DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Finite element analysis of long-term changes of the breast after augmentation mammoplasty: Implications for implant design

  • Myung, Yujin (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ajou University Medical Center, Ajou University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Jong-Gu (Smart Structures and Design Lab, School of Mechanics and Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Cho, Maenghyo (Smart Structures and Design Lab, School of Mechanics and Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Heo, Chan Yeong (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2019.03.23
  • Accepted : 2019.06.12
  • Published : 2019.07.15

Abstract

The development of breast implant technology continues to evolve over time, but changes in breast shape after implantation have not been fully elucidated. Thus, we performed computerized finite element analysis in order to better understand the trajectory of changes and stress variation after breast implantation. The finite element analysis of changes in breast shape involved two components: a static analysis of the position where the implant is inserted, and a dynamic analysis of the downward pressure applied in the direction of gravity during physical activity. Through this finite element analysis, in terms of extrinsic changes, it was found that the dimensions of the breast implant and the position of the top-point did not directly correspond to the trajectory of changes in the breast after implantation. In addition, in terms of internal changes, static and dynamic analysis showed that implants with a lower top-point led to an increased amount of stress applied to the lower thorax. The maximum stress values were 1.6 to 2 times larger in the dynamic analysis than in the static analysis. This finding has important implications for plastic surgeons who are concerned with long-term changes or side effects, such as bottoming-out, after anatomic implant placement.

Keywords

References

  1. Rocco N, Rispoli C, Moja L, et al. Different types of implants for reconstructive breast surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;(5):CD010895.
  2. Rowe NM, Freund R. The autologous internal breast splint: a novel technique for the treatment of postaugmentation ptosis. Aesthet Surg J 2005;25:587-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asj.2005.09.014
  3. Georgii J, Eder M, Burger K, et al. A computational tool for preoperative breast augmentation planning in aesthetic plastic surgery. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2014;18:907-19. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2013.2285308
  4. Pianigiani S, Ruggiero L, Innocenti B. An anthropometric-based subject-specific finite element model of the human breast for predicting large deformations. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2015;3:201.
  5. Rynkevic R, Martins P, Parente M, et al. Implant shape influence on the mechanical behavior of breast implants. Presented at 2013 IEEE 3rd Portuguese Meeting in Bioengineering (ENBENG); 2013.
  6. De Cholnoky T. Present status of augmentation mammaplasty. Conn Med 1970;34:808-9.