Journal of Engineering Education Research (공학교육연구)

Korean Society for Engineering Education (한국공학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Creative Ideation Using a Structured Approach - Focused on a Comparative Results of SIT and BS

구조화된 접근법을 이용한 창의적 발상에 관한 연구 - SIT와 BS의 결과비교를 중심으로

  • Chung, Won-il (School of Computer Science and Engineering, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, Kwang-Pil (Dong-Eui Institute of Technology, Series of Management) ;
  • SONG, HAEGEUN (Dong-Eui Institute of Technology, Series of Management)
  • 정원일 (경북대학교 컴퓨터학부) ;
  • 김광필 (동의과학대학교 경영계열) ;
  • 송해근 (동의과학대학교 경영계열)
  • Received : 2019.03.20
  • Accepted : 2019.06.06
  • Published : 2019.07.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to introduce a modified CPS(Creativity Problem Solving) procedure as a new method for comparative analysis of creative techniques such as SIT(Systematic Inventive Thinking) and Brainstorming(BS) techniques. For this, a new sports game is employed as a case study. The results show that the ideas from SIT are more creative in terms of originality and practicality than those of BS. Several considerations for effective practical use of the proposed method are discussed in this study.

Keywords

References

  1. 김대영 외(2005). 공학전문가가 인식하는 공학기초능력의 구성요소에 관한 연구, 공학교육연구, 34-51
  2. 김태영.김중현.박영택(2018). TRIZ의 핵심 발명원리를 이용한 발명적 사고도구의 개선, 품질경영학회지, 46(2), 259-268. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2018.46.2.259
  3. 강익선.송해근.박영택(2016). 아이디어의 창의성과 고객만족의 측정에 관한 연구, 품질경영학회지, 44(1), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2016.44.1.139
  4. 박영택(2015). 품질경영과 창의혁신, 품질경영학회지, 43(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2015.43.1.001
  5. 여형석.박영택(2017). 플립드 러닝과 마인드 원더링이 아이디어 창출에 미치는 영향: SIT 와 BCC 의 활용을 중심으로, 공학교육연구, 20(5), 23-33. https://doi.org/10.18108/JEER.2017.20.5.23
  6. 허건.송해근.박영택(2016). 창의적인 식품 개발에 있어서 SIT의 효과성에 관한 연구 - H사의 신제품을 중심으로, 품질경영학회지, 44(1), 95-108. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2016.44.1.095
  7. Barak, M.(2009). Idea focusing versus idea generating: a course for teachers on inventive problem solving. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(4), 345-356. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290903301743
  8. Boyd, D., & J. Goldenberg(2013). Inside the Box: A Proven System of Creativity for Breakthrough Results, Simon & Schuster.
  9. Chapple, M., & Murphy, R.(1996). The nominal group technique: extending the evaluation of students' teaching and learning experiences. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293960210204
  10. Couger, J. D.(1995). Creative Problem Solving and Opportunity Finding. Boyd & Fraser Publishing Company.
  11. De Bono, E.(1970). Lateral Thinking: Be More Creative and Productive.
  12. Finke, R. A., & Slayton, K.(1988). Explorations of Creative Visual Synthesis in Mental Imagery, Memory & Cognition, 16(3), 252-257. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197758
  13. Gallupe, R. B. et al.(1992). Electronic brainstorming and group size. Academy of Management Journal, 35(2), 350-369. https://doi.org/10.2307/256377
  14. Goldenberg, J., & Mazursky, D.(2002). Creativity in Product Innovation. Cambridge University Press.
  15. Gordon, W. J.(1961). Synectics: The Development of Creative Capacity.
  16. Guilford, J. P.(1963). Intellectual resources and their values as seen by scientists. Scientific Creativity: Its Recognition and Development, 101-18.
  17. Harvey, N., & Holmes, C. A.(2012). Nominal group technique: an effective method for obtaining group consensus. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 18(2), 188-194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-172X.2012.02017.x
  18. Horowitz, R.(1999). Creative Problem Solving in Engineering Design, PhD. diss., Tel-Aviv University.
  19. Mayer, R. E.(1999). 22 Fifty Years of Creativity Research. Handbook of creativity, 449.
  20. Michalko, M.(2011). Cracking Creativity: The Secrets of Creative Genius. Ten Speed Press.
  21. Noble, J.S.(1998). An approach for engineering curriculum integration in capstone design courses, Internation Journal of Engineering Education, 14(3). 197-203
  22. Osborn, A. F.(1963). Applied Imagination; Principles and Procedures of Creative Problem-solving (3rd ed.) New York: Scribner.
  23. Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G.(2013). Criteria for evaluating group decision-making methods, Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process Springer, Boston, MA.(295-318).
  24. Schwab K.(2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Crown Publishing Group.
  25. Wycoff, J.(1991). Mindmapping: Your Personal Guide to Exploring Creativity and Problem-solving. New York: Berkley Books.
  26. VanGundy, A. B.(1983). Brainwriting for New Product Ideas: An Alternative to Brainstorming.