DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of a mouse model for pulp-dentin complex regeneration research: a preliminary study

  • Kim, Sunil (Microscope Center, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Oral Science Research Center, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Lee, Sukjoon (BK21 PLUS Project, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Jung, Han-Sung (Division in Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Department of Oral Biology, Oral Science Research Center, BK21 PLUS Project, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Sun-Young (Department of Conservative Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Euiseong (Microscope Center, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Oral Science Research Center, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
  • Received : 2019.04.07
  • Accepted : 2019.05.01
  • Published : 2019.05.31

Abstract

Objectives: To achieve pulp-dentin complex regeneration with tissue engineering, treatment efficacies and safeties should be evaluated using in vivo orthotopic transplantation in a sufficient number of animals. Mice have been a species of choice in which to study stem cell biology in mammals. However, most pulp-dentin complex regeneration studies have used large animals because the mouse tooth is too small. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the utility of the mouse tooth as a transplantation model for pulp-dentin complex regeneration research. Materials and Methods: Experiments were performed using 7-week-old male Institute of Cancer Research (ICR) mice; a total of 35 mice had their pulp exposed, and 5 mice each were sacrificed at 1, 2, 4, 7, 9, 12 and 14 days after pulp exposure. After decalcification in 5% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, the samples were embedded and cut with a microtome and then stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Slides were observed under a high-magnification light microscope. Results: Until 1 week postoperatively, the tissue below the pulp chamber orifice appeared normal. The remaining coronal portion of the pulp tissue was inflammatory and necrotic. After 1 week postoperatively, inflammation and necrosis were apparent in the root canals inferior to the orifices. The specimens obtained after experimental day 14 showed necrosis of all tissue in the root canals. Conclusions: This study could provide opportunities for researchers performing in vivo orthotopic transplantation experiments with mice.

Keywords

References

  1. Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am 1974;18:269-296.
  2. Shi S, Bartold PM, Miura M, Seo BM, Robey PG, Gronthos S. The efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells to regenerate and repair dental structures. Orthod Craniofac Res 2005;8:191-199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-6343.2005.00331.x
  3. Huang GT, Yamaza T, Shea LD, Djouad F, Kuhn NZ, Tuan RS, Shi S. Stem/progenitor cell-mediated de novo regeneration of dental pulp with newly deposited continuous layer of dentin in an in vivo model. Tissue Eng Part A 2010;16:605-615. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0518
  4. Steindorff MM, Lehl H, Winkel A, Stiesch M. Innovative approaches to regenerate teeth by tissue engineering. Arch Oral Biol 2014;59:158-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2013.11.005
  5. Asutay F, Polat S, Gul M, Subasi C, Kahraman SA, Karaoz E. The effects of dental pulp stem cells on bone regeneration in rat calvarial defect model: micro-computed tomography and histomorphometric analysis. Arch Oral Biol 2015;60:1729-1735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2015.09.002
  6. Kim S, Shin SJ, Song Y, Kim E. In vivo experiments with dental pulp stem cells for pulp-dentin complex regeneration. Mediators Inflamm 2015;2015:409347.
  7. Altaii M, Broberg M, Cathro P, Richards L. Standardisation of sheep model for endodontic regeneration/revitalisation research. Arch Oral Biol 2016;65:87-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2016.01.008
  8. Tziafas D, Kodonas K, Gogos C, Tziafa C, Papadimitriou S. Dentine-pulp tissue engineering in miniature swine teeth by set calcium silicate containing bioactive molecules. Arch Oral Biol 2017;73:230-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2016.10.023
  9. Yu C, Abbott PV. An overview of the dental pulp: its functions and responses to injury. Aust Dent J 2007;52:S4-S16.
  10. Abbott PV, Yu C. A clinical classification of the status of the pulp and the root canal system. Aust Dent J 2007;52:S17-S31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2007.tb00522.x
  11. Bergenholtz G. Effect of bacterial products on inflammatory reactions in the dental pulp. Scand J Dent Res 1977;85:122-129.
  12. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF. Endodontology: an integrated biological and clinical view. London: Quintessence Publishing Co. Ltd.; 2013.
  13. Heyeraas KJ, Berggreen E. Interstitial fluid pressure in normal and inflamed pulp. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1999;10:328-336. https://doi.org/10.1177/10454411990100030501
  14. Goldberg M. The dental pulp: biology, pathology, and regenerative therapies. Heidelberg: Springer; 2013.
  15. Hahn CL, Liewehr FR. Update on the adaptive immune responses of the dental pulp. J Endod 2007;33:773-781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.01.002
  16. Renard E, Gaudin A, Bienvenu G, Amiaud J, Farges JC, Cuturi MC, Moreau A, Alliot-Licht B. Immune cells and molecular networks in experimentally induced pulpitis. J Dent Res 2016;95:196-205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034515612086

Cited by

  1. PRIASE 2021 guidelines for reporting animal studies in Endodontology: explanation and elaboration vol.54, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13481