참고문헌
- Ahmad AL, Ismail S, Bhatia S. Water recycling from palm oil mill effluent (POME) using membrane technology. Desalination 2003;157:87-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(03)00387-4
- Mohammad AW, Ng CY, Lim YP, Ng GH. Ultrafiltration in food processing industry: Review on application, membrane fouling, and fouling control. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2012;5: 1143-1156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-012-0806-9
- Ahmaruzzaman M. Adsorption of phenolic compounds on low-cost adsorbents: A review. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2008;143:48-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2008.07.002
- Ahmad AL, Sumathi S, Hameed BH. Residual oil and suspended solid removal using natural adsorbents chitosan, bentonite and activated carbon: A comparative study. Chem. Eng. J. 2005;108: 179-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2005.01.016
- Van Reis R, Zydney A. Membrane separations in biotechnology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2001;12:208-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-1669(00)00201-9
- Wu TY, Mohammad AW, Jahim JM, Anuar N. Palm oil mill effluent (POME) treatment and bioresources recovery using ultrafiltration membrane: Effect of pressure on membrane fouling. Biochem. Eng. J. 2007;35:309-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2007.01.029
- Azmi NS, Yunos KF. Wastewater treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME) by ultrafiltration membrane separation technique coupled with adsorption treatment as pre-treatment. Agric. Agric. Sci. Procedia 2014;2:257-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2014.11.037
- Tardieu E, Grasmick A, Geaugey V, Manem J. Influence of hydrodynamics on fouling velocity in a recirculated MBR for wastewater treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 1999;156:131-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(98)00343-3
- Ognier S, Wisniewski C, Grasmick A. Influence of macromolecule adsorption during filtration of a membrane bioreactor mixed liquor suspension. J. Membr. Sci. 2002;209:27-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(02)00123-0
- Mirsaeedghazi H, Emam-Djomeh Z, Mousavi SM, Aroujalian A, Navidbakhsh M. Clarification of pomegranate juice by microfiltration with PVDF membranes. Desalination 2010;264:243-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.03.031
- Tansel B, Dizge N, Tansel IN. Analysis of high resolution flux data to characterize fouling profiles of membranes with different MWCO under different filtration modes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2017;173:200-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.09.032
- Nourbakhsh H, Alemi A, Emam-Djomeh Z, Mirsaeedghazi H. Effect of processing parameters on fouling resistances during microfiltration of red plum and watermelon juices: A comparative study. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014;51:168-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0472-3
- Na J, Yonggang Z. The effect of humic acid on ultrafiltration membrane fouling. Energ. Procedia 2012;11:4821-4829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.10.915
- Jun Z, Yang FL, Meng FG, Peng AN, Di WA. Comparison of membrane fouling during short-term filtration of aerobic granular sludge and activated sludge. J. Environ. Sci. 2007;19:1281-1286. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(07)60209-5
- Hammer MJ. Water and wastewater technology. Singapore: Prentice Hall. 1986. p. 519.
- Susanto H, Ulbricht M. Photografted thin polymer hydrogel layers on PES ultrafiltration membranes: Characterization, stability, and influence on separation performance. Langmuir 2007;23:7818-7830. https://doi.org/10.1021/la700579x
- Puro L, Kallioinen M, Mänttari M, Natarajan G, Cameron DC, Nystrom M. Performance of RC and PES ultrafiltration membranes in filtration of pulp mill process waters. Desalination 2010;264:249-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.06.034
- Yorgun MS, Balcioglu IA, Saygin O. Performance comparison of ultrafiltration, nanofiltration and reverse osmosis on whey treatment. Desalination 2008;229:204-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.09.008
- Chollangi A, Hossain MM. Separation of proteins and lactose from dairy wastewater. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensification 2007;46:398-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2006.05.022
- Nakatsuka S, Michaels AS. Transport and separation of proteins by ultrafiltration through sorptive and non-sorptive membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1992;69:189-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(92)80039-M
- Boyd RF, Zydney AL. Sieving characteristics of multilayer ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1997;131:155-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(97)00045-8
- Mohammadi T, Esmaeelifar A. Wastewater treatment using ultrafiltration at a vegetable oil factory. Desalination 2004;166: 329-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2004.06.087
- Kang SK, Choo KH. Use of MF and UF membranes for reclamation of glass industry wastewater containing colloidal clay and glass particles. J. Membr. Sci. 2003;223:89-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(03)00311-9
- Lee N, Amy G, Croue JP, Buisson H. Morphological analyses of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of low-pressure membranes (MF/UF). J. Membr. Sci. 2005;261:7-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.02.039
- Choi H, Zhang K, Dionysiou D, Oerther DB, Sorial GA. Influence of cross-flow velocity on membrane performance during filtration of biological. J. Membr. Sci. 2005;248:189-199 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2004.08.027
- Mourad H, Martine MP. Analysis of deposit behaviour in crossflow microfiltration by means of thickness measurement. Chem. Eng. J. 2002;86:251-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1385-8947(01)00184-X
피인용 문헌
- Innovative Optical-Sensing Technology for the Online Fouling Characterization of Silicon Carbide Membranes during the Treatment of Oily Water vol.20, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/s20041161
- Review on current approach for treatment of palm oil mill effluent: Integrated system vol.286, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112209