Journal of Technology Innovation (기술혁신연구)

Korea Society for Innovation Managemetn & Economics (기술경영경제학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The relationship between Scientific Research and Technological innovation in the Semiconductor Industry : 1997~2017

과학연구가 기술혁신에 미치는 영향 분석: - 반도체 산업(1997~2017)을 중심으로 -

  • 김영삼 (성균관대학교 기술경영학과) ;
  • 조근태 (성균관대학교 시스템경영공학과/기술경영전문대학원)
  • Received : 2019.08.21
  • Accepted : 2019.11.01
  • Published : 2019.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study analyzes the improvement of absorptive capacity by basic research and the mediating effect of applied research to the innovations in the semiconductor industry. With 103 firms in the last 20 years tested firstly, applied research gives a more significant effect than basic research on the innovations. Secondly applied research functions as complete mediating effect between basic research and technological innovations. We also confirms high-performing firms are active in basic research to overcome technological hurdles. This paper suggests that basic research is needed as well as applied research. This study also implies strategic partnership and joint research with universities which have more suitable environment for basic research are needed in a long-term.

본 연구에서는 반도체 산업에서 기초과학 연구를 통한 흡수역량 개선 및 혁신 기회 포착 향상으로 응용과학 연구가 기술혁신 성과창출에 매개효과를 갖는지 실증 분석하고자 하였다. 103개 반도체 기업들을 대상으로 분석한 결과 첫째, 응용과학 연구는 기초과학 보다 기술혁신 성과에 더 큰 영향을 미쳤다. 둘째, 응용과학 연구는 기초과학 연구와 기술혁신성과 간에 완전매개효과를 갖는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 고성과 기업은 기술한계 극복을 위해 기초과학 연구에 적극적으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 기술혁신 창출을 위해 응용과학 연구뿐만 아니라 기초과학 연구가 필요하며, 기업보다 기초과학 연구에 적합한 환경을 갖는 대학 연구소와의 전략적인 협력관계 구축 및 장기적 관점의 공동 연구의 활성화가 필요함을 제언한다.

Keywords

References

  1. 과학기술정책연구원 편집부 (2016), "통계로 보는 혁신유형별 기업성과(매출부문)", 과학기술정책, 26 (10), pp. 42-47.
  2. 김미선.연승민.김재수.이병희 (2015), "연구수행 주체에 따른 국가R&D 기술이전 성과 영향요인 분석", 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제15권 11호, pp. 559-570. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2015.15.11.559
  3. 김인자.오윤정.김연희 (2016), "연구개발(R&D)활동이 GDP에 미치는 영향 분석: 과학기술논문과 특허의 매개를 통하여", 기술혁신학회지, 제19권 3호, pp. 658-685.
  4. 김철회.이상돈 (2007) "산학협력성과와 대학의 역량요인의 관계에 관한 연구", 기술혁신학회지, 제10권 4호, pp. 629-653.
  5. 김치환.박현우 (2013), "대학의 기술이전 성과와 기술가치평가의 역할", 기술혁신학회지 , 제16권 3호, pp. 754-783.
  6. 박희준.오정석.이정훈.박종우 (2013), "기술혁신과 경영전략", 피어슨에듀케이션코리아.
  7. 송지현 (2018), "R&D 투자와 특허간의 시차효과 분석", Productivity Review, Vol.32, No.2, June 2018
  8. 신장섭.장성원 (2006), "삼성 반도체 세계 일등 비결의 해부", 삼성경제연구소.
  9. 심미랑.장태미.유계환 (2013), "기술혁신에 있어서 특허활용의 역할 및 법제도적 개선방안", 기술혁신학회지, 제16권 3호 pp.809-838.
  10. 이헌준.백철우.이정동(2014), "기업 R&D투자의시차효과분석", 기술혁신연구, Vol.22(1), pp.1-22. https://doi.org/10.14383/SIME.2014.22.1.001
  11. 정도범.정동덕(2013), "공공연구기관의 성과관리, 활용역량 및 활동이 기술이전 성과에 미치는 영향", 기술경영경제학회, Vol.21, pp.199-223.
  12. 정성철.윤문섭.장진규 (2004), "특허와 기술혁신 및 경제발전의 상관관계", 정책연구, 2004.12, pp.1-114.
  13. 정수관.강상목 (2012), "정부 R&D, 민간 R&D와 생산성의 인과관계 분석", 생산성논집, Vol.26(3), pp.107-137.
  14. 조남재 (2014), "기술기획과 로드매핑", 시그마프레스 .
  15. 중앙일보 (2018), https://news.joins.com/article/23234345
  16. Achilladelis, B., Schwarzkopf, A., and Cines, M. (1988), "The dynamics of technological innovation: The case of the chemical industry", Research Policy 19, pp. 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(90)90032-2
  17. Ali, M., Muhammad, A., and Park, Kichan (2011), "A spiral process model of technological innovation in a developing country: The case of Samsung", African Journal of Business Management Vol. 5, No.7, pp. 2874-2889.
  18. Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. (1986), "The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, And Statistical Considerations", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6): pp. 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  19. Brown, S., Eisenhardt, K. (1995), "Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions", Academy of Management Journal, 20: pp. 343-378.
  20. Chang, Pao-Long and Tsai, Chien-Tzu (2002), "Finding the niche position - competition strategy of Taiwan's IC design industry", Technovation 22 (2002), pp. 101-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(00)00093-6
  21. Choi, Changwoo and Park, Yongtae (2009), "Monitoring the organic structure of technology based on the patent development paths", Technological Forecasting & Social Change 76 (2009) pp. 754-768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.10.007
  22. Clark J., Soete L. (1982), "Unemployment and Technical Innovation", Greenwood Press, Westport. Connecticut
  23. Cockburn I., Henderson R.M., (1998), "Absorptive capacity, co-authoring behavior and the organization of research in drug discovery", Journal of Industrial Economics 46 (2), pp. 157-182. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6451.00067
  24. Cockburn I., Henderson R.M., (2000), "Publicly Funded Science and the Productivity of the Pharmaceutical Industry", Innovation Policy and the Economy Vol. 1 (2000), pp. 1-34.. https://doi.org/10.1086/ipe.1.25056140
  25. Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D. (1989), "Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D", Economic Journal 99, pp. 569-596. https://doi.org/10.2307/2233763
  26. Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D. (1990), "Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation", Administrative Science Quarterly 35, pp. 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  27. DRAMeXchange Data (2016), http://www.thescoop.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=19444
  28. Ernst, H. (1995), "Patenting Strategies in the German Mechanical Engineering Industry and Their Relationship to Firm Performance", Technovation, Vol.15 (4), pp. 225-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(95)96605-S
  29. Flatherty, M.T. (1984), "Field research on the link between technological innovation and growth: evidence from the international semiconductor industry", American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 74 (2), pp. 67-72.
  30. Gambardella, A. (1992) "Competitive advantage from in-house scientific research: the US pharmaceutical industry in the 1980s", Research Policy, 21 (5), pp. 391-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(92)90001-K
  31. Goda, A. (2013), "Recent Progress and Future Directions in NAND Flash Scaling", IEEE
  32. Greenhalgh, C., Rogers, M. (2010), "Innovation, Intellectual Property, and Economic growth, USA", Princeton University Press Princeton and Oxford
  33. Griliches, Z. (1990), "Patents Statistics as Economic Indicators: A survey", Journal of Economic Literature, Vol.28 (4), pp.1661-1707.
  34. Henderson, R. M., Clark, K. B. (1990), "Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration Of Existing", Administrative Science Quarterly: ABI/INFORM Global pp. 9
  35. Hall, B. H., Ziedonis, R. H. (2001), "The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the US semiconductor industry, 1980-1995", RAND Journal of Economics 32 (1), pp. 101-128. https://doi.org/10.2307/2696400
  36. Joo, Si and Lee, Keun (2009), "Samsung's catch-up with Sony: An analysis using US patent data", Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy.
  37. Kim, Linsu (1997), "The Dynamics of Samsung's Technological Learning in Semiconductors", California Management Review Vol. 39, No.3, pp. 86-100. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165900
  38. Kim, Woojae, Shi, Yongjiang, and Gregory M. (2004), "Transition from Imitation to Innovation: Lessons from a Korean Multinational Corporation", INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 9(4), pp. 329 - 346.
  39. Lim, Kwanghui (2004), "The relationship between research and innovation in the semiconductor and pharmaceutical industries (1981-1997)", Research Policy 33, pp. 287-321 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2003.08.001
  40. Lieberman, M. B., Montgomery, D. B. (1988), "First-Mover Advantages", Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 9, pp. 41-58. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250090706
  41. Ludwig, C. and Meyer, S. (2011), "Double Patterning for Memory ICs, Recent Advances in Nanofabrication Techniques and Applications", InTech
  42. Macher, J. T., Mowery, D.C., Hodges, D.A. (1999), "Semiconductors. In: Mowery, D. (Ed.), U.S. Industry in 2000: Studies in Competitive Performance", National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 245-286.
  43. Mansfield, E. (1981), "Composition of R&D expenditures: relationship to size of firm, concentration, and innovative output", Review of Economics and Statistics 63 (4), pp. 610-615. https://doi.org/10.2307/1935857
  44. Mansfield, E., Schwartz, M., Wagner, S. (1981), "Imitation costs and patents: an empirical study", The Economic Journal 91 (364), pp. 907-918. https://doi.org/10.2307/2232499
  45. MK (2019), https://www.mk.co.kr/news/economy/view/2019/07/540748/
  46. MK (2019), https://www.mk.co.kr/news/economy/view/2019/03/136778/
  47. Miller, J. D., Fern, J. M., and Cardinal B. L. (2007), "The use of knowledge for technological innovation within diversified firms", Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 308-326. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.24634437
  48. Moore, G.E., (1996), "Some personal perspectives on research in the semiconductor industry", Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
  49. National Science Foundation (2000), "Federal R&D Funding by Budget Function: Fiscal Years 1999-2001", Arlington, VA.
  50. Neamen, A. D. (2003), "Semiconductor Physics and Devices Basic Principles", McGraw Hill
  51. NIKKEI, (2016), http://asia.nikkei.com/Markets/Commodities/3D-NAND-flash-memory-chips-seeing-tough-competition?page=1
  52. NSC, (2000), Definitions of Research and Development: An Annotated Compilation of Official Sources: NSC.
  53. Pisano, G. (1997), "The Development Factory", Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
  54. Roger, H. F., Hoang, V. T. (2009), "Immersion Lithography: Photomask and Wafer-Level Materials", Annual Review of Materials Research
  55. Rosenberg, N., (1990), "Why do firms do basic research (with their own money)?", Research Policy 19, pp. 165-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(90)90046-9
  56. Romer, P. M., (1990), "Endogenous technological change", Journal of Political Economy 98 (5), pp. 71-102. https://doi.org/10.1086/261725
  57. SCIJOURNAL.ORG, https://scijournal.org/index.html
  58. Scotchmer, S. (1991), "Standing on the shoulder of giants: cumulative research and patent law", Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (1), pp. 29-41. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.1.29
  59. Stephan, P.E. (1996), "The economics of science", Journal of Economic Literature 34 (3), pp. 1199-1235.
  60. Stephan, P.E., Gurmu, S., Sumell A., Black G. (2007), "Who's patenting in the university? Evidence from the Survey of Doctorate Recipients", Economics of Innovation and New Technology . February 2007.
  61. Stokes, D. E., (1997),"Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation", Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
  62. Van Dalen, H. P., Henkens, K. (2001), "What makes a scientific article influential?", Scientometrics, 50 (3), pp. 455-482. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010510831718
  63. Wired (2008), https://www.wired.com/2008/08/bell-labs-kills/
  64. Wong, P. K., Singh, A. (2010), "University Patenting Activities and Their Link to the Quantity and Quality of Scientific Publications", Scientometrics, 83 (1), pp. 271-294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0003-4