Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology

The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology (한국미생물·생명공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Nano-Encapsulation of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria and Their Metabolites Using Alginate-Silica Nanoparticles and Carbon Nanotube Improves UCB1 Pistachio Micropropagation

  • Pour, Mojde Moradi (Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan) ;
  • Saberi-Riseh, Roohallah (Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan) ;
  • Mohammadinejad, Reza (NanoBioEletrochemistry Research Center, Bam University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Hosseini, Ahmad (Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan)
  • Received : 2019.03.12
  • Accepted : 2019.05.07
  • Published : 2019.07.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

UCB-1 is the commercial rootstock of pistachio. Reproduction of this rootstock by tissue culture is limited by low levels of proliferation rate. Therefore, any compound that improves the proliferation rate and the quality of the shoots can be used in the process of commercial reproduction of this rootstock. Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria is one of the best ideas. Given the beneficial effects of nanoparticles in enhancement of the growth in plant tissue cultures, the aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of nanoencapsulation of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (using silica nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes) and their metabolites in improving UCB1 pistachio micropropagation. The experiment was conducted in a completely randomized design with three replications. Before planting, treatments on the DKW medium were added. The results showed that the use of Pseudomonas fluorescens VUPF5 and Bacillus subtilis VRU1 nanocapsules significantly enhanced the root length and proliferation. The nanoformulation of the VUPF5 metabolite led to the highest root length (6.26 cm) and the largest shoot (3.34 cm). Inoculation of explants with the formulation of the metabolites (both bacterial strains) significantly elevated the average shoot length and the fresh weight of plant compared to the control. The explants were dried completely using both bacterial strains directly and with capsule coating after the three days.

Keywords

References

  1. Razavi SM, Emadzadeh B, Rafe A. Amini AM. 2007. The physical properties of pistachio nut and its kernel as a function of moisture content and variety: Part I. Geometrical properties. J. Food Eng. 81: 209-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.11.003
  2. Tilkat E, Suzerer V, Akdemir H, Ayaz Tilkat E, Ozden Ciftci Y, Onay A. 2013. A rapid and effective protocol for surface sterilization and in vitro culture initiation of adult male pistachio (Pistacia vera L. cv."Atli"). Academia J. Sci. Res. 1: 134-141.
  3. Morfeine EA. 2013. Effect of anti-browning on initiation phase of Musa species grand naine in vitro. Forest. Prod. J. 2: 45-47.
  4. Barghchi M. Alderson APG. 1983. In vitro Propagation of Pistachia vera L. from seedling tissues. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 58: 435-445. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221589.1983.11515140
  5. Vessey JK. 2003. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant Soil 255: 571-586. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026037216893
  6. Frommel MI, Nowak J. Lazarovits G. 1991. Growth enhancement and developmental modifications of in vitro grown potato (Solanum tuberosum spp. tuberosum) as affected by a nonfluorescent Pseudomonas sp. Plant Physiol. 96: 928-936. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.96.3.928
  7. del Carmen Jaizme-Vega M, Rodríguez-Romero AS, Guerra MSP. 2004. Potential use of rhizobacteria from the Bacillus genus to stimulate the plant growth of micropropagated bananas. Fruits 59: 83-90. https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits:2004008
  8. Glick BR, Penrose DM. Ma W. 2001. Bacterial promotion of plant growth. Biotechnol. Adv. 19: 135-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-9750(00)00065-3
  9. Nezami SR, Yadollahi A, Hokmabadi H. Eftekhari M. 2015. Control of shoot tip necrosis and plant death during in vitro multiplication of pistachio rootstock UCB1 (Pistacia integrima$\times$P. atlantica). J. Nuts. 6: 27-35.
  10. Ferguson L, Beede R, Reyes H. Seydi M. California pistachio rootstock trials; 1989-2001. California Pistachio Ind. Annu. Rep. 19-24.
  11. Mason G. Guttridge C. 1974. The role of calcium, boron and some divalent ions in leaf tipburn of strawberry. Sci. Hortic. 2: 299-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(74)90039-9
  12. Oloumia H, Ahmadi Mousavib E. Mohammadi Nejad R. 2018. Multi-wall carbon nanotubes effects on plant seedlings growth and cadmium/lead uptake in vitro. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 65: 260-268. https://doi.org/10.1134/S102144371802019X
  13. Ahmadi Z, Mohammadinejad Reza, Ashrafizadeh M. 2019. Drug delivery systems for resveratrol, a non-flavonoid polyphenol: Emerging evidence in las decades. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 51: 591-604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2019.03.017
  14. Moradi Pour M, Saberi-Riseh R, Mohammadinejad R, Hosseini A. 2019. Investigating the formulation of alginate-gelatin encapsulated Pseudomonas fluorescens (VUPF5 and T17-4 strains) for controlling Fusarium solani on potato. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 133: 603-613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.04.071
  15. Heydari HR. 2013. A study on application of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) as a plant growth regulator in Anthurium andreanum L. micropropagation, M. Sc. dissertation, faculty of agriculture, University of Tarbiat Modares. Iran. (In Farsi).
  16. Khodakovskaya M, Dervishi E, Mahmood M, Xu Y, Li Z, Watanabe F, Biris AS. 2009. Carbon nanotubes are able to penetrate plant seed coat and dramatically affect seed germination and plant growth. ACS Nano 3: 3221-3227. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn900887m
  17. Canas JE, Long M, Nations S, Vadan R, Dai L, Luo M, et al. 2008. Effects of functionalized and nonfunctionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes on root elongation of select crop species. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 27: 1922-1931. https://doi.org/10.1897/08-117.1
  18. Laane HM. 2018. The effects of foliar sprays with different silicon compounds. Plants 7: 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants7020045
  19. Ma JF, Yamaji N. 2006. Silicon uptake and accumulation in higher plants. Trends Plant Sci. 11: 392-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2006.06.007
  20. Deshmukh RK, Ma JF, Belanger RR. 2017. Role of silicon in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 8: 1858. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01858
  21. Ramirez R, Arias M, David J, Bedoya JC, Rueda L, Antoni E, et al. 2015. Metabolites produced by antagonistic microbes inhibit the principal avocado pathogens in vitro. Agron. Colomb. 33: 58-63. https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v33n1.48241
  22. Patten CL, Glick BR. 1996. Bacterial biosynthesis of indole-3-acetic acid. Can. J. Microbiol. 42: 207-220. https://doi.org/10.1139/m96-032
  23. Tu L, He Y, Yang H, Wu Z., Yi L. 2015. Preparation and characterization of alginate-gelatin microencapsulated Bacillus subtilis SL-13 by emulsification/internal gelation. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 26: 735-749. https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2015.1056075
  24. Mirza MS, Ahmad W, Latif F, Haurat J. Bally R, Normand P, et al. 2001. Isolation, partial characterization, and the effect of plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) on micro-propagated sugarcane in vitro. Plant Soil 237: 47-54. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013388619231
  25. Beneduzi A, Ambrosini A, Passaglia LM. 2012. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): their potential as antagonists and biocontrol agents. Int. J. Genet Mol. Biol. 35: 1044-1051. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47572012000600020
  26. Vestberg M, Kukkonen S, Saari K, Parikka P, Huttunen J, Tainio L, et al. 2004. Microbial inoculation for improving the growth and health of micropropagated strawberry. Appl. Soil Ecol. 27: 243-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2004.05.006
  27. Nowak J. Shulaev V. 2003. Priming for transplant stress resistance in in vitro propagation. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 39: 107-124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11626-003-0001-4
  28. Larraburu EE, Carletti SM, Caceres EAR. Llorente BE. 2007. Micropropagation of photinia employing rhizobacteria to promote root development. Plant Cell Rep. 26: 711-717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-006-0279-2
  29. Jackson P, Jacobsen NR. Baun A, Birkedal R, Kuhnel D. Jensen KA, et al. 2013. Bioaccumulation and ecotoxicity of carbon nanotubes. Chem. Cent. J. 7: 154. https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-153X-7-154
  30. Mondal A, Basu R, Das S. Nandy P. 2011. Beneficial role of carbon nanotubes on mustard plant growth: an agricultural prospect. J. Nanopart. Res. 13: 4519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-011-0406-z
  31. Casey A, Farrell GF, McNamara M, Byrne HJ, Chambers G. 2005. Interaction of carbon nanotubes with sugar complexes. Synth. Met. 153: 357-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synthmet.2005.07.298
  32. Khodakovskaya MV, de Silva K, Nedosekin DA, Dervishi E, Biris AS, Shashkov EV, et al. 2011. Complex genetic, photothermal, and photoacoustic analysis of nanoparticle-plant interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108: 1028-1033. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1008856108
  33. Liu Q, Chen B, Wang Q, Shi X, Xiao Z, Lin J, Fang X. 2009. Carbon nanotubes as molecular transporters for walled plant cells. Nano Lett. 9: 1007-1010. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl803083u
  34. Oloumi H, Mousavi E. Mohammadinejad R. 2014. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes enhance $Cd^{2+}$ and $Pb^{2+}$ uptake by canola seedlings. Agrochimica 58: 91-102.
  35. Kaya C, Tuna L. Higgs D. 2006. Effect of silicon on plant growth and mineral nutrition of maize grown under water-stress conditions. J. Plant Nutr. 29: 1469-1480. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904160600837238
  36. Silva O, Lobato A, Avila F, Costa R, Oliveira Neto C, Santos Filho B, et al. 2012. Silicon-induced increase in chlorophyll is modulated by the leaf water potential in two water-deficient tomato cultivars. Plant Soil Environ. 58: 481-486. https://doi.org/10.17221/213/2012-PSE
  37. Samuels A, Glass A, Ehret D, Menzies J. 1993. The effects of silicon supplementation on cucumber fruit: changes in surface characteristics. Ann. Bot. 72: 433-440. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1993.1129
  38. Bao-shan L, Chun-hui L, Li-jun F, Shu-chun Q, Min Y. 2004. Effect of TMS (nanostructured silicon dioxide) on growth of Changbai larch seedlings. J. For. Res. 15: 138-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02856749
  39. Agarie S, Agata W, Uchida H, Kubota F, Kaufman PB. 1996. Function of silica bodies in the epidermal system of rice (Oryza sativa L.): testing the window hypothesis. J. Exp. Bot. 47: 655-660. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/47.5.655
  40. Silva ON, Lobato AKS, Avila FW, Costa RCL, Oliveira Neto CF, Santos Filho BG, et al. 2012. Silicon-induced increase in chlorophyll is modulated by the leaf water potential in two water-deficient tomato cultivars. Plant Soil Environ. 58: 481-486. https://doi.org/10.17221/213/2012-PSE
  41. Al-aghabary K, Zhu Z. Shi Q. 2005. Influence of silicon supply on chlorophyll content, chlorophyll fluorescence, and antioxidative enzyme activities in tomato plants under salt stress. J. Plant Nutr. 27: 2101-2115. https://doi.org/10.1081/PLN-200034641
  42. Kermani SA, Hokmabadi H. Jahromi MG. 2017. The evaluation of the effect of multiwall carbon nano tube (MWCNT) on in vitro proliferation and shoot tip necrosis of pistachio rootstock UCB-1 (Pistacia integrima$\times$P. atlantica). J. Nuts 8: 49-59.

Cited by

  1. Towards Better Understanding of the Interactions and Efficient Application of Plant Beneficial Prebiotics, Probiotics, Postbiotics and Synbiotics vol.11, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.01068
  2. Curcumin Delivery Mediated by Bio-Based Nanoparticles: A Review vol.25, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25030689
  3. Multifunctional Polymeric Nanoplatforms for Brain Diseases Diagnosis, Therapy and Theranostics vol.8, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines8010013
  4. Effect of silver nanoparticles and Bacillus cereus LPR2 on the growth of Zea mays vol.10, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77460-w
  5. Potential Role and Utilization of Plant Growth Promoting Microbes in Plant Tissue Culture vol.12, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.649878
  6. Differentially expressed genes in resistant and susceptible Pistacia vera L. Cultivars in response to Pseudomonas fluorescens and Phytophthora parsiana vol.31, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2020.1867706
  7. Biopolymers for Biological Control of Plant Pathogens: Advances in Microencapsulation of Beneficial Microorganisms vol.13, pp.12, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13121938
  8. A novel encapsulation of Streptomyces fulvissimus Uts22 by spray drying and its biocontrol efficiency against Gaeumannomyces graminis, the causal agent of take‐all disease in wheat vol.77, pp.10, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.6469
  9. Encapsulation of Plant Biocontrol Bacteria with Alginate as a Main Polymer Material vol.22, pp.20, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222011165
  10. Evaluation of Bacillus velezensis for Biological Control of Rhizoctonia solani in Bean by Alginate/Gelatin Encapsulation Supplemented with Nanoparticles vol.31, pp.10, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2105.05001
  11. Salinity Stress: Toward Sustainable Plant Strategies and Using Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Encapsulation for Reducing It vol.13, pp.22, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212758