Fig. 1 Schematic triangular unit models (OST, OTT, and CTT)18)
Fig. 2 Stress-strain diagram of bilinear material model21)
Fig. 3 Relative elastic modulus as a function of relative density
Fig. 4 Relative compressive yield strength as a function of relative density
Table 1. Summary ideal solutions for triangular unit models18)
Table 2. Mechanical property for a human bone
Table 3. Mechanical property for a bone replacement
References
- Gibson, L. J., The mechanical behaviour of cancellous bone. Journal of Biomechanics, 18, 5, pp. 317-328, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(85)90287-8
- Bayraktar, H. H. A study. Dassault Systemes SIMULIA Corp., Abaqus Technology Brief TB-03-HTB-1, Revised: April, 2007.
-
Mittra, E., et al: Evaluation of trabecular mechanical and microstructural properties in human calcaneal bone of advanced age using mechanical testing,
${\mu}$ CT, and DXA. Journal of Biomechanics, 41, pp. 368-375, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.09.003 - Yeni, Y. N. et al.: Trabecular shear stress in human vertebral cancellous bone: intra- and inter-individual variations, Bone, 44, pp. 130-136, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2008.09.002
- Buckley, J. M., Loo, Kenneth, Motherway, Julie Comparison of quantitative computed tomographybased measures in predicting vertebral compressive strength. Bone, 40, 3, pp. 767-774, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2006.10.025
- Chamarthy, P., et al: Image analysis techniques for characterizing disc space narrowing in cervical vertebrae interfaces. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 28, 1, pp. 39-50, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2003.10.001
- Carter, D. R., Hayes,W.C,. The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 59, pp. 954-962, 1977. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-197759070-00021
- Williams, J.L., Lewis, J.L., Properties and an anisotropic model of cancellous bone from the proximal tiabial epiphysis. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 104, 1, pp. 50-56, 1982. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3138303
- Odgaard, A., Hvid, I., and Linde, F., Compressive axial strain distributions in cancellous bone specimens. Journal of Biomechanics, 22, pp. 829, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(89)90066-3
- Mullerab, R., Ruegseggerab, P., Analysis of mechanical properties of cancellous bone under conditions of simulated bone atrophy. Journal of Biomechanics, 29, 8, pp. 1053-1060, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(96)00006-1
- Carter, D.R., Hayes,W.C., Bone compressive strength: the influence ofdensity and strain rate. Science, 194, 4270, pp. 1174-1176, 1976. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.996549
- Gibson, L.J., Ashby, M.F., Cellular solids-structure and properties, 2nd ed.. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
- Cowin, S.C., Bone mechanics-handbook, ed. Second. Boca Raton, FL, USA. Informa Healthcare, 1988.
- Curry, J. D., Foreman, J., Laketic, I., Effects of ionizing radiation on the mechanical properties of human bone. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 15, pp. 111-117, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100150116
- Fyhrie, D. P., Vashishth, D., Bone stiffness predicts strength similarly for human vertebral cancellous bone in compression and for cortical bone in tension. Bone, 26, 2, pp. 169-173, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8756-3282(99)00246-X
- An, Y.H., Draughn, R.A., Mechanical Testing of Bone and the Bone-Implant Interface, ed. 1st. CRC Press, 2000.
- Homminga, J., et al: Cancellous bone mechanical properties from normals and patients with hip fractures differ on the structure level, not on the bone hard tissue level. Bone, 30, 5, pp. 759-764, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8756-3282(02)00693-2
- Choi, J. Expected Ideal Solution and Verified By Numerical Analysis for a Triangular Unit Cell Model, International Journal of Advanced Robotics and Automation, 3, 2, pp.1-10, 2018. https://doi.org/10.15226/2473-3032/3/2/00133
- Burstein, A.H., Reilly, D.T., Martens, M., Aging of bone tissue:mechanical properties. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American, 58, pp. 82-86, 1976. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-197658010-00015
- Evans, F.G., Lebow, M., Regional differences in some of the physical properties of the human femur. Journal of Applied Physiology, 3, pp. 563-572, 1951. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1951.3.9.563
- Fluhrer Jeffery, DEFORM 2D Version 8.1 User's Manual, 1997.
- Material Properties Data - AK steel 304 Austen Stainless Steel. [http://www.matweb.com/search/DataSheet.aspx?MatGUID=abc4415b0f8b490387e3c922237098da&ckck=1.] (2018).
- Material Properties Data - Arcam ASTM F-75 Cobalt Chrome Alloy. [http://www.matweb.com/search/DataSheet.aspx?MatGUID=df8d3cd30d5149cfaca9a3c6e3268655] (2018).
- Material Properties Data - Titanium Ti-6Al-4V (Grade 5), Annealed. [cited 2018; Available from: http://www.matweb.com/search/DataSheet.aspx?MatGUID=a0655d261898456b958e5f825ae85390](2018).
- In-Bae Seung, Hyo-Seon Baek, Jeong-hwan Park, Overseas Case Study of 3D Printing Technology for Construction and Commercialization Plan in Korea, The Korean Society of Industry Convergence, 12, pp. 273-284, 2018.