한국해양공학회지 (Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology)

  • 제33권4호
  • /
  • Pages.313-321
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 1225-0767(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-6715(eISSN)
한국해양공학회 (Korean Society of Ocean Engineers)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

OpenFOAM을 이용한 주형체 활주선의 저항 및 항주자세 추정

Prediction of Resistance and Planing Attitude for Prismatic Planing Hull using OpenFOAM

  • 쉬샹위 (국립군산대학교 조선해양공학과) ;
  • 장양 (국립군산대학교 조선해양공학과) ;
  • 염덕준 (국립군산대학교 조선해양공학과)
  • Shi, XiangYu (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Kunsan National University) ;
  • Zhang, Yang (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Kunsan National University) ;
  • Yum, Deuk-joon (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Kunsan National University)
  • 투고 : 2019.07.26
  • 심사 : 2019.08.12
  • 발행 : 2019.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The prediction of the hydrodynamic performance of a planing hull vessel is an important and challenging topic for computational fluid dynamic (CFD) applications to naval hydrodynamics. In this paper, the resistance and planing attitude analysis for a Fridsma hull, which is a prismatic planing hull, in still water are numerically studied using OpenFOAM. OpenFOAM is an open source code package based on C++ libraries and the finite volume method (FVM) for the discretization of the RANS equation. The volume of fluid method (VOF) is used to capture the water-air interface and the SST ${\kappa}-{\omega}$ model is used for the turbulence simulation. The overset mesh method is used to capture the large motion of the hull at higher speeds. Before the extensive analysis, uncertainty analyses using various time steps and grid sizes were performed for one ship speed case of Fn = 1.19. The results of the present study are compared with those of a model test, other CFD research, and Savitsky's empirical formula. The results of the present study, following the trend of other CFD results, slightly over predict the resistance and under predict the sinkage and, more significantly, the trim.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bustos, D.S.H., Alvarado, R.J.P., 2017. Numerical Hull Resistance Calculation of a Catamaran Using OpenFOAM. Ship Science and Technology, 11(21), 29-39. https://doi.org/10.25043/19098642.150
  2. Chevrier, P., Galley, H., 1993. A Van Leer Finite Volume Scheme for The Euler Equations on Unstructured Mesh. Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 27(2), 183-201. https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/1993270201831
  3. Cucinotta, F., Sfravara, F., 2018. Experimental and Numerical Hydrodynamic Analysis of a Planing Hull Pleasure Boat. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 13(1), 30-39.
  4. Fridsma, G., 1969. A Systematic Study of the Rough-water Performance of Planing Boats. Davidson Laboratory Report, 1275.
  5. Fu, T.C., O'Shea, T.T., Judge, C.Q., Dommermuth, D., Brucker, K., Wyatt, D.C., 2012. A Detailed Assessment of Numerical Flow Analysis (NFA) to Predict the Hydrodynamics of a Deep-V Planing Hull. 29th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Gothenburg, Sweden, 26-31.
  6. Go, G.S., Lee, E.T., Ahn, H.T., Kim, S.I., Chun, S.Y., Kim, J.S., Lee, B.H., 2016. 6DOF Simulation and Determination of Hydrodynamic Derivatives of Underwater Tow-Fish Using CFD. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 53(4), 315-328. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2016.53.4.315
  7. Hassan, G., Kamarlouei, M., Veysi, S.T.G., 2015. A Hydrodynamic Methodology and CFD Analysis for Performance Prediction of Stepped Planing Hulls. Polish Maritime Research, 22(2), 23-31. https://doi.org/10.1515/pomr-2015-0014
  8. Islam, H., Soares, C.G., 2017. Prediction of Ship Resistance in Head Waves Using OpenFOAM. Maritime Transportation and Harvesting of Sea Resources, Taylor & Francis Group.
  9. Marcello, I., 2015 Hydrodynamics of Planing Hull by CFD. Thesis Master's Degree in Naval Engineering of Naples University.
  10. Mousaviraad, S.M., Wang, Z.Y., Stern, F., 2015. URANS Studies of Hydrodynammic Performance and Slamming Loads on High-speed Planing Hulls in Calm Water and Waves for Deep and Shallow Conditions. Applied Ocean Reseacch, 51, 222-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2015.04.007
  11. Newmark, N.M., 1959. A Method of Computation for Structural Dynamics. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 85(3), 67-94. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEA3.0000098
  12. OpenCFD Ltd., 2017. OpenFOAM User Guide.
  13. Savitsky, D., 1964. Hydrodynamic Design of Planing Hulls. Marine Technology and SNAME News, 1(4), 71-95. https://doi.org/10.5957/mt1.1964.1.4.71
  14. Stern, F., Wilson, R., Coleman, H.W., Paterson, E., 2001. Comprehensive Approach to Verification and Validation of CFD Simulations -Part 1: Methodology and Procedures. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 123(4), 793-802. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1412235
  15. Wilson, R., Stern, F., Coleman, H.W., Paterson, E., 2001. Comprehensive Approach to Verification and Validation of CFD Simulations -Part 2: Application for Rans Simulation of a Cargo/Container Ship. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 123(4), 803-810. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1412236