Figure 1. Organization of thinking
Figure 2. Epistemic Thinking in the reflections written for the first ABI activity and the fifth ABI activity
Figure 3. Helpful ABI activity stages for understanding science knowledge
Figure 4. Interesting ABI activity stages for active participation
Figure 5. Difficult ABI activity stages for active participation
Table 1. Argument-Based Inquiry step applying students’ claim modifications
Table 2. Topics of Argument-Based Inquiry(ABI) activities
Table 3. Epistemic thinking in the written reflections analysis framework
Table 4. Epistemic Thinking in the reflections written for the first ABI activity and the fifth ABI activity
Table 5. Epistemic Thinking variety level in the reflections written for the first ABI activity and the fifth ABI activity
Table 6. Changes through the argument-based inquiry science class
References
- Barzilai, S., & Zohar, A. (2014). Reconsidering personal epistemology as metacognition: A multifaceted approach to the analysis of epistemic thinking. Educational Psychologist, 49(1), 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.863265
- Barzilai, S., & Zohar, A. (2016). Epistemic (meta) cognition: Ways of thinking about knowledge and knowing. In Greene, J. A., Sandoval, W. A., & Braten, I. (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition(pp. 409-424). New York: Routledge.
- Chinn, C. A., & Buckland, L. A. (2012). Model-based instruction: Fostering change in evolutionary conceptions and in epistemic practices. In K. S. Rosengren, E. M. Evans, S. K. Brem, & G. M. Sinatra(Eds.), Evolution challenges: Integrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution, (pp.211-232). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Retrieved, from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/ CCSSI_ELA%20Standards.pdf
- Efklides, A. (2002). The systemic nature of metacognitive experiences. In P. Chambres, M. Izaute, & P.-J. Marescaux (Eds.), Metacognition: Process, Function and Use (pp. 19-34). Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
- Efklides, A. (2006). Metacognition and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process?. Educational Research Review, 1(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2005.11.001
- Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition: Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13(4), 277. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.13.4.277
- Elby, A., & Hammer, D. (2001). On the substance of a sophisticated epistemology. Science Education, 85(5), 554-567. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1023
- Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
- Ford, M. J. (2012). A dialogic account of sense-making in scientific argumentation and reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 30(3), 207-245. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2012.689383
- Goldman, S. R., Lawless, K. A., Gomez, K. W., Braasch, J., McLeod, S., & Manning, F.(2010). Literacy in the digital world: Comprehending and learning from multiple sources. In M. G. McKeown & L. Kucan (Eds.), Bringing reading research to life (pp. 257-284). New York, NY: Guilford.
- Gray, D. E. (2007). Facilitating management learning: Developing critical reflection through reflective tools. Management learning, 38(5), 495-517. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507607083204
- Hand, B., Meier, L. N., Staker, J., & Bintz, J. (2006). When science and literacy meet in the secondary learning space: Implementing the science writing heuristic (SWH). University of Iowa.
- Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational psychologist, 41(2), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
- Hofer, B. K. (2005). The legacy and the challenges: Paul Pintrich's contributions to personal epistemology research. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4002_4
- Hullfish, H. G., & Smith, P. G. (1961). Reflective thinking: The method of education. New York: Dodd, Mead & Company.
- Jang, K., Nam, J., & Choi, A. (2012). The Effects of Argument- Based Inquiry Using the Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) Approach on Argument Structure in Students' Writing. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(7), 1099-1108. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.7.1099
- Keys, C. W., Hand, B., Prain, V., & Collins, S. (1999). Using the science writing heuristic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigations in secondary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 1065-1084. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199912)36:10<1065::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-I
- Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331-359. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290404
- Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L. A. (2013). New literacies: A dual level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment. In N. Unrau & D. Alvermann(Eds.), Theoretical models and process of reading(pp. 1150-1181). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
- Lee, S., Bak, D., & Nam, J. (2015). Impact of Peer Assessment Activities on High School Students Argumentation in Argument-Based Inquiry. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 35(3), 353-361. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.3.0353
- Ministry Of Education. (2015). 2015 Revised national curriculum. MOE, Notice No. 2015-74.
- Muis, K. R. (2007). The role of epistemic beliefs in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 42(3), 173-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701416306
- Muis, K. R., Trevors, G., & Chevrier, M. (2016). Epistemic climate for epistemic change. In Greene, J. A., Sandoval, W. A., & Braten, I. (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition(pp. 331-359). New York: Routledge.
- Nam, J., Kwak, K., Jang, K., & Hand, B. (2008). The implementation of argumentation using Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) in Middle School Science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 28(8), 922-936.
- National Education Association. (2014). Preparing 21st century students for a global society: An educators guide to the "Four Cs." Washington, DC: National Education Association.
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states: Vol. 1. The standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Prain, V. (2006). Learning from writing in secondary science: Some theoretical and practical implications. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2-3), 179-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500336643
- Richter, T., & Schmid, S. (2010). Epistemological beliefs and epistemic strategies in self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 5(1), 47-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-009-9038-4
- Richter, T. (2015). Validation and comprehension of text information: Two sides of the same coin. Discourse Processes, 52(5-6), 337-355. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2015.1025665
- Sampson, V., & Clark, D. B. (2008). Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions. Science Education, 92(3), 447-472. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20276
- Sandoval, W. A., & Millwood, K. A. (2005). The quality of students' use of evidence in written scientific explanations. Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), 23-55. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2301_2
- Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational psychology review, 7(4), 351-371. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212307
- Schraw, G., & Robinson, D. H. (2011). Conceptualizing and assessing higher order thinking skills. In G. Schraw & D. Robinson (Eds.), Assessment of higher order thinking skills (pp.1-15). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishers.
- Swartz, R. J., Costa, A. L., Beyer, B. K., Reagan, R., & Kallick, B. (2010). Thinking-Based Learning: Promoting Quality Student Achievement in the 21st Century. New York: Teachers College Press.
Cited by
- 논의기반 탐구활동이 초등학생의 과학 글쓰기에 나타나는 주장과 증거에 미치는 영향 vol.64, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2020.64.6.389
- 지구과학 예비교사가 설계한 수업내용의 논증구조에 나타난 반박 분석 vol.13, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.15523/jksese.2020.13.3.238
- 2015개정 과학과 선택과목 수업 및 평가에 대한 교사들의 인식 탐색 vol.41, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2021.41.3.183
- 예비 지구과학 교사의 교수학습지도안에 나타난 논증 수준 분석 vol.14, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.15523/jksese.2021.14.2.123