References
- 강충열, 김동영(2001). 인성 및 창의성 신장 방안. 한국교원대학교부설 교과교육공동연구소. 교육정책 및교육 개혁 추진 과제. 연구보고 RR, 99-1.
- 김영채(2012). 창의력의 영역 보편성과 특수성. 사고개발, 8(1), 1-29.
- 김혁곤(1992). 대학생의 사회적 불안 감소를 위한 집단 상담 프로그램의 효과. 전남대학교 박사학위논문.
- 박은숙(2016). PBL 수업에서의 모바일 프레젠테이션 저작도구의 활용이 학습자의 발표력에 미치는 영향. 인문사회 21, 7(5), 605-624.
- 신문승(2010). 초등학생용 창의적 성향 검사의 개발 및 타당화. 초등교육연구, 23(3), 267-291.
- 임채성(2012). 뇌기반 진화적 접근법에 따른 창의적 과학 문제해결 지도 모형 개발. 생물교육, 40(4), 429-452.
- 임채성(2014). 과학창의성 평가 공식의 개발과 적용. 초등과학교육, 33(2), 242-257.
- 임채성, 하경태, 오진태(2008). 생명 현상에 대한 정보 제공 유형에 따른 초등학교 학생의 협동적 의미 구성. 생물교육, 36(4), 512-522.
- 최인수(2000). 유아용 창의성 측정도구에 관한 고찰. 유아교육연구, 20(2), 139-166.
- 하주현(2000). 창의적 인성 검사 개발. 교육심리연구, 14(2), 187-210.
- 함경애(2014). 초등학생의 완벽주의와 발표불안과의 관계에서 부정적인 자동 사고의 매개효과. 인문학논총, 36, 407-429.
- Baer, J. (2012). Domain specificity and the limits of creativity theory. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.002
- Basadur, M. I. N., Taggar, S. & Pringle, P. A. M. (1999). Improving the measurement of divergent thinking attitudes in organizations. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 33(2), 75-111. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1999.tb01040.x
- Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity Research Journal, 18(4), 447-457. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1804_4
- Daly, J. A., Vangelisti, A. L., Neel, H. L. & Cavanaugh, P. D. (1989). Pre performance concerns associated with public speaking anxiety. Communication Quarterly, 37(1), 39-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463378909385524
- Davis, G. A. & Rimm, S. (1982). Group inventory for finding interests:(GIFFI) I and II: Instruments for identifying creative potential in the junior and senior high school. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 16(1), 50-57. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1982.tb00321.x
- Davis, M. A. (2009). Understanding the relationship between mood and creativity: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.04.001
- Dietrich, A. (2004). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(6), 1011-1026. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196731
- Dietrich, A. (2007). Who’s afraid of a cognitive neuroscience of creativity?. Methods, 42(1), 22-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.12.009
- Dietrich, A. & Haider, H. (2017). A neurocognitive framework for human creative thought. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 2078.
- Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290-309. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5
- Fischer, G., Giaccardi, E., Eden, H., Sugimoto, M. & Ye, Y. (2005). Beyond binary choices: Integrating individual and social creativity. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 63(4-5), 482-512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.014
- Han, K. S. & Marvin, C. (2002). Multiple creativities? Investigating domain-specificity of creativity in young children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46(2), 98-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620204600203
- Hu, W. & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 389-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110098912
- Kind, P. & Kind, V. (2007). Creativity in science education: Perspectives and challenges for developing school science. Studies in Science Education, 43, 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260708560225
- Nishimura, S., Nevgi, A. & Tella, S. (2008). Communication style and cultural features in high/low context communication cultures: A case study of Finland, Japan and India. Teoksessa A. Kallioniemi (toim.), Uudistuva ja kehittyva ainedidaktiikka. Ainedidaktinen Symposiumi, 8(2008), 783-796.
- Rimm, S. (1983). Part II - Self-report inventories and the characteristics approach: Identifying creativity. G/C/T, 6(4), 19-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/107621758300600409
- Rosenfeld, L. B., Grant III, C. H. & McCroskey, J. C. (1995). Communication apprehension and self-perceived communication competence of academically gifted students. Communication Education, 44(1), 79-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529509378999
- Runco, M. A. (2006). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. San Diego: Academic Press.
- Runco, M. A. & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
- Torrance, E. P. (1962). Non-test ways of identifying the creatively gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 6(3), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698626200600301
- Torrance, E. P., Ball, O. E. & Safter, H. T. (1992). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Streamlined scoring guide (Figural A & B). Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service, Inc.
- Treffinger, D. J., Young, G. C., Selby, E. C. & Shepardson, C. A. (2002). Assessing creativity. Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
- Wang, C. W. & Horng, R. Y. (2002). The effects of creative problem solving training on creativity, cognitive type and R&D performance. R&D Management, 32(1), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00237
- Young, D. J. (1990). An investigation of students’ perspectives on anxiety and speaking. Foreign Language Annals, 23(6), 539-553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1990.tb00424.x
Cited by
- 초등과학영재학생의 과학창의성과 다중지능의 관계 - 생명 영역을 중심으로 - vol.39, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2020.39.3.369
- 식물원 야외체험학습에서 활용 가능한 과학 창의성 과제 개발 - 초등과학영재학생에의 적용 - vol.39, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2020.39.4.506