Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effects of hard and soft tissue grafting and individualization of healing abutments at immediate implants: an experimental study in dogs

  • Thoma, Daniel S. (Clinic of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zurich) ;
  • Jung, Ui-Won (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Gil, Alfonso (Clinic of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zurich) ;
  • Kim, Myong Ji (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Paeng, Kyeong-Won (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Jung, Ronald E. (Clinic of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zurich) ;
  • Fickl, Stefan (Department of Periodontology, Julius-Maximilians-University of Wuurzburg)
  • Received : 2019.03.04
  • Accepted : 2019.05.21
  • Published : 2019.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effects of intra-alveolar socket grafting, subepithelial connective tissue grafts, and individualized abutments on peri-implant hard and soft tissue outcomes following immediate implant placement. Methods: This randomized experimental study employed 5 mongrel dogs, with 4 sites per dog (total of 20 sites). The mesial roots of P3 and P4 were extracted in each hemimandible and immediate dental implants were placed. Each site was randomly assigned to 1 of 4 different treatment groups: standardized healing abutment (control group), alloplastic bone substitute material (BSS) + standardized healing abutment (SA group), BSS + individualized healing abutment (IA group), and BSS + individualized healing abutment + a subepithelial connective tissue graft (IAG group). Clinical, histological, and profilometric analyses were performed. The intergroup differences were calculated using the Bonferroni test, setting statistical significance at P<0.05. Results: Clinically, the control and SA groups demonstrated a coronal shift in the buccal height of the mucosa ($0.88{\pm}0.48mm$ and $0.37{\pm}1.1mm$, respectively). The IA and IAG groups exhibited an apical shift of the mucosa ($-0.7{\pm}1.15mm$ and $-1.1{\pm}0.96mm$, respectively). Histologically, the SA and control groups demonstrated marginal mucosa heights of $4.1{\pm}0.28mm$ and $4.0{\pm}0.53mm$ relative to the implant shoulder, respectively. The IA and IAG groups, in contrast, only showed a height of 2.6mm. In addition, the height of the mucosa in relation to the most coronal buccal bone crest or bone substitute particles was not significantly different among the groups. Volumetrically, the IA group ($-0.73{\pm}0.46mm$) lost less volume on the buccal side than the control ($-0.93{\pm}0.44mm$), SA ($-0.97{\pm}0.73mm$), and IAG ($-0.88{\pm}0.45mm$) groups. Conclusions: The control group demonstrated the most favorable change of height of the margo mucosae and the largest dimensions of the peri-implant soft tissues. However, the addition of a bone substitute material and an individualized healing abutment resulted in slightly better preservation of the peri-implant soft tissue contour.

Keywords

References

  1. Lang NP, Pun L, Lau KY, Li KY, Wong MC. A systematic review on survival and success rates of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets after at least 1 year. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23 Suppl 5:39-66.
  2. Covani U, Chiappe G, Bosco M, Orlando B, Quaranta A, Barone A. A 10-year evaluation of implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: a prospective cohort study. J Periodontol 2012;83:1226-34. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2012.110583
  3. Hammerle CH, Chen ST, Wilson TG Jr. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding the placement of implants in extraction sockets. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19 Suppl:26-8.
  4. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Polyzos IP, Felice P, Worthington HV. Timing of implant placement after tooth extraction: immediate, immediate-delayed or delayed implants? A Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantology 2010;3:189-205.
  5. Belser UC, Grutter L, Vailati F, Bornstein MM, Weber HP, Buser D. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. J Periodontol 2009;80:140-51. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080435
  6. Merheb J, Quirynen M, Teughels W. Critical buccal bone dimensions along implants. Periodontol 2000 2014;66:97-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12042
  7. Vignoletti F, Matesanz P, Rodrigo D, Figuero E, Martin C, Sanz M. Surgical protocols for ridge preservation after tooth extraction. A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23 Suppl 5:22-38.
  8. Chen ST, Buser D. Esthetic outcomes following immediate and early implant placement in the anterior maxilla--a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29 Suppl:186-215. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g3.3
  9. Tarnow DP, Chu SJ, Salama MA, Stappert CF, Salama H, Garber DA, et al. Flapless postextraction socket implant placement in the esthetic zone: part 1. The effect of bone grafting and/or provisional restoration on facial-palatal ridge dimensional change-a retrospective cohort study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2014;34:323-31. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.1821
  10. Caneva M, Botticelli D, Pantani F, Baffone GM, Rangel IG Jr, Lang NP. Deproteinized bovine bone mineral in marginal defects at implants installed immediately into extraction sockets: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:106-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02202.x
  11. Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Socket grafting with the use of autologous bone: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:9-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01937.x
  12. Migliorati M, Amorfini L, Signori A, Biavati AS, Benedicenti S. Clinical and aesthetic outcome with post-extractive implants with or without soft tissue augmentation: a 2-year randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17:983-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12194
  13. Yoshino S, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Roe P, Lozada JL. Effects of connective tissue grafting on the facial gingival level following single immediate implant placement and provisionalization in the esthetic zone: a 1-year randomized controlled prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:432-40. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3379
  14. Zuiderveld EG, Meijer HJ, den Hartog L, Vissink A, Raghoebar GM. Effect of connective tissue grafting on peri-implant tissue in single immediate implant sites: A RCT. J Clin Periodontol 2018;45:253-64.
  15. De Bruyn H, Raes F, Cooper LF, Reside G, Garriga JS, Tarrida LG, et al. Three-years clinical outcome of immediate provisionalization of single Osseospeed($^{TM}$) implants in extraction sockets and healed ridges. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:217-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02449.x
  16. Chu SJ, Salama MA, Garber DA, Salama H, Sarnachiaro GO, Sarnachiaro E, et al. Flapless postextraction socket implant placement, part 2: the effects of bone grafting and provisional restoration on peri-implant soft tissue height and thickness- a retrospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2015;35:803-9. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.2178
  17. Cooper LF, Reside GJ, Raes F, Garriga JS, Tarrida LG, Wiltfang J, et al. Immediate provisionalization of dental implants placed in healed alveolar ridges and extraction sockets: a 5-year prospective evaluation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:709-17. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3617
  18. Kilkenny C, Browne W, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG; National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Amimals in Research. Animal research: reporting in vivo experiments--the ARRIVE guidelines. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2011;31:991-3. https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2010.220
  19. De Rouck T, Collys K, Wyn I, Cosyn J. Instant provisionalization of immediate single-tooth implants is essential to optimize esthetic treatment outcome. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:566-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01674.x
  20. Cooper LF, Raes F, Reside GJ, Garriga JS, Tarrida LG, Wiltfang J, et al. Comparison of radiographic and clinical outcomes following immediate provisionalization of single-tooth dental implants placed in healed alveolar ridges and extraction sockets. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:1222-32.
  21. Quirynen M, Bollen CM, Papaioannou W, Van Eldere J, van Steenberghe D. The influence of titanium abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and gingivitis: short-term observations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:169-78.
  22. Quirynen M, van der Mei HC, Bollen CM, Schotte A, Marechal M, Doornbusch GI, et al. An in vivo study of the influence of the surface roughness of implants on the microbiology of supra- and subgingival plaque. J Dent Res 1993;72:1304-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345930720090801
  23. Welander M, Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T. The mucosal barrier at implant abutments of different materials. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:635-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01543.x
  24. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Glantz PO, Lindhe J. The mucosal attachment at different abutments. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 1998;25:721-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1998.tb02513.x
  25. Dahlin C, Obrecht M, Dard M, Donos N. Bone tissue modelling and remodelling following guided bone regeneration in combination with biphasic calcium phosphate materials presenting different microporosity. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:814-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12361
  26. Schmidlin PR, Nicholls F, Kruse A, Zwahlen RA, Weber FE. Evaluation of moldable, in situ hardening calcium phosphate bone graft substitutes. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:149-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02315.x
  27. Yip I, Ma L, Mattheos N, Dard M, Lang NP. Defect healing with various bone substitutes. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:606-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12395
  28. Kakar A, Rao BH, Hegde S, Deshpande N, Lindner A, Nagursky H, et al. Ridge preservation using an in situ hardening biphasic calcium phosphate ($\beta$-TCP/HA) bone graft substitute-a clinical, radiological, and histological study. Int J Implant Dent 2017;3:25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-017-0086-2
  29. Luckerath W, Roder L, Enkling N. The effect of primary stabilization of the graft in a combined surgical and prosthodontic ridge preservation protocol: a prospective controlled clinical pilot study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2018;38:e49-58. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.3172
  30. Favero V, Lang NP, Canullo L, Urbizo Velez J, Bengazi F, Botticelli D. Sinus floor elevation outcomes following perforation of the Schneiderian membrane. An experimental study in sheep. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;27:233-40.
  31. Naenni N, Bienz SP, Jung RE, Hammerle CH, Thoma DS. Histologic analyses of flapless ridge preservation in sockets with buccal dehiscence defects using two alloplastic bone graft substitutes. Clin Oral Investig 2019;
  32. Raes F, Cosyn J, Crommelinck E, Coessens P, De Bruyn H. Immediate and conventional single implant treatment in the anterior maxilla: 1-year results of a case series on hard and soft tissue response and aesthetics. J Clin Periodontol 2011;38:385-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01687.x
  33. Blanco J, Nunez V, Aracil L, Munoz F, Ramos I. Ridge alterations following immediate implant placement in the dog: flap versus flapless surgery. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:640-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01237.x
  34. Chen ST, Darby IB, Reynolds EC, Clement JG. Immediate implant placement postextraction without flap elevation. J Periodontol 2009;80:163-72. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080243
  35. Fickl S, Kebschull M, Schupbach P, Zuhr O, Schlagenhauf U, Hurzeler MB. Bone loss after full-thickness and partial-thickness flap elevation. J Clin Periodontol 2011;38:157-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01658.x

Cited by

  1. Immediate implant placement in conjunction with guided bone regeneration and/or connective tissue grafts: an experimental study in canines vol.51, 2021, https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2104040202
  2. Effect of customized healing abutments on the peri‐implant linear and volumetric tissue changes at maxillary immediate implant sites: A 1‐year prospective randomized clinical trial vol.23, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13044
  3. A case series of profilometric changes in two implant placement protocols at periodontally compromised non-molar sites vol.11, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81402-5