Social Theory in the Anthropocene 1. Catastrophe and Patiency

인류세의 사회이론 1: 파국과 페이션시(patiency)

  • Received : 2019.06.14
  • Accepted : 2019.10.29
  • Published : 2019.11.30

Abstract

First proposed by Paul Crutzen and Eugene Stoermer in 2000, the concept of the Anthropocene has had staggering repercussions in a variety of disciplines. In response to the Anthropocene narrative as a problematization of the eco-ontological emergency that humanity is confronted with in the 21st-century, I will deal with the following theoretical themes in this article. Firstly, I will analyze the central agendas underlying the Anthropocene discourse: the expansion of human agency into the planetary level and the possibility of unprecedented catastrophes in the near future. Secondly, I will propose to address the Anthropocene discourse as problem-assemblage. Thirdly, I will examine Clive Himilton and Dipesh Chakrabarty's theses in order to understand the shock that was brought to bear on the humanities and social sciences by the Anthropocene narrative. Fourthly, I will reinterpret the allegory of the angel appearing in Benjamin's Theses on the Philosophy of History to explore new possibilities of transformative becoming of the subjectivity, focusing on the concept of patiency. Finally, I will present the concept of reflexive catastrophism.

2000년에 크루첸과 스토머에 의해 제안된 '인류세' 개념은 다수 학문분과에 큰 반향을 일으키고 있다. 21세기 인류(생명)가 대면하고 있는 생태-존재론적 비상상태에 대한 가장 강력한 문제제기인 인류세 담론에 대한 사회이론의 응답의 한 시도로서, 이 연구는 다음의 문제들을 다루고자 한다. 첫째, 인류세 담론의 핵심의제를 인간 행위능력의 행성적 신장과 임박한 파국이라는 관점에서 분석한다. 둘째, 인류세 담론을 들뢰즈와 가타리적 의미의 어셈블리지(문제-어셈블리지)로 이해하기를 제안한다. 셋째, 해밀턴과 차크라바티의 테제들을 분석함으로써, 인류세가 인문, 사회과학에 가져온 충격을 진단한다. 넷째, 발터 벤야민의 '역사의 천사' 이미지를 분석하고, 파국에 내포된 변형적 생성의 가능성을 감수능력, 혹은 페이션시(patiency) 개념을 중심으로 진단한다. 다섯째, 재귀적/성찰적 파국주의 개념을 제시하고, 파국에 대한 새로운 관점을 제안한다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김홍중 (2014), 마음의 사회학을 이론화하기, 한국사회학, 제48권 제4호, 179-213쪽.
  2. 김홍중 (2015), 꿈에 대한 사회학적 성찰, 경제와사회, 제108권, 32-72쪽.
  3. 김홍중 (2016), 사회학적 파상력, 서울: 문학동네.
  4. 김환석 (2012), 이원론에 기초한 사회학 벗어나기, 사회과학연구, 제24권 제2호, 203-228쪽.
  5. 김환석 (2016), 사회과학의 '물질적 전환(material turn)을 위하여, 경제와사회, 제112권, 208-231쪽.
  6. 김환석 (2018), 새로운 사회학의 모색(1) 탈인간중심주의, 경제와 사회, 제117권, 236-261쪽.
  7. 제레드 다이아몬드, 강양구 번역 (2005), 문명의 붕괴, 서울: 김영사.
  8. 질 들뢰즈 & 펠릭스 가타리, 김재인 번역 (1996), 천 개의 고원, 서울: 새물결.
  9. 브뤼노 라투르, 홍철기 번역 (2009), 우리는 결코 근대인이었던 적이없다, 서울: 갈무리.
  10. 미카엘 뢰비, 양창렬 번역 (2017), 발터 벤야민: 화재경보, 서울: 난장.
  11. 울리히 벡, 홍성태 번역 (1997), 위험사회, 서울: 새물결.
  12. 인류세워킹그룹. http://quaternary.stratigraphy.org/working-groups/anthropocene/
  13. 정태석 (2002), 벡의 재귀적 현대화이론과 개인화의 딜레마, 경제와사회, 제55권, 246-271쪽.
  14. 클라이브 해밀턴, 정서진 번역 (2018), 인류세, 서울: 이상북스.
  15. Agamben, G. (2000), Le temps qui reste, J. Revel trad, Paris: Payot.
  16. Archer, S. A. (2007). Making our Way through the World, Cambridge University Press.
  17. Autin, W. J. & Holbrook, J. M. (2012), "Is the Anthropocene an Issue of Stratigraphy or Pop Culture", GSA Today, Vol. 22, pp. 60-61. https://doi.org/10.1130/G153GW.1
  18. Barad, K. (2003), "Posthumanist Performativity", Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, Vol. 28, No 3, pp. 801-831. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321
  19. Barnosky, A. D., Hadly E. A., Dirzo, R., Fortelius, M., Stenseth, N. C. (2014), "Translating Science for Decision Makers to Help Navigate the Anthropocene", The Anthropocene Review, Vol. 1, No 2, pp. 160-170. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019614533670
  20. Baskin, J. (2015), "Paradigm Dressed as Epoch. The Ideology of the Anthropocene", Environmental Values, Vol. 24, pp. 9-29. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327115X14183182353746
  21. Beck, U. (1994), "The Reinvention of Politics", in U. Beck, A. Giddens, and S. Lash eds., Reflexive Modernization, pp. 1-55, Cambridge: Polity.
  22. Benjamin, W. (1972-1989), Gesammelte Schriften, Frankfurt a. M. Surhkamp, Verlag.
  23. Berlant, L. (2010), "Cruel Optimism", in M. Gregg & G. J. Seigworth eds., The Affective Theory Reader, pp. 93-117, Durham & London: Duke University Press.
  24. Braidotti, R. (2013), The Posthuman, Cambridge: Polity.
  25. Castree, N., Adams W. M., Barry J., Brockington, D., Büscher B., Corbera E., (...) Wynne B. (2014), "Changing the Intellectual Climate", Nature Climate Change, Vol. 4, pp. 763-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2339
  26. Charkrabarty, D. (2009), "The Climate of History. Four Theses", Critical Inquiry, Vol. 35, pp. 197-222. https://doi.org/10.1086/596640
  27. Charkrabarty, D. (2015), "The Human Condition in the Anthropocene", The Tanner Lectures in Human Values, Yale University, pp. 137-188.
  28. Corlett, R. T. (2015), "The Anthropocene Concept in Ecology and Conservation", Trends in Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 36-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.10.007
  29. Crist, E. (2013), "On the Poverty of our Nomenclature", Environmental Humanities, Vol. 3, pp. 129-147. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3611266
  30. Crutzen P. J. and Stoermer, E. F. (2000), "The 'Anthropocene'", The International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP) Newsletter, Vol. 41, pp. 17-18.
  31. Crutzen P. J. (2002), "Geology of Mankind", Nature, Vol. 415, p. 23. https://doi.org/10.1038/415023a
  32. Crutzen P. J. (2006), "The 'Anthropocene'", in E. Ehlers & T. Krafft eds., Earth system Science in the Anthropocene, pp. 13-18, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
  33. Crutzen P. J. and Steffen, W. (2003), "How Long Have We been in the Anthropocene Era?", Climatic Change, Vol. 61, pp. 251-257. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CLIM.0000004708.74871.62
  34. Dean, M. (1999), "Risk, calculable and incalculable", in D. Lupton ed., Risk and Sociolcultural Theory, pp. 131-159, Cambridge University Press.
  35. Delanda, M. (2006), A New Philosophy of Society, Continuum.
  36. Delanda, M. (2016), Assemblage Theory, Edinburgh University Press.
  37. Deleuze, G. & Parnet, C. (1996), Dialogues, Paris: Flammarion.
  38. Dubet, F. (1994), Sociologie de l'experience, Paris: Seuil.
  39. Dupuy, J.-P. (2002), Pour un catastrophisme eclaire, Paris: Seuil.
  40. Ellis, E., Maslin M., Boivin N., Bauder A. (2016), "Involve Social Scientists in Defining the Anthropocene", Nature, Vol. 540, pp. 192-193. https://doi.org/10.1038/540192a
  41. Ellis, E. (2018), Anthropocene. A Very Short Introduction, Oxford University Press.
  42. Foucault, M. (2001), L'hermeneutique du sujet, Paris: Gallimard/Seuil.
  43. Fox, N. & Alldred, P. (2016), Sociology and the New Materialism, Sage.
  44. Guattari, F. (2006), Chaosmosis, Sydney: Power Publications.
  45. Guattari, F. (2008), Les trois ecologies, Paris: Galilee.
  46. Hamilton, C. (2015a), "Human Destiny in the Anthropocene", in C. Hamilton, Ch. Bonneuil, and F. Gemenne eds., The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis, pp. 32-43, London and New York: Routledge.
  47. Hamilton, C. (2015b), "The Theodicy of the "Good Anthropocene"", Environmental Humanities, Vol. 7, pp. 233-238. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3616434
  48. Hamilton, C., Bonneuil, Ch., & Gemenne, F. (2015), "Thinking the Anthropocene", C. Hamilton, C. Bonneuil, and F. Gemenne eds., in The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis, pp. 1-14, London and New York: Routledge.
  49. Haraway, D. (2015), "Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene. Making Kin", Environmental Humanities, Vol. 6, pp. 159-165. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3615934
  50. Haraway, D. (2016), Staying with the Trouble, Duke University Press.
  51. Harman, G. (2016), Immaterialism, Cambridege: Polity.
  52. Harman, G. (2017), Object-Oriented Ontology, Penguin Books.
  53. Haynes, P. (2014), "Creative Becoming and the Patiency of Matter", Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 129-150.
  54. Heidegger, M. (1990), "Lettre sur l'humanisme", in J. Beaufret et al trad., Questions III et IV, pp. 65-127, Paris: Gallimard.
  55. Hooke, R. L. (2000), "On the History of Humans as Geomorphic Agents", Geology, Vol. 28, No. 9, pp. 843-846. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(2000)28<843:OTHOHA>2.0.CO;2
  56. Karlsson, M. M. (2002), "Agency and Patiency", Philosophical Explorations, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 59-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/10002002018538722
  57. Kunstler, J. H. (2005), The Long Emergency, New York: Atlantic Monthly Press.
  58. Lash, S. (1994), "Reflexivity and Its Doubles", in U. Beck, A. Giddens, and S. Lash eds., Reflexive Modernization, pp. 100-173, Cambridge: Polity.
  59. Lash, S. (2018), Experiences, Cambridge: Polity.
  60. Latour, B. (1988), The Pasteurization of France, trans. A. Sheridan & J. Law, Harvard University Press.
  61. Latour, B. (2010), "An Attempt at a "Compositionist Manifesto"", New Literary History, Vol. 41, pp. 471-490.
  62. Latour, B. (2017), Facing Gaia, Cambridge: Polity.
  63. Lynch, A. H. & Veland, S. (2018), Urgency in the Anthropocene, The MIT Press.
  64. Malm, A. & Hornborg, A. (2014), "The Geology of Mankind?", The Anthropocene Review, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 62-69. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019613516291
  65. Massumi, B. (2015), Politics of Affect, Cambridge: Polity.
  66. McNeill, J. R. & Engelke, P. (2016), The Great Acceleration, Harvard University Press.
  67. Moore, J. (2016), "The Rise of Cheap Nature". in J. W. Moore ed., Anthropocene or Capitalocene?, pp. 78-115, PM Press.
  68. Morton, T. (2013). Hyperobjects. Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press.
  69. Muller, M. (2015), "Assemblages and Actor-networks", Geography Compass, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 27-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12192
  70. Palsson, G., Szerszynski B., Sörlin S., Marks J., Avril B., Crumley C., (...) Weehuizen R. (2013), "Reconceptualizing the 'Anthropos' in the Anthropocene", Environmental Science & Policy, Vol. 28, pp. 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.004
  71. Reader, S. (2007), "The Other Side of Agency", Philosophy, Vol. 82, No. 4, pp. 579-604. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031819107000162
  72. Reader, S. (2010). "Agency, Patiency, and Personhood", in T. O'Connor and C. Sandis eds., A Companion to the Philosophy of Action, pp. 200-208, Blackwell Publishing.
  73. Ruddiman, W. F. (2003), "The Anthropocene Greenhouse Era Began Thousand of Years Ago", Climate Change, Vol. 61, pp. 261-293. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CLIM.0000004577.17928.fa
  74. Scholem, G. (1995), Benjamin et son ange, Paris: Rivages.
  75. Smith B. D. & Zeder, M. A. (2013), "The Onset of the Anthropocene", Anthropocene, Vol. 4, pp. 8-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2013.05.001
  76. Steffen, W., Crutzen P., McNeill J. (2007), "The Anthropocene. Are Humans Now Overwhelming the Great Forces of Nature", Ambio, Vol. 36, pp. 614-621. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[614:TAAHNO]2.0.CO;2
  77. Steffen, W., Grinevald J., Crutzen P., McNeill J. (2011a), "The Anthropocene. Conceptual and Historical Perspectives", Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Series A, Vol. 369, pp. 842-867. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0327
  78. Steffen, W., Persoon Å., Deutsch L., Zalasiewicz J., Williams M., Richardson K., (...) Svedin U. (2011b), "The Anthropocene. From Global Change to Planetary Stewardship", Ambio, Vol. 40, pp. 739-761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-011-0185-x
  79. Steffen, W. (2015), "The Trajectory of the Anthropocene. The Great Acceleration", The Anthropocene Review, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 81-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019614564785
  80. Stiglitz, J. (2004), The Roaring Nineties, New York: W.W. Norton.
  81. Urry, J. (2016), What is the Future?, Cambridge: Polity.
  82. Veland, S., Scoville-Simonds M., Gram-Hanssen I., Schorre A. K., Khoury A. Nordbo M. J. (...) Bjorkan M. (2018), "Narrative Matters for Sustainability", Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Vol. 31, pp. 41-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.12.005
  83. Wilkinson, B. H. (2005), "Humans as Geologic Agents", Geology, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 161-164. https://doi.org/10.1130/g21108.1
  84. Wittgenstein, L. (1978), Philosophical Investigations. G. E. M. Anscombe trans, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  85. Zalasiewicz, J., Smith A., Barry T. L., Coe A. L., Bown P. R., Brenchley P., (...) Stone Ph. (2008), "Are We Now Living In the Anthropocene?", GSA Today, Vol. 18, pp. 4-8.
  86. Zalasiewicz, J., Waters C. N., Williams M., Barnosky A. D., Cearreta A., Crutzen P., (...) Oreskes N. (2014), "When Did the Anthropocene Begin?", Quaternary International, Vol. 383, pp. 196-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2014.11.045