DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development and Evaluation of Home Economics Maker Education Program for High School Students: Focusing on the Contents of 'Hanbok and Creative Clothing'

고등학교 가정과 메이커 교육 프로그램 개발과 평가: '한복과 창의적인 의생활' 내용 요소를 중심으로

  • Received : 2019.10.23
  • Accepted : 2019.12.16
  • Published : 2019.12.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to suggest valuable maker education programs by implementing and evaluating a Home Economics(HE) maker education program developed based on the content of "Hanbok and Creative Clothing" for high school students. The results of this study are as follows. First, the HE maker education model for high school students was designed and developed. The HE maker education model was developed by integrating and modifying the TMSI model of the maker education model and Laster's HE practical action teaching model. The HE maker education model consisted of 4 steps: tinkering(T: 4-hour class), practical reasoning(P: 3-hour class), making together(M: 4-hour class), and sharing and spreading(S: 1-hour class) with a total of 12-hour lesson plans. The theme of the developed HE maker program is 'Practice and spread of creative traditional culture of life (Hanbok)'. Second, the results of online survey of 240 high school students who participated in this maker class showed that HE maker class had positive effects in the order of experiential(4.26), cognitive(4.22), emotional(4.18), social(4.18), and practical(4.10). It is expected that the findings of this study will contribute to diversifying the curriculum of Home Economics, thereby improving the quality of Home Economics Education.

본 연구의 목적은 고등학교 교육 현장 실정에 맞춘 가정과 메이커 교육 프로그램을 개발하고 연구자가 구축한 의생활 메이커스페이스에서 실행해 가정과 메이커 교육의 효과를 평가하는데 있다. 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 고등학교 가정과 메이커 교육 모형을 설계하고 가정과 메이커 교육 프로그램을 개발하였다. 가정과 메이커 교육 프로그램은 메이커 교육 모형인 TMSI 모형과 Laster(1982, 2008)의 실천적 행동 수업 모형을 통합·수정하여 개발한 TPMS모형{팅커링(T: 4차시), 실천적 추론하기(P: 3차시), 함께 만들기(M: 4차시), 공유·확산하기(S: 1차시)}으로 총 12차시를 개발하였다. 개발한 가정과 메이커 프로그램의 주제는 '창의적인 전통 의생활 문화(한복)의 실천과 확산'이다. 둘째, 가정과 메이커 교육 프로그램의 효과를 알아보기 위해 온라인 설문조사를 실시한 결과, 학생들은 가정과 메이커 수업이 5점 만점에서 체험적(4.26), 인지적(4.22), 감성적(4.18), 사회적(4.18), 실천적(4.10) 순으로 긍정적 효과가 있다고 인식하였다. 본 연구가 1차 교육과정 시기부터 만들기 활동을 통해 다양한 교육적 목적을 꾀해온 가정 교과의 실습 교육에 기여가 되기를 기대한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Blikstein, P., & Worsley, M. A. B. (2016). Children Are Not Hackers: Building a Culture of Powerful Ideas, Deep Learning, and Equity in the Maker Movement. In K. Peppler, E. Halverson, & Y. B. Kafai (Eds.), Makeology (1st ed., Vol. 1) (pp. 15-29). Routledge.
  2. Bowler, L., & Champagne, R. (2016). Mindful makers: Question prompts to help guide young peoples' critical technical practices in maker spaces in libraries, museums, and community-based youth organizations. Library & Information Science Research, 38(2), 117-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2016.04.006
  3. Brahms, L., & Crowley, K. (2016). Making sense of making: Defining learning practices in make magazine. In K. Peppler., E. Halverson., & Y. Kafai (Eds.), Makeology: Makers as learners (pp. 13-28). New York, NY: Routledge.
  4. Brown, M. M., & Paolucci, B. (1979). Home economics: A definition. Washington, DC: American Home Economics Association.
  5. Chae, J.-H., Yoo, T., Park, M. J., & Lee, J. Y. (2003). The effect of practical reasoning Home Economics instruction on morality of middle school students. Family and Environment Research, 41(12), 53-68.
  6. Clapp, E. P., Ross, J., Ryan, J. O., & Tishman, S. (2016). Maker-centered learning: Empowering young people to shape their worlds. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  7. Coleman, M. C. (2016). Design thinking and the school library. Knowledge Quest, 44(5), 62-68.
  8. Dougherty, D. (2012). The maker movement. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 7(3), 11-14. https://doi.org/10.1162/INOV_a_00135
  9. Dougherty, D. (2013). The maker mindset. In M. Honey & D. E. Kanter (Eds.), Design, make, play: growing the next generation of stem innovators (pp. 7-11). New York, NY: Routledge.
  10. Gong, S. M. (2018). Analysis of the lower grade's creativity and creative thinking process based on maker activities in elementary school. Unpublished master's thesis, Seoul National University of Education, Seoul, Korea.
  11. Ham, H.-I., Kim, K.-Y., & Kim, K.-S. (2016). Analysis of the effects of 3c-maker invention education program on middle school STEAM literacy. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 22(4), 103-119.
  12. Hwang, J. W., Kang, I., & Kim, H. S. (2016). Exploring the applicability of TMSI model as maker pedagogy: Focused on high school cases. Proceedings of 2016 KSET(Korean Society for Educational Technology) Conference (pp. 1-12). Seoul: The Korean Society for Educational Technology.
  13. Jeon, S. H. (2018). A study on development maker education program for software education. Unpublished master's thesis, Seoul National University of Education, Seoul, Korea.
  14. Jeon, Y. H., & Chung, H. M. (2019). Classification of course program types in maker education. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 9(9), 305-319. https://doi.org/10.35873/ajmahs.2019.9.9.027
  15. Jeong, H. M. (2018). Development of maker education program using museum. Unpublished master's thesis, Seoul National University of Education, Seoul, Korea.
  16. Kang, E. S. (2017). A study on the educational effects of the maker education outreach program: A case study focused on free semester activity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
  17. Kang, I. (2018). Maker education for learning environment to nurture DIY citizenship. Media & Education, 8(1), 6-22.
  18. Kang, I., & Kim, H. S. (2017). Exploring the value of the maker mind set at maker education. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 17(10), 250-267. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2017.17.10.250
  19. Kang, I., & Kim, M. K. (2017). Exploring Educational effects of maker activity in an elementary school class. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 17(14), 487-515. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2017.17.14.487
  20. Kang, I., & Yoon, H. J. (2017). Exploring the evaluation framework of maker education. International Journal of Contents, 17(11), 541-553.
  21. Kang, I., Yoon, H. J., Jung, D. A., & Kang, E. S. (2019). 메이커 교육의 이론과 실천 [Theory and practice of maker education]. Seoul: Naeha.
  22. Kapur, M. (2008). Productive failure. Cognition and Instruction, 26(3), 379-424. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000802212669
  23. Kim, K. J., & Lim, C. I. (2019). A developmental study of an instructional model for maker education using single-board computer(SBC) in elementary school. Journal of Educational Technology, 35(3), 687-728. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.35.3.687
  24. Kim, S.-B. (2019a). Clothing makerspace construction for home economics education. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 19(19), 1279-1309. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2019.19.19.1279
  25. Kim, S.-B. (2019b). Development and evaluation of life cycle violence prevention program for high school students. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 19(15), 987-1012. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2019.19.15.987
  26. Kim, S.-B. (2019c). Development and evaluation of home economics maker education program for high school students: focusing on the contents of 'hanbok and creative clothing'. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Korea National University of Education, Chung Buk, Korea.
  27. Kim, S.-B. (2019d). Trend analysis of maker education research in Korea. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 19(18), 947-970.
  28. Kim, Y. S. (2017). A study on developing the entrepreneurship through maker education in higher education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kyung Hee University, Chung Buk, Korea.
  29. Kwon, J. H. (2018). Developing a making-program and exploring applicability in fostering of core competency. Unpublished master's thesis, Dankook University, Seoul, Korea.
  30. Laster, J. F., & Thomas, R. G. (1997). Thinking for ethical action in families and communities. Family and consumer sciences teacher education yearbook 17. Peoria, IL: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill.
  31. Laster, J. F. (1982). A practical action teaching model. Journal of Home Economics, 74(3), 41-44.
  32. Laster, J. F. (2008). Nurturing critical literacy through practical problem solving. Journal of the Japan Association of Home Economics Education, 50(4), 261-271.
  33. Lee, C. Y., & Hong, H. G. (2018). A case study of chemistry inquiry R&E program based on maker activity. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(18), 131-154.
  34. Lee, J. Y. (2017). A case study on space building of middle school technology education facility for maker education. Unpublished master's thesis, Gwangju National University of Education, Gwangju, Korea.
  35. Lee, S.-B., Lee, S.-C., & Kim, T. Y. (2018). A study on the application of design thinking-based maker education in connection with creative experience activity in elementary school. Proceedings of the 2018 Korean Computer Education Association Conference (pp. 63-67). Seoul: The Korean Association of Computer Education.
  36. Lee, S., Kim, T., Yoon, J., Kang, S., & Kim, J. (2019). The effect of a design thinking-based maker education program on the creative problem solving ability of elementary school students. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 23(1), 73-84. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2019.23.1.73
  37. Lee, S. C., Lee, S. B., & Kim. T. Y. (2017). Development of a design thinking-based maker education program for elementary students. Proceedings of the 2017 Computer Education Association Conference (pp. 31-34). Seoul: The Korean Association of Computer Education.
  38. Lee, S. Y. (2017). The effect of steam maker education on self-esteem in elementary school students. Unpublished master's thesis, Kyungin University of Education, Incheon, Korea.
  39. Loertscher, D. V., Preddy, L., & Derry, B. (2013). Makerspaces in the school library learning commons and the uTEC maker model. Teacher Librarian, 41(2), 48-51.
  40. Martinez, S. L., & Stager, G. (2013). Invent to learn: Making, tinkering, and engineering in the classroom. Constructing Modern Knowledge Press.
  41. Maker Media & Deloitte. (2014). Impact of the maker movement. Retrieved from http://makermedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/impact-of-themaker-movement.pdf
  42. Martin, L. (2015). The promise of the maker movement for education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 5(1), 30-39.
  43. Son, J. Y., & Chae, J. H. (2013). The development of home economics education program for the prevention of school violence in middle school: Based on the practical action teaching model. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 25(2), 103-128.
  44. Taylor, B. (2016). Evaluating the benefit of the maker movement in K-12 STEM education. Electronic International Journal of Education, Arts, and Science (EIJEAS), 2(1), 1-23.
  45. Thomas, R. G. (1998). Thinking for ethical action in families: Family and consumer sciences meanings. In J. F. Laster & R. G. Thomas (Eds.), Thinking for ethical action in families and communities Yearbook 17 (pp. 15-27). Peoria, IL: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill.
  46. Yoon, H. J. (2018). The development of a model of maker education utilizing design thinking. The doctor's degree Graduate School of Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
  47. Yoon, H. J., Kang, I., & Kang, E. S. (2019). A case study of a maker education outreach program: fostering maker mindsets. Journal of Educational Technology, 35(2), 365-393. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.35.2.365

Cited by

  1. 전통 생활 문화 교육을 위한 스토리텔링 기반 메이커 교육 프로그램 개발: 전통 문양과 오방색을 중심으로 vol.32, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2020.03.32.1.51