Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (대한구강악안면외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A review of complications of maxillary sinus augmentation and available treatment methods

  • Kim, Joongmin (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Private Clinic) ;
  • Jang, Hyonseok (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Korea University Ansan Hospital)
  • Received : 2019.06.10
  • Accepted : 2019.06.19
  • Published : 2019.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Maxillary sinus grafting is a dependable procedure that has been in use for a long time. However, clinical complications often arise. To prevent complications of maxillary sinus grafting, it is necessary to know the contra-indications, both for general implantation and for maxillary bone grafting. In addition, presence of various complications requires careful consideration of treatment method; therefore, dentists should be familiar with the treatment protocols. Complications can be divided into postoperative, immediate postoperative, and delayed postoperative complications. Particularly for the outpatient, it is necessary to quickly distinguish between treatable cases and cases for which transfer is required. The purpose of this review is to discuss the contra-indications, complications, and treatment options for complications of maxillary sinus graft.

Keywords

References

  1. Tatum H Jr. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin North Am 1986;30:207-29.
  2. Bathla SC, Fry RR, Majumdar K. Maxillary sinus augmentation. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2018;22:468-73. https://doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_236_18
  3. Jeong KI, Kim SG, Oh JS, You JS. Implants displaced into the maxillary sinus: a systematic review. Implant Dent 2016;25:547-51. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000408
  4. Schwartz-Arad D, Herzberg R, Dolev E. The prevalence of surgical complications of the sinus graft procedure and their impact on implant survival. J Periodontol 2004;75:511-6. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2004.75.4.511
  5. Jang HY, Kim HC, Lee SC, Lee JY. Choice of graft material in relation to maxillary sinus width in internal sinus floor augmentation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68:1859-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.093
  6. Barone A, Santini S, Sbordone L, Crespi R, Covani U. A clinical study of the outcomes and complications associated with maxillary sinus augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:81-5.
  7. Kim JH, Kim UC, Lee JY, Kim HC, Kim SN. A clinical & radiologic study of bone remodeling effects using rhBMP-2 for maxillary sinus graft. J Dent Implant Res 2016;35:46-52.
  8. Kim YK, Kim JA. Evaluation of factors which affect the prognosis of sinus bone graft and implant placement. J Dent Implant Res 2012;31:31-7.
  9. Hernandez-Alfaro F, Torradeflot MM, Marti C. Prevalence and management of Schneiderian membrane perforations during sinuslift procedures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:91-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01372.x
  10. Ella B, Sedarat C, Noble Rda C, Normand E, Lauverjat Y, Siberchicot F, et al. Vascular connections of the lateral wall of the sinus: surgical effect in sinus augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:1047-52.
  11. Pignataro L, Mantovani M, Torretta S, Felisati G, Sambataro G. ENT assessment in the integrated management of candidate for (maxillary) sinus lift. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2008;28:110-9.
  12. Low WK. Complications of the Caldwell-Luc operation and how to avoid them. Aust N Z J Surg 1995;65:582-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.1995.tb01700.x
  13. Tepper G, Haas R, Schneider B, Watzak G, Mailath G, Jovanovic SA, et al. Effects of sinus lifting on voice quality. A prospective study and risk assessment. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:767-74. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0905-7161.2003.00957.x
  14. Ungor C, Saridogan C, Yilmaz M, Tosun E, Senel FC, Icten O, et al. An acoustical analysis of the effects of maxillary sinus augmentation on voice quality. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013;115:175-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2012.01.035
  15. Cha JY, Mah J, Sinclair P. Incidental findings in the maxillofacial area with 3-dimensional cone-beam imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:7-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.041

Cited by

  1. Radiological changes in maxillary sinus morphology after lateral sinus floor augmentation vol.74, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.1679
  2. Implant Placement Using Palatal Bone in Patients with Severe Maxillary Alveolar Bone Defect: Case Series Study vol.13, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5856/jkds.2020.13.2.73
  3. Cone-beam computed tomography characterization of the intraosseous vascular canal in the lateral wall of the maxillary antrum vol.47, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2021.47.1.34
  4. The rehabilitation of posterior atrophic maxilla by using the graftless option of short implant versus conventional long implant with sinus graft: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized c vol.21, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_400_20
  5. Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopic Investigation of Failed Dental Implants Associated with Odontogenic Maxillary Sinusitis vol.11, pp.8, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11083684
  6. Etiology and Management of Complications Associated with Sinus Augmentation Procedures vol.11, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1723052
  7. Sinus mucosa thinning and perforation after sinus augmentation. A histological study in rabbits vol.25, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-021-00946-y
  8. Sinus Mucosa Thinning and Perforations after Sinus Lifting Performed with Different Xenografts: A Histological Analysis in Rabbits vol.10, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10010002