DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

캐비닛내부응답스펙트럼 산정을 위한 리츠방법의 정식화 및 단순예제를 통한 검증

Formulation and Verification on Ritz Method for In-Cabinet Response Spectrum

  • 투고 : 2019.07.08
  • 심사 : 2019.08.20
  • 발행 : 2019.09.01

초록

Safety-related cabinets and their electrical parts, such as relays and switches in nuclear power plants, should maintain continuous functioning, as well as structural safety according to the nuclear regulatory guidelines. Generally, an electrical part is qualified if its functioning is maintained without abnormality during excitement by motion compatible with the test response spectrum, which is larger than its in-cabinet response spectrum (ICRS). ICRS can be determined by shake-table test or dynamic analysis. Since existing cabinets in use can hardly be stopped and moved, dynamic analysis is preferred over shake-table test in determining ICRS. The simple method, suggested by the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) to determine ICRS, yields conservative or non-conservative results from time to time. In order to determine that the ICRS is better than EPRI method in a simple way, Ritz method considering global and local plate behaviors was suggested by Gupta et al. In this paper, the Ritz method is modified in order to consider the rocking and frame behaviors simultaneously, and it is applied to a simple numerical example for verification. ICRS is determined by Ritz method and compared with the results by finite element method (FEM). Based on this numerical example, recommendations for using Ritz method are suggested.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Korea Electric Power Industry Code (KEPIC). Recommended Practice for Seismic Qualification of Class 1E Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Stations. KEPIC END-2000. c2010.
  2. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE), IEEE Recommended Practice for Seismic Qualification of Class 1E Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Stations. IEEE Std 344. c2005.
  3. Koo KY, Cho SG, Cui J, Kim DK. Seismic response prediction for cabinets of nuclear power plants by using impact hammer test. Nuclear Engineering and Design. 2010;240:2500-2511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.05.008
  4. Cho SG, Joe YH, So GH. Seismic Response Prediction of a Structure Using Experimental Modal Parameters from Impact Tests. Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2010;14(2):75-84.
  5. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). Guidelines for Development of In-Cabinet Seismic Demand for Devices Mounted in Electrical Cainets. EPRI NP-7146-SL. c1995.
  6. Blevins RD. Formulas for natural frequency and mode shape. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co. c1979.
  7. Gupta A, Rustogi SK, Gupta AK. Ritz Vector Apporach for Evaluating Incabinet Response Spectra. Nuclear Engineering and Design. 1999;190(2):255-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(99)00076-X
  8. Yang J, Rustogi SK, Gupta A. Rocking stiffness of mounting arrangements in electrical cabinets and control panels. Nuclear Engineering and Design. 2002;219:127-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(02)00279-0
  9. Chopra AK. Dynamics of Structures. 4th ed. Pearson. California. c2012.