Nuclear Engineering and Technology

  • 제51권5호
  • /
  • Pages.1297-1306
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 1738-5733(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-358X(eISSN)
한국원자력학회 (Korean Nuclear Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Remaining and emerging issues pertaining to the human reliability analysis of domestic nuclear power plants

  • 투고 : 2018.08.18
  • 심사 : 2019.02.22
  • 발행 : 2019.06.25
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Probabilistic safety assessments (PSA) have been used for several decades to visualize the risk level of commercial nuclear power plants (NPPs). Since the role of a human reliability analysis (HRA) is to provide human error probabilities for safety critical tasks to support PSA, PSA quality is strongly affected by HRA quality. Therefore, it is important to understand the underlying limitations or problems of HRA techniques. For this reason, this study conducted a survey among 14 subject matter experts who represent the HRA community of domestic Korean NPPs. As a result, five significant HRA issues were identified: (1) providing a technical basis for the K-HRA (Korean HRA) method, and developing dedicated HRA methods applicable to (2) diverse external events to support Level 1 PSA, (3) digital environments, (4) mobile equipment, and (5) severe accident management guideline tasks to support Level 2 PSA. In addition, an HRA method to support multi-unit PSA was emphasized because it plays an important role in the evaluation of site risk, which is one of the hottest current issues. It is believed that creating such a catalog of prioritized issues will be a good indication of research direction to improve HRA and therefore PSA quality.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. U.S Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), An approach for determining the technical adequacy of probabilistic risk assessment results for risk-informed activities, in: Regulatory Guide 1.200, 2009. Part 3.
  2. American Society of, American Society of Mechanical Engineering (ASME) and American Nuclear Society (ANS), Standard for Level 1/large Early Release Frequency Probabilistic Risk Assessment for Nuclear Power Plant Applications, Addenda to ASME/ANS RA-S-2008, 2013. RA-Sb.
  3. J.M. O'Hara, J.C. Higgins, J.J. Persensky, P. Lewis, J. Bongarra, Human Factors Engineering Pro, 2004.
  4. I.S. Kim, B.G. Kim, D.I. Choi, E. Lee, Incorporating MACST mitigation strategy into PSA models: HRA and data issues, in: Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Autumn Meeting, October 25-27, Gyeongju, Republic of Korea, 2017.
  5. S. Kim, K. Oh, Application of HuRECA analysis method to APR-1400 HRA, in:Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Spring Meeting, May 18-19, Jeju, Republic of Korea, 2017.
  6. S.W. Lee, J.S. Ha, P.H. Seong, J.H. Park, J.K. Kim, Development of a HRA method based on human factor issues for advanced NPP, in: Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Spring Meeting, May 27-28, Pyeongchang, Republic of Korea, 2010.
  7. Y.J. Chang, J. Xing, S. Peters, Human reliability analysis method development in the U.S Nuclear Regulatory Commission, in: 13th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (PSAM 13), October 2-7, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2016.
  8. Electric Power Research Institute, SHARP1 - A Revised Systematic Human Action Reliability Procedure, 1992. EPRI-TR-101711.
  9. D. Gertman, H. Blackman, J. Marble, J. Byers, C. Smith, The SPAR-H Human Reliability Method, NUREG/CR-6883, Idaho National Laboratory, 2005.
  10. A. Kolaczkowski, J. Forester, E. Lois, S. Cooper, Good practices for implementing human reliability analysis, NUREG-1792, in: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2005.
  11. U.S Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), EPRI/NRC-RES Fire Human Reliability Analysis Guidelines, 2009. NUREG-1921.
  12. A.D. Swain, Accident Sequence Evaluation Program Human Reliability Analysis Procedure, NUREG/CR-4772, Sandia National Laboratories, 1987.
  13. A.D. Swain, H.E. Guttmann, Handbook of Human Reliability Analysis with Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications, NUREG/CR-1278, Sandia National Laboratories, 1983.
  14. J. Park, Y. Kim, W. Jung, J. Kim, J.H. Park, S.C. Jang, A Study on the Application of a Novel Seismic HRA Method to Nuclear Power Plants, KAERI/TR-5643/2014, Daejeon, Republic of Korea, 2014.
  15. J.M. O'Hara, J.C. Higgins, W.F. Stubler, J. Krame, Computer-based Procedure Systems: Technical Basis and Human Factors Review Guidance, NUREG/CR-6634, Brookhaven National Laboratory, New York, 2000. BNL-NUREG-55264.
  16. J.M. O'Hara, W.S. Brown, The Effects of Interface Management Tasks on Crew Performance and Safety in Complex, Computer-Based Systems, 2002. NUREG/CR-6690, Washington, DC.
  17. J.M. O'Hara, R.E. Hall, Advanced control rooms and crew performance issues:implications for human reliability, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 39 (4) (1992) 919-923. https://doi.org/10.1109/23.159733
  18. M. Porthin, M. Liinasuo, T. Kling, HRA of Digital Control Rooms: Literature Review, VTT-R-00434-16, VTT, Finland, 2015.
  19. T. Zachariah, D. Vanover, J. Weglian, B. Webster, P. Tarpinian, R. Fine, D. Haessler, R. Davis-Zapata, M. Powell, R. Bunt, Y. Jo, Crediting Mitigating Strategies in Risk-Informed Decision Making, NEI 16-06/2016, Washington D.C., USA, August, 2016.
  20. D.E. MacLeod, G.W. Parry, B.D. Sloane, P. Lawrence, E.M. Chan, A.V. Trifanov, Simplified Human Reliability Analysis Process for Emergency Mitigation Equipment (EME) Deployment, International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (PSAM 12), Honolulu, Hawaii, June, 2014, 2014.
  21. V. Fauchille, H. Bonneville, J.Y. Maguer, Experience Feedback from Fukushima towards Human Reliability Analysis for Level 2 Probabilistic Safety Assessments, International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (PSAM 12), June, Honolulu, Hawaii, 2014.
  22. S. St Germain, R. Boring, G. Banaseanu, Y. Akl, M. Xu, Modification of the SPAR-H method to support HRA for Level 2 PSA, in: 13th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, Seoul, South Korea October 2-7, 2016.
  23. E.C. Susan, J. Xing, Y.J. Chang, What HRA needs to support site-wide, multi-hszard Level 2 PRA, in: International Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis, Columbia, SC, September 22-26, 2013.
  24. J. Ha, Y. Jin, K.S. Jung, M.J. Hwang, S.H. Han, D.I. Kang, Y.H. Lee, T.Y. Sung, J.E. Yang, H.D. Kim, S.Y. Park, J.H. Park, R.J. Park, S.D. Kim, M.K. Hwang, Development of Accident Management Guidance for Korean Standard Nuclear Power Plants, KAERI/RR-1939/98, Republic of Korea, Daejeon, 1998.
  25. R.J. Park, D.H. Kim, Evaluation of Entry Condition for Severe Accident Management Guidance, IAEA Technical meeting on SAA and SAMG, Vienna, Austria, November, 2015.
  26. S. Park, Y. Jin, S. Kim, Y. Song, Severe Accident Management Guidance for Pressurized Heavy Water Reactors, KAERI/TR-3283, Daejeon, Republic of Korea, 2006.
  27. E.C. Sauvage, G. Dirksen, T.C. de Brunellis, Applicability of PSA Level 2 in the design of nuclear power plants, in: International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (PSAM 12), Honolulu, Hawaii, June, 2014.
  28. CNSC, Summary Report of the International Workshop on Multi-Unit Probabilistic Safety Assessment. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, November 17-20, 2014.
  29. D.S. Kim, S.H. Han, J.H. Park, H.G. Lim, J.H. Kim, Multiunit Level 1 Probabilistic Safety Assessment: Approaches and Their Application to a Six-Unit Nuclear Power Plant Site, Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 2018 to be published in, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2018.01.006.
  30. M. Modarres, T. Zhou, M. Massoud, Advances in multi-unit nuclear power plant probabilistic risk assessment, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 157 (2017) 87-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.08.005
  31. J. Park, D.H. Ham, J. Kim, W.J. Jung, Characterizing Decision-Making Tasks Included in SAMGs, International Workshop on Status of Site Level PSA (Including Multi-Unit PSA) Development, Munich, Germany, 2018.
  32. S.W. Jang, S.W. Lee, H.C. Ho, Improvement of diagnostic flow chart severe accident management guidance for nuclear power plants in Korea, in:Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Autumn Meeting Gyeongju, Korea, October, 2016.
  33. M. Kim, S. Hong, K. Lee, C. Byun, Y. Jin, Development of severe accident management guidance for NPP in Korea, in: International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (PSAM 6), San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA, June, 2002.
  34. J. Park, W. Jung, S. Kim, S.Y. Choi, Y. Kim, S.J. Lee, J.E. Yang, V.N. Dang, A Guideline to Collect HRA Data in the Simulator of Nuclear Power Plants, KAERI/TR-5206/2013, Daejeon, Republic of Korea, 2013.

피인용 문헌

  1. Multi-unit nuclear power plant probabilistic risk assessment: A comprehensive survey vol.213, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107782