instructional expertise. Korean Teacher Education Research, 22, 89-108.
  47. Turner, T. & DiMarco, W. (1998). Learning to teach science in the secondary schools: A companion to school experience. Routledge.
  48. Won, H. (1998). Analysis of performance-oriented teacher evaluation areas and factors. Educational Evaluation Research, 11, 103-126.
  49. Yang, I., Suh, H., Jung, J., Kwon, Y., Jung, J., Seo, J. & Lee, H. (2004). Analysis of teaching behavior elements and class types in elementary science teachers’ classes. Journal of the Korean Association Science Education, 24(3), 565-582.