Journal of Technology Innovation (기술혁신연구)

Korea Society for Innovation Managemetn & Economics (기술경영경제학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effects of R&D institutions and cooperation types on R&D efficiency in the components and materials industry

연구개발 수행기관 및 협력유형이 소재부품 R&D 효율성에 미치는 영향

  • 천동필 (부경대학교 기술경영전문대학원) ;
  • 우청원 (과학기술정책연구원) ;
  • 조용곤 (한국산업기술평가관리원) ;
  • 한명훈 (강원대학교 산학협력단(경영회계학부))
  • Received : 2019.03.29
  • Accepted : 2019.08.07
  • Published : 2019.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The Korean economy has undergone growth based on manufacturing end products. The Korean government aims to advance industry by strengthening the materials and components industry, which is attracting more attention in terms of maintaining the competitiveness of existing key industries, and fostering new industries required in the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Despite this importance, there is insufficient related research on the efficient R&D of the materials and components industry. This study analyzed the R&D efficiency. In addition, exploratory research was conducted on the impact of corporate size and type of cooperation on R&D efficiency. Output variables were set to reflect economic performance and the empirical analysis revealed that overall R&D efficiency is low. Small firms were found to perform better than large firms in terms of firm-size, and the efficiency of business-university-research cooperation is worse than other types of cooperation. This study is exploratory research considering the materials and components industry, and the results provide implications for research institutions and regarding types of cooperation. This is expected to help develop polices for qualitative growth and R&D strategies for investment and allocation.

완제품 제조업 중심의 성장을 진행한 한국경제는 소재부품산업의 경쟁력 강화를 통한 산업고도화를 지향하고 있다. 소재부품산업은 기존 핵심산업의 경쟁력 유지 및 4차 산업혁명 시대에 요구되는 신산업의 육성 측면에서 더욱 주목받고 있다. 이러한 중요성에도 불구하고, 소재부품산업의 효율적인 R&D를 위한 연구가 매우 부족한 현황이다. 본 연구는 정부의 소재부품기술개발사업 성과 데이터를 기반으로 R&D 효율성 분석과 이에 기업규모와 협력유형이 미치는 영향에 대하여 탐색적 연구를 진행하였다. 분석결과, 전반적으로 R&D 효율성은 낮은 것으로 나타났으나, 이는 경제적 성과가 반영된 산출변수 설정에 기인한 결과로 판단한다. 중소기업이 주관기관일 경우가 대기업보다 규모 성과가 우수한 것으로 나타났으며, 산학연이 협력할 경우가 그렇지 않은 경우와 비교하여 성과가 저조한 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구의 결과는 연구개발 수행기관 및 협력유형에 따른 R&D 성과 창출에 대한 시사점을 제시하였다. 이는 국내 소재부품산업이 당면한 질적 성장을 위한 산업정책 기획, R&D 투자 및 배분 전략 수립에 도움을 줄 것으로 기대한다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김기봉.정혜경 (2018), "정부의 에너지전환 정책에 따른 전력 분야 R&D 투자 방향", KISTEP Issue Weekly, 2018-10.
  2. 김선경.이길우.안헤린.방은진 (2016), "2015년 국가 R&D 성과 Scoreboard 구축을 위한 연구", 한국과학기술기획평가원.
  3. 김영훈.김선근 (2011), "우리나라의 R&D 생산성 및 효율성 분석 : OECD 국가와의 비교를 중심으로", 기술혁신연구, 19(1), 1-27.
  4. 김주경.김영곤.강제상 (2014), "정부 R&D 사업성과의 영향요인에 관한 연구", 한국정책과학학회보, 18(4), 229-256.
  5. 김종대.조영석.박송춘 (2014), "부트스트랩 DEA 기법을 이용한 지역신협의 경영 효율성 분석", 금융공학연구, 13(1), 101-127.
  6. 김태희.김인호.안성봉.이계석 (2009), "자료포락분석법을 활용한 국가연구개발사업의 효율성 분석-원자력연구개발사업을 중심으로", 기술혁신학회지, 12(1), 70-87.
  7. 박만희 (2008), "효율성과 생산성 분석", 한국학술정보.
  8. 박석종.김경화.정상기 (2010), "과학기술적 성과 관점에서 정부 R&D 사업 효율성 분석에 관한 연구", 한국기술혁신학회 학술대회, 120-130.
  9. 박선후 (2018), "한국 자동차부품산업의 경쟁력분석과 대응방안", IBK 경제연구소.
  10. 박성민 (2014), "실증사례연구: 국가연구개발사업 성과의 주관기관 유형별 비교", 대한경영학회지, 27(7), 997-1012.
  11. 박웅.박호영.염명배 (2017), "ICT 중소기업의 산.연 R&D 협력이 기술혁신성과에 미치는 영향", 벤처창업연구, 12(6), 139-150. https://doi.org/10.16972/APJBVE.12.6.201712.139
  12. 변상규.한정희 (2009), "Efficiency Estimations for the government driven R&D projects in IT industries", 과학기술법연구, 15(2), 179-206. https://doi.org/10.32430/ilst.2009.15.2.179
  13. 산업통상자원부 (2016), "제4차 소재.부품발전 기본계획".
  14. 신근순 (2018), "소재부품 산업의 현황과 발전방향", 신소재경제, URL : http://www.amenews.kr/m/view.php?idx=36437
  15. 신중경 (2008), "부품.소재산업의 현황과 정책방향", 기은연구, 가을호, 28-48.
  16. 양은연 (2019), "전기차 시대, 배터리 산업 경쟁력 강화를 위한 정책 과제", KERI Brief, 19(1).
  17. 원동진 (2011), "부품.소재산업의 위상", 과학과 기술, 3월호, 52-59.
  18. 장금영 (2010), "연구개발투자의 성과에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구: 정부의 산업기술개발사업을 중심으로", 기술혁신연구, 18(1), 75-98.
  19. 조정래.김태윤 (2017), "공기업 주관 R&D 효율성의 특성 분석", 규제연구, 26(2), 147-187.
  20. 추정엽 (2008), "부품소재기업의 연구개발투자와 비용효율성의 관련성에 관한 실증연구", 산업경제연구, 21(6), 2413-2431.
  21. 한국산업기술평가관리원 (2018), "2017년 산업기술수준조사".
  22. 현대경제연구원 (2013), "한국 소재 산업의 국제경쟁력 변화와 시사점", 통권 513호.
  23. Appiah-Adu, K., & Singh, S. (1998), "Customer orientation and performance: a study of SMEs", Management decision, 36(6), 385-394. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749810223592
  24. Baker, R. and S. Talluri. (1997), "A closer look at the use of data envelopment analysis for technology selection", Computers & Industrial Engineering, 32(1), 101-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-8352(96)00199-4
  25. Becker, W. and Dietz, J. (2004). "R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms-evidence for the German manufacturing industry", Research policy, 33(2), 209-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2003.07.003
  26. Belderbos, R., Carree, M., & Lokshin, B. (2004). "Cooperative R&D and firm performance", Research policy, 33(10), 1477-1492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.003
  27. Bessant, J. and Tidd, J. (2007). "Innovation and entrepreneurship", John Wiley & Sons.
  28. Bizan, O. (2003), "The determinants of success of R&D projects: evidence from American-Israeli research alliances", Research Policy, 32(9), 1619-1640. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00044-1
  29. Branstetter, L. and Sakakibara, M. (1998). "Japanese research consortia: a microeconometric analysis of industrial policy", The Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(2), 207-233. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6451.00069
  30. Buisseret, T. J., Cameron, H. M., and Georghiou, L. (1995). "What difference does it make? Additionality in the public support of R&D in large firms", International Journal of Technology Management, 10(4-6), 587-600.
  31. Chun, D., Chung, Y., Woo, C., Seo, H., and Ko, H. (2015), "Labor union effects on innovation and commercialization productivity: An integrated propensity score matching and two-stage data envelopment analysis", Sustainability, 7(5), 5120-5138. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7055120
  32. Dosi, G. (1988). "Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation", Journal of economic literature, 1120-1171.
  33. Dvir, D. and Lechler, T. (2004), "Plans are nothing, changing plans is everything: the impact of changes on project success", Research policy, 33(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2003.04.001
  34. Fiegenbaum, A. and Karnani, A. (1991). "Output flexibility-a competitive advantage for small firms", Strategic management journal, 12(2), 101-114. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120203
  35. Fisher, F. M., and Temin, P. (1973), "Returns to scale in research and development: What does the Schumpeterian hypothesis imply?", Journal of Political Economy, 81(1), 56-70. https://doi.org/10.1086/260006
  36. G. Eason, B. Noble, and I. N. Sneddon. (1955), "On certain integrals of Lipschitz-Hankel type involving products of Bessel functions," Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, A247, 529-551.
  37. Gonzalez, E., and Gascon, F. (2004), "Sources of productivity growth in the Spanish pharmaceutical industry (1994-2000)", Research Policy, 33(5), 735-745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2003.12.004
  38. Hollanders, H. and F. Celikel-Esser. (2007), "Measuring innovation efficiency", INNO-Metics Thematic Paper.
  39. Hsu, Fang-Ming, and Chao-Chih Hsueh. (2009), "Measuring relative efficiency of government-sponsored R&D projects: A three-stage approach", Evaluation and program planning, 32(2), 178-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2008.10.005
  40. Hudson, M., Smart, A., & Bourne, M. (2001), "Theory and practice in SME performance measurement systems", International journal of operations & production management, 21(8), 1096-1115. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005587
  41. Kang, K. H., & Kang, J. (2010), "Does partner type matter in R&D collaboration for product innovation?", Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22(8), 945-959. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2010.520473
  42. Lee, H., Y. Park, and H. Choi, (2009), "Comparative evaluation of performance of national R&D programs with heterogeneous objectives: A DEA approach", European Journal of Operational Research, 196(3), 847-855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.06.016
  43. Leeuw, T., Lokshin, B., & Duysters, G. (2014), "Returns to alliance portfolio diversity: The relative effects of partner diversity on firm's innovative performance and productivity", Journal of Business Research, 67(9), 1839-1849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.12.005
  44. Link, A. N., and Bauer, L. L. (1989), "Cooperative research in US manufacturing: Assessing policy initiatives and corporate strategies", Free Press.
  45. Mansfield, Edwin. (1981), "Composition of R&D Expenditures: Relationship to Size of Firm, Concentration, and Innovative Output", The Review of Economics and Statistics, 63, 610-615. https://doi.org/10.2307/1935857
  46. Okamuro, H. (2007), "Determinants of successful R&D cooperation in Japanese small businesses: The impact of organizational and contractual characteristics", Research Policy, 36(10), 1529-1544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.12.008
  47. Shin, K., Kim, S. J., & Park, G. (2016), "How does the partner type in R&D alliances impact technological innovation performance? A study on the Korean biotechnology industry", Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(1), 141-164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-015-9439-7
  48. Sueyoshi, T., and Aoki, S. (2001), "A use of a nonparametric statistic for DEA frontier shift: the Kruskal and Wallis rank test", Omega, 29(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(00)00024-4
  49. Tether, B. S. (2002), "Who co-operates for innovation, and why: an empirical analysis", Research policy, 31(6), 947-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00172-X
  50. Van Beers, C., Berghall, E., & Poot, T. (2008), "R&D internationalization, R&D collaboration and public knowledge institutions in small economies: Evidence from Finland and the Netherlands", Research Policy, 37(2), 294-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.10.007
  51. Van Beers, Cees, and Fardad Zand. (2014), "R&D cooperation, partner diversity, and innovation performance: an empirical analysis", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 292-312. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12096
  52. Vossen, R. W., and Nooteboom, B. (1996), "Firm size and participation in R&D. In Determinants of Innovation", Palgrave Macmillan, London, 155-168.
  53. Wanke, P. F. (2013), "Physical infrastructure and flight consolidation efficiency drivers in Brazilian airports: A two-stage network-DEA approach", Journal of Air Transport Management, 31, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2012.09.001
  54. Zhong, W., Yuan, W., Li, S. X., and Huang, Z. (2011), "The performance evaluation of regional R&D investments in China: An application of DEA based on the first official China economic census data", Omega, 39(4), 447-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2010.09.004
  55. Zhu, J. (2014), "Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking: data envelopment analysis with spreadsheets", Springer, New York.