Nuclear Engineering and Technology

Korean Nuclear Society (한국원자력학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Sensitivity studies on a novel nuclear forensics methodology for source reactor-type discrimination of separated weapons grade plutonium

  • Kitcher, Evans D. (Center for Nuclear Security Science & Policy Initiatives, College Station) ;
  • Osborn, Jeremy M. (Center for Nuclear Security Science & Policy Initiatives, College Station) ;
  • Chirayath, Sunil S. (Center for Nuclear Security Science & Policy Initiatives, College Station)
  • Received : 2018.12.20
  • Accepted : 2019.02.25
  • Published : 2019.06.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A recently published nuclear forensics methodology for source discrimination of separated weapons-grade plutonium utilizes intra-element isotope ratios and a maximum likelihood formulation to identify the most likely source reactor-type, fuel burnup and time since irradiation of unknown material. Sensitivity studies performed here on the effects of random measurement error and the uncertainty in intra-element isotope ratio values show that different intra-element isotope ratios have disproportionate contributions to the determination of the reactor parameters. The methodology is robust to individual errors in measured intra-element isotope ratio values and even more so for uniform systematic errors due to competing effects on the predictions from the selected intra-element isotope ratios suite. For a unique sample-model pair, simulation uncertainties of up to 28% are acceptable without impeding successful source-reactor discrimination. However, for a generic sample with multiple plausible sources within the reactor library, uncertainties of 7% or less may be required. The results confirm the critical role of accurate reactor core physics, fuel burnup simulations and experimental measurements in the proposed methodology where increased simulation uncertainty is found to significantly affect the capability to discriminate between the reactors in the library.

Keywords

References

  1. J.M. Osborn, E.D. Kitcher, J.D. Burns, C.M. Folden III, S.S. Chirayath, Nuclear forensics methodology for reactor-type Attribution of chemically separated plutonium, Nucl. Tech. 201 (1) (2018) 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2017.1401442
  2. D.B. Pelowitz, MCNPX User's Manual, Version 2.7.0, LA-CP-11-00438, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 2011.
  3. D.B. Pelowitz, MCNP6 User's Manual, Version 1.0.0, LA-CP-13-00634, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 2013.
  4. J. Hendricks, G. Mckinney, M. Fensin, M. James, R. Johns, J. Durkee, J. Finch, D. Pelowitz, L. Waters, M. Johnson, F. Gallmeier, MCNPX 2.6.0 Extensions, LA-UR-08-2216, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 2008.
  5. J.M. Osborn, E.D. Kitcher, K.J. Glennon, J.D. Burns, C.M. Folden III, S.S. Chirayath, Experimental validation of a nuclear forensics methodology for source reactor-type discrimination of chemically separated plutonium, Nucl. Eng. Tech. 51 (2) (April, 2019) 384-393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2018.11.003.
  6. M.W. Swinney, C.M. Folden III, R.J. Ellis, S.S. Chirayath, Experimental and computational forensics characterization of weapons-grade plutonium produced in a fast reactor neutron environment, Nucl. Tech. 197 (1) (2017) 1-11. January. https://doi.org/10.13182/NT16-76
  7. J.M. Osborn, K.J. Glennon, E.D. Kitcher, J.D. Burns, C.M. Folden III, S.S. Chirayath, Computational and experimental forensics characterization of weapons-grade plutonium produced in a thermal neutron environment, Nucl. Eng. Tech. 50 (6) (2018) 820-828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2018.04.017
  8. J. Hendricks, G. Mckinney, M. Fensin, M. James, R. Johns, J. Durkee, J. Finch, D. Pelowitz, L. Waters, M. Johnson, F. Gallmeier, MCNPX 2.6.0 Extensions, LA-UR-08-2216, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 2008.
  9. S.C. Chetal, V. Balasubramaniyan, P. Chellapandi, P. Mohanakrishnan, P. Puthiyavinayagam, C.P. Pillai, S. Raghupathy, T.K. Shanmugham, C.S. Pillai, The design of the prototype fast breeder reactor, Nucl. Eng. Des. 236 (2006) 852-860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2005.09.025
  10. S.S. Chirayath, G. Hollenbeck, J. Ragusa, P. Nelson, Neutronic and Nonproliferation characteristics of (PuO2-UO2) and (PuO2-ThO2) as fast reactor fuels, Nucl. Eng. Des. 239 (2009) 1916-1924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.05.019
  11. A. Glaser, M.V. Ramana, Weapon-grade plutonium production potential in the Indian prototype fast breeder reactor, Sci. Global Secur. 15 (2007) 85-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/08929880701609154
  12. S.S. Bajaj, A.R. Gore The Indian PHWR, Nucl. Eng. Des. 236 (2006) 701-722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2005.09.028
  13. Westinghouse Electric Company LLC, AP1000 European design control document, Section 4 (3) (2009).
  14. S.S. Chirayath, J.M. Osborn, T.M. Coles, Trace fission product ratios for nuclear forensics attribution of weapons-grade plutonium from fast and thermal reactors, Sci. Global Secur. 23 (2015) 48-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/08929882.2015.996079
  15. K. Mayer, M. Wallenius, T. Funghanel, Nuclear forensic science - from cradle to maturity, J. Alloy. Comp. 444 (2007) 50-56.
  16. M. Benedict, T.H. Pigford, H.W. Levi, Nuclear Chemical Engineering, second ed., Mcgraw-Hill Series In Nuclear Engineering, New York, 1981.
  17. P.M. Mendoza, S.S. Chirayath, C.M. Folden III, Fission product decontamination factors for plutonium separated by PUREX from low-burnup, fast-neutron irradiated depleted UO2, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 118 (2016) 38-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2016.08.021
  18. W.S. Charlton, B.L. Fearey, C.W. Nakhleh, T.A. Parish, R.T. Perry, J. Poths, J.R. Quagliano, W.D. Stanbro, W.B. Wilson, Operator declaration verification technique for spent fuel at reprocessing facilities, Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 168 (2000) 98-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-583X(99)00633-3
  19. I.C. Gauld, S.M. Bowman, J.E. Horwedel Origen-ARP, Automatic Rapid Processing for Spent Fuel Depletion, Decay, and Source Term Analysis, June 2011.
  20. SCALE, A Comprehensive Modeling and Simulation Suite for Nuclear Safety Analysis and Design, ORNL/TM-2005/39, Version 6.1, June 2011.
  21. A.C. Hayes, G. Jungman, Determining reactor flux from xenon-136 and cesium-135 in spent fuel, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 690 (2012) 68-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2012.06.031