Korean Journal of Radiology

The Korean Society of Radiology (대한영상의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Coronary CT Angiography with Knowledge-Based Iterative Model Reconstruction for Assessing Coronary Arteries and Non-Calcified Predominant Plaques

  • Tao Li (Department of Radiology, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital) ;
  • Tian Tang (Department of Radiology, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital) ;
  • Li Yang (Department of Radiology, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital) ;
  • Xinghua Zhang (Department of Radiology, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital) ;
  • Xueping Li (Department of Radiology, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital) ;
  • Chuncai Luo (Department of Radiology, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital)
  • Received : 2018.07.07
  • Accepted : 2019.01.21
  • Published : 2019.05.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effects of iterative model reconstruction (IMR) on image quality for demonstrating non-calcific high-risk plaque characteristics of coronary arteries. Materials and Methods: This study included 66 patients (53 men and 13 women; aged 39-76 years; mean age, 55 ± 13 years) having single-vessel disease with predominantly non-calcified plaques evaluated using prospective electrocardiogram-gated 256-slice CT angiography. Paired image sets were created using two types of reconstruction: hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) and IMR. Plaque characteristics were compared using the two algorithms. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the images and the CNR between the plaque and adjacent adipose tissue were also compared between the two reformatted methods. Results: Seventy-seven predominantly non-calcified plaques were detected. Forty plaques showed napkin-ring sign with the IMR reformatted method, while nineteen plaques demonstrated napkin-ring sign with HIR. There was no statistically significant difference in the presentation of positive remodeling, low attenuation plaque, and spotty calcification between the HIR and IMR reconstructed methods (all p > 0.5); however, there was a statistically significant difference in the ability to discern the napkin-ring sign between the two algorithms (χ2 = 12.12, p < 0.001). The image noise of IMR was lower than that of HIR (10 ± 2 HU versus 12 ± 2 HU; p < 0.01), and the SNR and CNR of the images and the CNR between plaques and surrounding adipose tissues on IMR were better than those on HIR (p < 0.01). Conclusion: IMR can significantly improve image quality compared with HIR for the demonstration of coronary artery and atherosclerotic plaques using a 256-slice CT.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by state key and research and development project grant 2016YFC1300300 and NSFC grant 81371547.

References

  1. Smith-Bindman R. Is computed tomography safe? N Engl J Med 2010;363:1-4  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1002530
  2. Leipsic J, Heilbron BG, Hague C. Iterative reconstruction for coronary CT angiography: finding its way. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;28:613-620  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-011-9832-3
  3. Silva AC, Lawder HJ, Hara A, Kujak J, Pavlicek W. Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:191-199  https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.2953
  4. Hou Y, Liu X, Xv S, Guo W, Guo Q. Comparisons of image quality and radiation dose between iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection reconstruction algorithms in 256-MDCT coronary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199:588-594  https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.7557
  5. Klink T, Obmann V, Heverhagen J, Stork A, Adam G, Begemann P. Reducing CT radiation dose with iterative reconstruction algorithms: the influence of scan and reconstruction parameters on image quality and CTDIvol. Eur J Radiol 2014;83:1645-1654  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.05.033
  6. Leipsic J, Labounty TM, Heilbron B, Min JK, Mancini GB, Lin FY, et al. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: assessment of image noise and image quality in coronary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:649-654  https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.4285
  7. Kropil P, Bigdeli AH, Nagel HD, Antoch G, Cohnen M. Impact of increasing levels of advanced iterative reconstruction on image quality in low-dose cardiac CT angiography. Rofo 2014;186:567-575  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1356074
  8. Wang R, Schoepf UJ, Wu R, Reddy RP, Zhang C, Yu W, et al. Image quality and radiation dose of low dose coronary CT angiography in obese patients: sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:3141-3145  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.04.012
  9. Yuki H, Utsunomiya D, Funama Y, Tokuyasu S, Namimoto T, Hirai T, et al. Value of knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction in low-kV 256-slice coronary CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2014;8:115-123  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2013.12.010
  10. Halpern EJ, Gingold EL, White H, Read K. Evaluation of coronary artery image quality with knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction. Acad Radiol 2014;21:805-811  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2014.02.017
  11. Oda S, Weissman G, Vembar M, Weigold WG. Iterative model reconstruction: improved image quality of low-tube-voltage prospective ECG-gated coronary CT angiography images at 256-slice CT. Eur J Radiol 2014;83:1408-1415  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.04.027
  12. Oda S, Utsunomiya D, Funama Y, Katahira K, Honda K, Tokuyasu S, et al. A knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction algorithm: can super-low-dose cardiac CT be applicable in clinical settings? Acad Radiol 2014;21:104-110  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2013.10.002
  13. Zhang F, Yang L, Song X, Li YN, Jiang Y, Zhang XH, et al. Feasibility study of low tube voltage (80 kVp) coronary CT angiography combined with contrast medium reduction using iterative model reconstruction (IMR) on standard BMI patients. Br J Radiol 2016;89:20150766 
  14. Lee J, Park CH, Oh CS, Han K, Kim TH. Coronary computed tomographic angiography at 80 kVp and knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction is non-inferior to that at 100 kVp with iterative reconstruction. PLoS One 2016;11:e0163410 
  15. Virmani R, Burke AP, Farb A, Kolodgie FD. Pathology of the vulnerable plaque. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47(8 Suppl):C13-C18  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.065
  16. Leipsic J, Abbara S, Achenbach S, Cury R, Earls JP, Mancini GJ, et al. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2014;8:342-358  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2014.07.003
  17. Feuchtner G, Kerber J, Burghard P, Dichtl W, Friedrich G, Bonaros N, et al. The high-risk criteria low-attenuation plaque <60 HU and the napkin-ring sign are the most powerful predictors of MACE: a long-term follow-up study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;18:772-779  https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jew167
  18. Schmid M, Pflederer T, Jang IK, Ropers D, Sei K, Daniel WG, et al. Relationship between degree of remodeling and CT attenuation of plaque in coronary atherosclerotic lesions: an in-vivo analysis by multi-detector computed tomography. Atherosclerosis 2008;197:457-464  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.07.003
  19. Hu MQ, Li M, Liu ZY, Huang MP, Liu H, Liang CH. Image quality evaluation of iterative model reconstruction on low tube voltage (80 kVp) coronary CT angiography in an animal study. Acta Radiol 2016;57:170-177  https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185114568909
  20. Chang W, Lee JM, Lee K, Yoon JH, Yu MH, Han JK, et al. Assessment of a model-based, iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) regarding image quality and dose reduction in liver computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2013;48:598-606  https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182899104
  21. Hausleiter J, Martinoff S, Hadamitzky M, Martuscelli E, Pschierer I, Feuchtner GM, et al. Image quality and radiation exposure with a low tube voltage protocol for coronary CT angiography results of the PROTECTION II Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;3:1113-1123  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.08.016
  22. Feuchtner GM, Jodocy D, Klauser A, Haberfellner B, Aglan I, Spoeck A, et al. Radiation dose reduction by using 100-kV tube voltage in cardiac 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study. Eur J Radiol 2010;75:e51-e56  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.07.012
  23. Park CH, Lee J, Oh C, Han KH, Kim TH. The feasibility of sub-millisievert coronary CT angiography with low tube voltage, prospective ECG gating, and a knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction algorithm. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;31 Suppl 2:197-203  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-015-0795-7
  24. Andre F, Fortner P, Vembar M, Mueller D, Stiller W, Buss SJ, et al. Improved image quality with simultaneously reduced radiation exposure: knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction algorithms for coronary CT angiography in a clinical setting. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2017;11:213-220  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2017.02.007
  25. Iyama Y, Nakaura T, Yokoyama K, Kidoh M, Harada K, Oda S, et al. Low-contrast and low-radiation dose protocol in cardiac computed tomography: usefulness of low tube voltage and knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction algorithm. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2016;40:941-947 https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000000440