References
- Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
- Basaraba, D., Zannou, Y., Woods, D. & Ketterlin-Geller, L. (2013). Exploring the utility of student-think alouds for providing insights into students' metacognitive and problem-solving processes during assessment development. Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1-11.
- Choi, H. D., Shin, W. S. & Shin, D. H. (2012). Differences in eye movement patterns in the classification process of elementary science gifted and normal children. Elementary Science Education, 31(4), 501-512.
- Corbetta, M., Miezin, F. M., Shulman, G. L. & Petersen, S. E. (1993). Attention modulation of neural processing of shape, color, and velocity in humans. Science, 248, 1556-1559. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2360050
- Corbetta, M., Shulman, G. L., Miezin, F. M. & Petersen, S. E. (1995). Superior cortex activation during spatial attention shifts and visual feature conjunction. Science, 270, 802-805. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.270.5237.802
- Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In Sternberg, R. J. & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 365-395). Cambridge, MA, US: The MIT Press.
- Holyoak, K. J. & Thagard, P. (1995). Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. US: MIT Press.
- Isaksen, S. G. (1994). Versions of CPS. Buffalo. NY: Cencer for Studies in Creativity, Buffalo State Colleage.
- Jung, J. J. (2015). Principles and practices of brain-based learning. Seoul: Governor.
- Kwon, M. J. & Cho, S. H. (2014). An analysis of the relationship between the scientifically gifted brain utilization and scientific creative problem solving ability. Gifted Education Research, 24(6), 961-974.
- Kim, J. S. & Jang, S. H. (2017). Analysis of visualization activities in the process of creative science problem solving for elementary school students. Elementary Science Education, 36(1), 73-84. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2017.36.1.073
- Kim, Y. J., Kim, J. Y. & Kwon, C. S. (2005). Differences in EEG activity between elementary science gifted students and normal children. Biology Education, 33(1), 23-32.
- Lee, G. N. & Shin, J. H. (2019). The effect of barefoot experience program on EEG and brain utilization of elementary school students. Learner Centered Curriculum Education Research, 19, 219-238.
- Lee, S. J., Bae, J. H. & Kim, E. J. (2007). Types and characteristics of thinking in scientific creative problem solving of elementary science gifted children and ordinary children. Elementary Science Education, 25(5), 567-581.
- Lim, C. S. (2012). Development of a creative scientific problem solving instruction model based on a brainbased evolutionary approach. Biology Education, 40(4), 429-452. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2012.40.4.429
- Lim, C. S. (2014). Develop and apply scientific creativity assessment formulas. Elementary Science Education, 33(2), 242-257. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2014.33.2.242
- Mednick, S. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220-232. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048850
- Ministry of Education (2015). Revised primary school science curriculum. Ministry of Education Notice 2015-74.
- Muller, H. J. & Krummenacher, J. (2006). Visual search and selective attention. Visual Cognition, 14(4-8), 389-410. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280500527676
- Mumford, M. D., Marks, M. A., Connelly, M. S., Zaccaro, S. J. & Johnson, J. F. (1998). Domain-based scoring in divergent-thinking tests: Validation evidence in an occupational sample. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 151-163. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1102_5
- Navalpakkam, V. & Itti, L. (2002) A goal oriented attention guidance model. Biologically Motivated Computer Vision Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 25, 453-461. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36181-2_45
- Shim, H. J. & Jang, S. H. (2007). A case study of the creative science problem solving process of science gifted children and ordinary children. Elementary Science Education, 25(5), 532-547.
- Shin, D. H. & Kwon, Y. J. (2007). A review of brain research methods in elementary science educationfocusing on fMRI utilization. Elementary Science Education, 26(1), 49-62.
- Shin, W. S. (2016). A study of eye tracking method in elementary science education research. Elementary Science Education, 35(3), 288-304. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2016.35.3.288
- Shin, W. S. & Shin, D. H. (2013a). Analysis of eye movement according to science achievement of elementary school students in observation problems. Elementary Science Education, 32(2), 185-197.
- Shin, W. S. & Shin, D. H. (2013b). Development of heuristic attention model by analyzing eye movements of elementary school students in discrimination task. Korean Journal of Science Education, 33(7), 1471-1485.
- Shin, W. S. & Shin, D. H. (2016). Analysis of attention characteristics of elementary school students through eye tracking and attention test in science class. Korean Journal of Science Education, 36(4), 705-715.
- Slykhuis, D. A., Wiebe, E. N. & Annetta, L. A. (2005). Eye-tracking students’ attention to powerpoint photographs in science education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(6), 509-520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-005-0225-z
- Snowden, R., Thompson, P. & Troscianko, T. (2011). Basic vision: An introduction to visual perception. translated by Oh, S. J. Seoul: Hakjisa.
- Torrance, E. P. (1998). The torrance tests of creative thinking norms - Technical manual figural (streamlined) forms A & B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service, Inc.
- You, T. S. & Jeon, Y. S. (2017). A case study on the creative problem solving process of the elementary school students. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 28, 53-69. https://doi.org/10.20972/kjee.28..201705.53