DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Laboratory-Scale Study of the Applicability of a Halophilic Sediment Bioelectrochemical System for in situ Reclamation of Water and Sediment in Brackish Aquaculture Ponds: Establishment, Bacterial Community and Performance Evaluation

  • Pham, Hai The (Research group for Physiology and Applications of Microorganisms (PHAM group), GREENLAB, Center for Life Science Research (CELIFE) and Department of Microbiology - Faculty of Biology, Vietnam National University - University of Science) ;
  • Tran, Hien Thi (Research group for Physiology and Applications of Microorganisms (PHAM group), GREENLAB, Center for Life Science Research (CELIFE) and Department of Microbiology - Faculty of Biology, Vietnam National University - University of Science) ;
  • Vu, Linh Thuy (Research group for Physiology and Applications of Microorganisms (PHAM group), GREENLAB, Center for Life Science Research (CELIFE) and Department of Microbiology - Faculty of Biology, Vietnam National University - University of Science) ;
  • Dang, Hien The (Research group for Physiology and Applications of Microorganisms (PHAM group), GREENLAB, Center for Life Science Research (CELIFE) and Department of Microbiology - Faculty of Biology, Vietnam National University - University of Science) ;
  • Nguyen, Thuy Thu Thi (Research group for Physiology and Applications of Microorganisms (PHAM group), GREENLAB, Center for Life Science Research (CELIFE) and Department of Microbiology - Faculty of Biology, Vietnam National University - University of Science) ;
  • Dang, Thu Ha Thi (Research group for Physiology and Applications of Microorganisms (PHAM group), GREENLAB, Center for Life Science Research (CELIFE) and Department of Microbiology - Faculty of Biology, Vietnam National University - University of Science) ;
  • Nguyen, Mai Thanh Thi (Center for Experimental Biology, National Center for Technological Progress (NACENTECH)) ;
  • Nguyen, Huy Quang (Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biology, Vietnam National University in Hanoi - University of Science) ;
  • Kim, Byung Hong (Korea Institute of Science and Technology)
  • Received : 2019.05.20
  • Accepted : 2019.06.17
  • Published : 2019.07.28

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the potential of using sediment bioelectrochemical systems (SBESs) for in situ treatment of the water and sediment in brackish aquaculture ponds polluted with uneaten feed. An SBES integrated into a laboratory-scale tank simulating a brackish aquaculture pond was established. This test tank and the control (not containing the SBES) were fed with shrimp feed in a scheme that mimics a situation where 50% of feed is uneaten. After the SBES was inoculated with microbial sources from actual shrimp pond sediments, electricity generation was well observed from the first experimental week, indicating successful enrichment of electrochemically active bacteria in the test tank sediment. The electricity generation became steady after 3 weeks of operation, with an average current density of $2.3mA/m^2$ anode surface and an average power density of $0.05mW/m^2$ anode surface. The SBES removed 20-30% more COD of the tank water, compared to the control. After 1 year, the SBES also reduced the amount of sediment in the tank by 40% and thus could remove approximately 40% more COD and approximately 52% more nitrogen from the sediment, compared to the control. Insignificant amounts of nitrite and nitrate were detected, suggesting complete removal of nitrogen by the system. PCR-DGGE-based analyses revealed the dominant presence of Methylophilus rhizosphaerae, Desulfatitalea tepidiphila and Thiothrix eikelboomii, which have not been found in bioelectrochemical systems before, in the bacterial community in the sediment of the SBES-containing tank. The results of this research demonstrate the potential application of SBESs in helping to reduce water pollution threats, fish and shrimp disease risks, and thus farmers' losses.

Keywords

References

  1. Sajana TK, Ghangrekar MM, Mitra A. 2013. Application of sediment microbial fuel cell for in situ reclamation of aquaculture pond water quality. Aquac. Eng. 57: 101-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2013.09.002
  2. Official website of the Directorate of Fisheries - Vietnam Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development: https://tongcucthuysan.gov.vn.
  3. Boyd CE. 1998. Pond water aeration systems. Aquac. Eng. 18: 9-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8609(98)00019-3
  4. van Rijn J. 1996. The potential for integrated biological treatment systems in recirculating fish culture-a review. Aquac. 139: 181-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(95)01151-X
  5. Lin Y-F, Jing S-R, Lee D-Y, Wang T-W. 2002. Nutrient removal from aquaculture wastewater using a constructed wetlands system. Aquac. 209: 169-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00801-8
  6. Zou S, Guan L, Taylor DP, Kuhn D, He Z. 2018. Nitrogen removal from water of recirculating aquaculture system by a microbial fuel cell. Aquac. 497: 74-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.07.036
  7. Marx Sander E, Virdis B, Freguia S. 2018. Bioelectrochemical denitrification for the treatment of saltwater recirculating aquaculture streams. ACS Omega 3: 4252-4261. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b00287
  8. Reimers CE, Tender LM, Fertig S, Wang W. 2001. Harvesting energy from the marine sediment-water interface. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35: 192-195. https://doi.org/10.1021/es001223s
  9. Jang JK, Pham TH, Chang IS, Kang KH, Moon H, Cho KS, et al. 2004. Construction and operation of a novel mediator- and membrane-less microbial fuel cell. Process Biochem. 39: 1007-1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(03)00203-6
  10. Bond DR, Holmes DE, Tender LM, Lovley DR. 2002. Electrode-reducing microorganisms that harvest energy from marine sediments. Science 295: 483-485. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1066771
  11. Hong S, Choi Y, Chung T, Song J, Kim H. 2009. Assessment of sediment remediation potential using microbial fuel cell technology. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. 54: 683-689.
  12. Morris JM, Jin S. 2012. Enhanced biodegradation of hydrocarbon-contaminated sediments using microbial fuel cells. J. Hazard. Mater. 213: 474-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.02.029
  13. Sherafatmand M, Ng HY. 2015. Using sediment microbial fuel cells (SMFCs) for bioremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Bioresour. Technol. 195: 122-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.06.002
  14. An J, Kim B, Nam J, Ng HY, Chang IS. 2013. Comparison in performance of sediment microbial fuel cells according to depth of embedded anode. Bioresour. Technol. 127: 138-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.09.095
  15. Ewing T, Ha PT, Babauta JT, Tang NT, Heo D, Beyenal H. 2014. Scale-up of sediment microbial fuel cells. J. Power Sources 272: 311-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.08.070
  16. De Schamphelaire L, Rabaey K, Boeckx P, Boon N, Verstraete W. 2008. Outlook for benefits of sediment microbial fuel cells with two bio-electrodes. Microbial Biotechnol. 1: 446-462. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-7915.2008.00042.x
  17. Donovan C, Dewan A, Heo D, Beyenal H. 2008. Batteryless, wireless sensor powered by a sediment microbial fuel cell. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42: 8591-8596. https://doi.org/10.1021/es801763g
  18. Scott K, Cotlarciuc I, Head I, Katuri KP, Hall D, Lakeman JB, et al. 2008. Fuel cell power generation from marine sediments: Investigation of cathode materials. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 83: 1244-1254. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.1937
  19. Tender LM, Reimers CE, Stecher HA, Holmes DE, Bond DR, Lowy DA, et al. 2002. Harnessing microbially generated power on the seafloor. Nat. Biotechnol. 20: 821-825. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt716
  20. Bui TQ. 2010. Standard protocols of rearing shrimps following good aquaculture practice (GAP) (in Vietnamese), pp. 1-17. Ed. Research Institute of Aquaculture No. 1, Bac Ninh, Vietnam.
  21. Tacon AGJ, Phillips MJ, Barg UC. 1995. Aquaculture feeds and the environment: The asian experience. Water Sci. Technol. 31: 41-59.
  22. Hasan M. 2000. Presented at the Aquaculture in the third millennium. Technical proceedings of the conference on aquaculture in the third millennium, Bangkok, Thailand.
  23. Aelterman P, Rabaey K, Pham HT, Boon N, Verstraete W. 2006. Continuous electricity generation at high voltages and currents using stacked microbial fuel cells. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40: 3388-3394. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0525511
  24. Logan BE, Hamelers B, Rozendal R, Schrorder U, Keller J, Freguia S, et al. 2006. Microbial fuel cells: Methodology and technology. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40: 5181-5192. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0605016
  25. Srinivasan V, Weinrich J, Butler C. 2016. Nitrite accumulation in a denitrifying biocathode microbial fuel cell. Environ. Sci: Water Res. Technol. 2: 344-352. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5EW00260E
  26. Nguyen TT, Luong TTT, Tran PHN, Bui HTV, Nguyen HQ, Dinh HT, et al. 2015. A lithotrophic microbial fuel cell operated with pseudomonads-dominated iron-oxidizing bacteria enriched at the anode. Microbial Biotechnol. 8: 579-589. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12267
  27. Boon N, Goris J, De Vos P, Verstraete W, Top EM. 2000. Bioaugmentation of activated sludge by an indigenous 3-chloroaniline-degrading Comamonas testosteroni strain, I2gfp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66: 2906-2913. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.7.2906-2913.2000
  28. Muyzer G, de Waal EC, Uitterlinden A. 1993. Profiling of complex microbial populations using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59: 695-700. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.59.3.695-700.1993
  29. Muyzer G, Teske A, Wirsen CO, Jannasch HW. 1995. Phylogenetic relationships of Thiomicrospira species and their identification in deep-sea hydrothermal vent samples by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of 16S rDNA fragments. Arch. Microbiol. 164: 165-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02529967
  30. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215: 403-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2
  31. Greenberg A, Clesceri LS, Eaton AD. 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th Edn, pp. 5-16 - 5-19. Ed. American Public Health Association, Washington DC
  32. Vyrides I, Stuckey D. 2009. A modified method for the determination of chemical oxygen demand (COD) for samples with high salinity and low organics. Bioresour. Technol. 100: 979-982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.06.038
  33. Shantaram A, Beyenal H, Raajan R, Veluchamy A, Lewandowski Z. 2005. Wireless sensors powered by microbial fuel cells. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39: 5037-5042. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0480668
  34. Zhang Y, Angelidaki I. 2012. Bioelectrode-based approach for enhancing nitrate and nitrite removal and electricity generation from eutrophic lakes. Water Res. 46: 6445-6453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.09.022
  35. Wang A, Cheng H, Ren N, Cui D, Lin N, Wu W. 2012. Sediment microbial fuel cell with floating biocathode for organic removal and energy recovery. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 6: 569-574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-011-0335-1
  36. Cruz Viggi C, Presta E, Bellagamba M, Kaciulis S, Balijepalli S, Zanaroli G, et al. 2015. The "Oil-Spill Snorkel": an innovative bioelectrochemical approach to accelerate hydrocarbons biodegradation in marine sediments. Front. Microbiol. 6: 881. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00881
  37. Lovley DR. 2006. Bug juice: harvesting electricity with microorganisms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4: 497-508. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1442
  38. Hien TT, Linh VT, Hai PT. 2016. Bacteria isolated from the sediment of a bioelectrochemical system installed in a simulated aquaculture pond operated with brackish water. VNU J. Nat. Sci. Technol. 32: 233-241.
  39. Madhaiyan M, Poonguzhali S, Kwon S-W, Sa T-M. 2009. Methylophilus rhizosphaerae sp. nov., a restricted facultative methylotroph isolated from rice rhizosphere soil. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 59: 2904-2908. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.009811-0
  40. Howarth R, Unz RF, Seviour EM, Seviour RJ, Blackall LL, Pickup RW, et al. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships of filamentous sulfur bacteria (Thiothrix spp. and Eikelboom type 021N bacteria) isolated from wastewatertreatment plants and description of Thiothrix eikelboomii sp. nov., Thiothrix unzii sp. nov. , Thiothrix fructosivorans sp. nov. and Thiothrix defluvii sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 49: 1817-1827. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-49-4-1817
  41. Higashioka Y, Kojima H, Watanabe M, Fukui M. 2013. Desulfatitalea tepidiphila gen. nov., sp. nov., a sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from tidal flat sediment. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 63: 761-765. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.043356-0
  42. Widdel F, Bak F. 1992. Gram-Negative Mesophilic Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria, pp. 3352-3378. In Balows A, Trüper HG, Dworkin M, Harder W, Schleifer K-H (eds.), The Prokaryotes: A Handbook on the Biology of Bacteria: Ecophysiology, Isolation, Identification, Applications, Ed. Springer New York, New York, NY
  43. Verstraete W, Wittebolle L, Heylen K, Vanparys B, de Vos P, van de Wiele T, et al. 2007. Microbial resource management: the road to go for environmental biotechnology. Eng. Life Sci. 7: 117-126. https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.200620176
  44. Ryan MP, Pembroke JT. 2018. Brevundimonas spp: emerging global opportunistic pathogens. Virulence 9: 480-493. https://doi.org/10.1080/21505594.2017.1419116
  45. Pham TH, Rabaey K, Aelterman P, Clauwaert P, De Schamphelaire L, Boon N, et al. 2006. Microbial fuel cells in relation to conventional anaerobic digestion technology. Eng. Life Sci. 6: 285-292. https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.200620121
  46. Puig S, Serra M, Coma M, Balaguer M, Colprim J. 2011. Simultaneous domestic wastewater treatment and renewable energy production using microbial fuel cells (MFCs). Water Sci. Technol. 64: 904-909 https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2011.401
  47. Yoshie S, Makino H, Hirosawa H, Shirotani K, Tsuneda S, Hirata A. 2006. Molecular analysis of halophilic bacterial community for high-rate denitrification of saline industrial wastewater. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 182-189.
  48. Yoshie S, Noda N, Tsuneda S, Hirata A, Inamori Y. 2004. Salinity decreases nitrite reductase gene diversity in denitrifying bacteria of wastewater treatment systems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70: 3152-3157. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.5.3152-3157.2004
  49. Kits KD, Sedlacek CJ, Lebedeva EV, Han P, Bulaev A, Pjevac P, et al. 2017. Kinetic analysis of a complete nitrifier reveals an oligotrophic lifestyle. Nature 549: 269-272. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23679
  50. Koch H, van Kessel MA, Lucker S. 2019. Complete nitrification: insights into the ecophysiology of comammox Nitrospira. Appl Environ. Microbiol. 103: 177-189.
  51. Gajaraj S, Hu Z. 2014. Integration of microbial fuel cell techniques into activated sludge wastewater treatment processes to improve nitrogen removal and reduce sludge production. Chemosphere 117: 151-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.06.013
  52. Xiao B, Luo M, Wang X, Li Z, hen H, Liu J, et al. 2017. Electricity production and sludge reduction by integrating microbial fuel cells in anoxic-oxic process. Waste Manag. 69: 346-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.06.046
  53. Borea L, Puig S, Monclús H, Naddeo V, Colprim J, Belgiorno V. 2017. Microbial fuel cell technology as a downstream process of a membrane bioreactor for sludge reduction. Chem. Eng. J. 326: 222-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.05.137
  54. Boyd CE, Schmittou HR. 1999. Achievement of sustainable aquaculture through environmental management. Aquac. Economics Manag. 3: 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/13657309909380233
  55. Camargo JA, Alonso A. 2006. Ecological and toxicological effects of inorganic nitrogen pollution in aquatic ecosystems: a global assessment. Environ. Int. 32: 831-849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2006.05.002
  56. Wei J, Liang P, Huang X. 2011. Recent progress in electrodes for microbial fuel cells. Bioresour. Technol. 102: 9335-9344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.019

Cited by

  1. A Laboratory-Scale Study of the Applicability of a Halophilic Sediment Bioelectrochemical System for in situ Reclamation of Water and Sediment in Brackish Aquaculture Ponds: Effects of Operational Con vol.29, pp.10, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1906.06052
  2. Biological Reduction of Organic Matter in Buji River Sediment (Shenzhen, China) with Artificial Oxygenation vol.12, pp.12, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/w12123592
  3. Sediment microbiota in polyculture of shrimp and fish pattern is distinctive from those in monoculture intensive shrimp or fish ponds vol.787, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147594