DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Development and Application of Integrating Instruction with Evaluation Materials for Strengthening of Independent Living Competence: Focused on Technology and Home Economics Education

기술·가정과 생활자립역량 함양을 위한 교수학습-평가 연계 자료 개발 및 적용

  • Received : 2019.07.13
  • Accepted : 2019.09.26
  • Published : 2019.09.30

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to analyze the home economics education experts' and teachers' perception of ways to align instruction with evaluation, based on the 2015 revised technology and home economics curriculum for the purpose of developing the independent living competencies, and to provide examples of alignment in practice. The analysis is based on the data from a Delphi study (10 experts) and a survey of technology and home economics teachers(n=422). The results of survey indicated that experts and teachers perceived the instruction-assessment alignment to be most appropriate for project learning-project assessment, followed by project learning-portfolio assessment, problem solving learning-portfolio assessment, and problem solving learning-project assessment, in order. Based on the survey results, a model of instruction-assessment alignment and a teaching-learing plan were presented, based on 'Development task of life cycle and Life plan' unit. This was considered to be a proper method of instructional alignment for the purpose of developing 'independent living competence' with project-learning/project-assessment. The model focuses on consistency between instruction and evaluation, unity in methods, and the availablility of feedbacks of assessment for the improvement of independent living competencies. In conclusion, this study contributes as foundational information for teaching and learning-assessment alignment. Diverse methods of instruction-evaluation alignment is expected for future research.

본 연구의 목적은 2015 개정 실과(기술·가정) 교육과정에 제시된 생활자립역량을 기를 수 있는 교수학습-평가 연계 방안에 대한 가정교과 전문가와 교사들의 인식을 분석하고, 이 결과에 따라 교수학습-평가 설계안을 구상하고 이를 적용할 수 있는 사례를 제시하는 것에 있다. 연구를 통해 얻어진 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 가정교과 전문가 10명의 2차에 걸친 델파이조사와 가정과교사 422명의 설문조사에서 생활자립 역량 함양을 위한 교수학습-평가 연계 방식으로 프로젝트 학습-프로젝트 평가, 프로젝트 학습-포트폴리오 평가, 문제해결학습-포트폴리오 평가, 문제해결학습-프로젝트 평가 순으로 적합하다는 결론을 도출하였다. 둘째, 생활자립역량 함양할 수 있음을 보여주는 '생애주기별 발달 과업과 생애 설계' 단원을 중심으로 프로젝트 학습-프로젝트 평가 방법을 연계하여 교수학습-평가 과정 예시안 개발 및 적용한 수업설계안을 제시하였다. 이 연구는 교과 역량을 함양하기 위한 교수학습-평가 활동의 일관성, 방법의 통일성, 평가의 환류성에 초점을 둔 교수학습-평가 연계 방안의 적용 가능성을 확인한 것에 의의가 있다. 향후 교과역량별 교수학습-평가 연계 방안에 대한 다양한 방안에 대한 연구가 이루어질 필요가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Han, H.-C., Chang, K.-S., Kim, K.-C., & Lee, J.-Y. (2017). A study of organizing the elementary and middle school curriculum for cultivating key competencies of the 2015 revised curriculum. Report of Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation RRC 2017-2. Chungbuk: KICE.
  2. Jin, E.-N., Gwon, Y., Ryu, S.-H., Kim, E. J., Nam, S., & Yun, B. (2016). Research and development of assessment standards of Practical Arts(Technology⋅Home Economic) subject based on the 2015 revised national curriculum. Report of Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation CRC 2016-2-8. Seoul: KICE.
  3. Jin, E.-N., & Ryu, S.-H. (2016). Perception on key competencies in Practical Arts(Technology and Home Economics) of expert group. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 29(2), 61-75.
  4. Jin, E.-N, Yu, C., Jang, G., Lee, Y., Park, S., Yang, Y.,...Park, J. (2015). Action (implementation) plans of subject education for enhancing core competencies. Report of Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation RRC 2015-8. Seoul: KICE.
  5. Jin, K.-A., Lee, M.-J., Joung, Y., & Park, C. (2017). Exploring strategies for aligning instruction and assessment in high school math and english classes. Report of Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation RRI 2017-7. Chungbuk: KICE.
  6. Jung, H., Cho, J., Hong, M., & Park, J. H. (2016). A case study on policies and practices of school-based assessment in Korea based on UNESCO-NEQMAP's research framework. Report of Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation RRE 2016-6. Seoul: KICE.
  7. Kim, E. J. (2018). The development of instructional design for strengthening of the relationship formation competence through the lessons of housing area. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 30(1), 65-77. https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2018.03.30.1.65
  8. Kim, E. J., & Lee, Y.-J. (2017). A Study on pedagogical content knowledge(PCK) and teaching efficacy of prospective home economics teachers. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 29(1), 57-70. https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2017.03.29.1.57
  9. Kim, S. H. (2015). A study on implementation and improvement of classroom assessment. The Journal of Curriculum Evaluation, 18(3), 257-282. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2015.18.3.257
  10. Kim, S. (2018). Development of clothing life education to cultivate subject competencies based on 2015 revised Technology and Home Economics curriculum: Focusing on integration of the curriculum-class-evaluation. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 30(1), 115-128. https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2018.03.30.1.115
  11. Kim, S. M. (2018). Analyses of subject competencies of units dealing with core concept 'relation' of middle school Technology and Home Economics textbook in accordance with 2015 revised curriculum. Unpublished master's thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
  12. Kwon, J. R., Park, E. A., Kim, H.-K., Lee, Y., Kang, M.-K., Song, M.-Y.,...Seo, Y. (2016). Application plans of subject curriculums according to the 2015 revised curriculum: Focusing on elementary and middle-schools. Report of Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation RRC 2016-8-1. Chungbuk: KICE.
  13. Lee, G. S., Yoo, T., & Yang, J. S. (2018). Development of process-centered performance task for curriculum⋅ instruction⋅assessment alignment based on 2015 revised Home Economics curriculum. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 30(4), 165-185.
  14. Lee, K., Jeung, Y., Jeung, Y., Min, Y., Lee, K., Lee, J.,...Kim, S. (2015). Research for coordinating the revision process of subject curricular II. Report of Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation CRC 2015-25-1. Seoul: KICE.
  15. Lim, Y.-J., Choi., Y.-H., & Hong, Y.-J. (2016). A study on the instructional design invention unit of technology education in middle school based on understanding by design framework. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 29(2), 77-92.
  16. Lopez, N., Patrick, S., & Sturgis, C. (2017, October; 2018, May 29). Quality and Equity by Design: Charting the Course For the Next Phase of Competency-Based Education. iNACOL (the International Association for K-12 Online Learning), a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization based in Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://www.competencyworks.org/resources/briefing-papers/
  17. Ministry of Education (1997). The guideline of subject matter curriculum. Seoul: Ministry of Education.
  18. Ministry of Education (2015a). The general guideline on Elementary and Middle school curriculum. Proclamation Ministry of Education Notification #2015-74[separate volume 1]. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
  19. Ministry of Education (2015b). Practical Arts(Technology and Home Economic) education curriculum in the 2015 revised curriculum. Proclamation Ministry of Education Notification #2015-74[separate volume 10]. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
  20. Ministry of Education (2016). The general guide of 2015 revised curriculum: elementary school. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
  21. Park, S. H., Mun, Y. J., Jang, G., Lim, Y. J., & Han, K. (2018a). Methods of integrating instruction with evaluation for enhancement of subject competencies: Focusing on korean, history, mathematics, technology and home economics, and music. Report of Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation RRI 2018-5. Chungbuk: KICE.
  22. Park, S. H., Mun, Y. J., Jang, G., Lim, Y. J., & Han, K. (2018b). 교과 역량 함양을 위한 교수학습-평가 연계 교수학습 과정안 예시자료집: 중학교 국어, 역사, 수학, 기술.가정, 음악 교과를 중심으로. Report of Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation ORM 2018-126. Chungbuk: KICE.
  23. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
  24. So, K. (2015). Issues in the general guideline draft for the 2015 national curriculum: Remaining tasks for subject matter curriculum development. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(1), 195-214. https://doi.org/10.15708/kscs.33.1.201503.009
  25. Samsung & you premium (n.d.). What is work?. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xXH1XTmybMk

Cited by

  1. 과정 중심 평가를 위한 중학교 가정과 교수·학습과정안 개발: 생애설계 단원을 중심으로 vol.33, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2021.3.33.1.101